A Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron for the Treatment of Anemia Following Cardiac Surgery (PICS)

June 27, 2023 updated by: Michael Kremke

The Postoperative Iron in Cardiac Surgery (PICS-) Trial: A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Single-, High-dose Intravenous Iron and Oral Iron for the Treatment of Anaemia Following Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND Anemia and iron deficiency are highly prevalent in cardiac surgery patients. Both conditions may adversely affect postoperative rehabilitation.

At hospital discharge, anemia is almost invariably present due to perioperative blood loss and frequent blood sampling. Two previous analyses demonstrated a prevalence of anemia early after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) of 94% and 98%, respectively. Almost half of CABG patients had persistent anemia two months after surgery. Postoperative anemia may result in debilitating symptoms, like dyspnoea, fatigue and poor exercise tolerance, and is associated with an increased likelihood of cardiovascular events and death after cardiac surgery.

Mild to moderate anemia is commonly corrected with oral iron supplements. Oral iron is however poorly absorbed in patients with chronic diseases, and about 40% of patients suffer from debilitating gastrointestinal side-effects. As iron stores are frequently reduced or depleted after cardiac surgery, treatment with oral iron supplements may take several months.

In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), iron deficiency is associated with reduced exercise capacity, quality of life and survival even in the absence of anemia. Several large randomised trials demonstrated that treatment with intravenous iron improved clinical symptoms, exercise capacity and quality of life of CHF patients.

RATIONALE It is desirable to replenish body iron stores rapidly after cardiac surgery with the aim to effectively correct anemia, optimize exercise tolerance and improve patient wellbeing.

Modern intravenous iron formulations permit fast replenishment of body iron stores and have emerged as potential alternatives to oral iron. These formulations are well-tolerated and have become an established therapeutic option in anemic patients with reduced intestinal iron absorption. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous iron for the treatment of anemia following major non-cardiac surgery.

Data regarding the efficacy of intravenous iron in cardiac surgery, however, are conflicting.

HYPOTHESIS Single-dose intravenous iron therapy with ferric derisomaltose/iron isomaltoside is superior to oral iron supplementation for the correction of anemia following cardiac surgery. Moreover, single-dose intravenous iron therapy with ferric derisomaltose/iron isomaltoside results in a greater postoperative exercise capacity, an improved quality of life and less fatigue.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years of age or older undergoing first-time, non-emergent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Eligible procedures are A: isolated CABG surgery (+/- arrhythmia surgery), B: isolated cardiac valve surgery (+/- arrhythmia surgery), C: a combination of CABG and cardiac valve surgery (+/- arrhythmia surgery)
  • Moderate anaemia on the first postoperative day. According to World Health Organization-criteria defined as a haemoglobin concentration of equal to or greater than 5.0 mmol/l (8 g/dl) and less than 6.8 mmol/l (11 g/dl).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to any iron formulation
  • Multiple drug allergies or history of previous anaphylaxis
  • Severe asthma, eczema or another atopic allergy
  • Rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus
  • History of iron overload or disturbances in iron utilisation (e.g. haemochromatosis, hemosiderosis)
  • History of liver disease (e.g. cirrhosis)
  • Severe active infection or inflammation (e.g. endocarditis)
  • Porphyria cutanea tarda
  • Treatment with intravenous iron within 4 weeks prior to surgery.
  • Untreated vitamin B12 or folate deficiency.
  • Anticipated inability to perform a six-minute walk test.
  • Women of childbearing potential, pregnant and nursing women.
  • Anticipated postoperative length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) > 48 hours.
  • Patients incapable of giving consent personally.
  • Significantly increased risk of non-adherence or loss to follow-up.
  • Active participation in another interventional trial with potential impact on postoperative anaemia or exercise capacity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intravenous iron group
Single-dose intravenous infusion of 20 mg/kg body weight ferric derisomaltose/iron isomaltoside 1000 (MonoFer®)
Single-dose intravenous infusion, 20 mg/kg body weight, postoperative day 1
Other Names:
  • MonoFer, iron isomaltoside 1000
Active Comparator: Oral iron group
Oral therapy with 100 mg oral ferrous sulfate twice daily
Oral therapy, 100 mg twice daily, from postoperative day 4 until 4-week follow-up
Other Names:
  • Ferro Duretter
Single-dose infusion (placebo), postoperative day 1
Other Names:
  • 0.9% natriumchloride

