Effects of Interdisciplinary Treatment on Sickness Absence in Patients With Chronic Pain

October 16, 2020 updated by: Bjorn Ang, Dalarna University
Chronic pain is a globally prevalent condition that causes enormous social costs; largely due to sickness absence. A common intervention for patients with chronic pain problems is interdisciplinary treatment (IDT), which consists of a combination of physical exercise, cognitive behavioural therapy and work training coordinated in an interdisciplinary team. Based on data from Swedish National Registers, this study evaluates the effects of IDT on sickness absence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a completely register-based observational cohort study. The study population is defined from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP), which routinely aggregates data from specialist IDT pain management clinics across Sweden. SQRP contains information on the exposure/intervention: whether a patient that visited a SQRP-affiliated clinic was allocated to an IDT program (test) or not (control); t0 defined as the day of the IDT assessment. Microdata from SQRP is linked to other Swedish registers via the unique personal identification number held by all Swedish residents. Outcome data is obtained from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency. Registers managed by the National Board of Health and Welfare include data on dispensed prescription pharmaceuticals and specialist health care.

Markov multistate survival-based methods will be used to compare the sickness absence between groups. Specifically, length of stay per sickness absence state (no sickness absence, sick leave, and disability pension) will be compared over five years from t0. Both crude and adjusted estimates will be presented. Adjustment will be made based on our hypothesis about causal relationships and include: history of sickness absence, sociodemographics (age, sex, sociodemographic status), patient disability (emotional distress, everyday interference, and confidence in future improvement), and governmental policy (IDT assessment year and geographical region of IDT clinic).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

25000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients that visited a Swedish SQRP-affiliated IDT specialist clinic.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IDT startyear: 2009-2016
  • Age 18-60 yeras
  • Pain duration of minimum 90 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer in the previous 5 years
  • An IDT assessment in the previous 2 years
  • Full or partial disability pension in the year preceding the IDT assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
IDT patients
Allocated to an IDT program
Interdisciplinary treatment (IDT) distinguishes itself as an interdisciplinary-coordinated (e.g., physician, occupational therapist, physiotherapist, and psychologist) intervention using a bio-psycho-social view of chronic pain. The MMR continues over a lengthy period with a common goal and generally includes patient education, supervised physical activity, simulated work training, and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). The exact composition of these MMR components depends on initial evaluations of the patients health status and furhter follow-up testing. The MMR interventional components can act independently and interdependently, resulting in combined effects due to known and unknown mechanisms; the effects are intended to be greater than the sum of its components.
Other Names:
  • multimodal rehabilitation
Non-IDT patients
Not allocated to an IDT program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sickness absence
Time Frame: 5 years
Length of stay per sickness absence state: no sickness absence, sick leave, disability pension
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Dalarna University

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on interdisciplinary treatment

Subscribe