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of participants who are neither anemic nor have received allogeneic red blood cells since randomisation
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Unit: percentage; anemia according to WHO criteria defined as hemoglobin < 12 g/dl in women and < 13 g/dl in men.
4-week follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in hemoglobin level
Time Frame: From baseline to 4-week follow-up
Unit: g/dl
From baseline to 4-week follow-up
Proportion of participants with a haemoglobin increase ≥ 1.3 mmol/l (≥ 2 g/dL)
Time Frame: From baseline to 4-week follow-up
Unit: %
From baseline to 4-week follow-up
Mean haemoglobin level
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Unit: g/dl
4-week follow-up
Mean reticulocyte count
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Unit: 10^9/l
4-week follow-up
Mean plasma iron
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
μmol/l
4-week follow-up
Mean plasma ferritin
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
µg/l
4-week follow-up
Mean transferrin saturation
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Unit: %
4-week follow-up
Mean change in haemoglobin level
Time Frame: From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Unit: g/dl
From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Mean change in reticulocyte count
Time Frame: From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Unit: 10^9/l
From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Mean change in plasma iron
Time Frame: From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
μmol/l
From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Mean change in plasma ferritin
Time Frame: From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
µg/l
From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Mean change in transferrin saturation
Time Frame: From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Unit: %
From the day before surgery to 4-week follow-up
Proportion of participants transfused with allogeneic red blood cells
Time Frame: From the time of randomisation to 4-week follow-up
Units: %
From the time of randomisation to 4-week follow-up
Six-minute walk distance
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Units: meter
4-week follow-up
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Health-related quality of life is assessed with the standardized European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Group five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D). The outcome of interest is the visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) consists of a descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the best endpoint is "100" and the worst "0".
4-week follow-up
Fatique
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Fatigue is assessed using the validated Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20). The outcome of interest is physical fatigue. The MFI-20 consists of 20 items for the assessment of fatigue in five different dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation, and mental fatigue. Each dimension contains four items for which participants have to indicate on a five-point scale how the particular statement suited their experience. An equal number of items are worded in a positive and a negative way to counteract for response tendencies. A score of four indicates no presence of fatigue, while a score of 20 indicates the highest level of fatigue.
4-week follow-up
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Assessing symptoms (i.e. angina and dyspnea) and the resulting limitations during ordinary physical activity. Class I-IV. I=no symptoms, higher classes are associated with more severe symptoms and limitations. IV=severe symptoms and limitations. The outcome of interest is the proportion of participants with a NYHA functional class of I.
4-week follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gastrointestinal symptoms
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up

Participants are asked to report the gastrointestinal symptoms the week prior to follow-up.

We developed a simple scoring system with the five dimensions nausea, constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain and bloating. Participants are asked to rate the presence and severity of each symptom on a scale from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates 'symptom has not been present', 1 'the symptom was present and resulted in mild discomfort', 2 '...

moderate discomfort' and 3 '... severe discomfort'. A final score is calculated by adding each item, "15" is the worst, "0" the best outcome.

4-week follow-up
Treatment adherence to oral iron therapy
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Units: %. Treatment adherence is measured as the proportion of oral iron tablets that the participant actually has taken in relation to the total number of tablets prescribed.
4-week follow-up
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up

Patient-specific data for resource usage are collected. Hospital resources are recorded for each individual patient from the time of randomisation until follow-up visit four weeks postoperatively:

  • study drug costs
  • units of allogeneic red blood cell transfused
  • length of hospital stay (in days)
  • length of stay in the intensive care unit (in days)
  • readmission to hospital (in days)
  • visits to outpatient clinic Costs associated with health care utilization are calculated by multiplying volumes of resources used by unit costs of that item.
4-week follow-up
Quality of Recovery Score (QoR9-questionnaire)
Time Frame: 4-week follow-up
Quality of recovery (QoR) is assessed with the QoR-9 questionnaire. The QoR-9 is a patient rated score developed and validated to measure the quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. This nine item instrument can be completed by patients in less than two minutes, has a maximum score of 18 and a minimum score of 0. Lesser scores indicate worse outcome.
4-week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Kremke, MD, Aarhus University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Ferric Derisomaltose

3
Subscribe