PanDirect: Self-care Tools and Telephone Coaching for Depression and Anxiety During Pandemics

September 20, 2021 updated by: Mark Yaffe, St. Mary's Research Center, Canada

Assisting Family Physicians With Gaps in Mental Health Care Generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial

During pandemics older adults with chronic physical conditions are a particularly vulnerable population for unmet mental health needs. This is a consequence of a number of factors which include decreased access to their doctors because of restrictions in visits in order to decrease risk of disease transmission and because doctors are seconded to provide medical services in areas of high priority. Since Public Health authorities worry that pandemics may be a reality of the future, this study is being operationalized during the present COVID-19 pandemic in order to see what can be learned about different ways to provide mental health care under such constraints.

The study offers evidence-based approaches to managing feelings of anxiety or depression that may have existed prior to the onset of a pandemic, or that have arisen during a pandemic. It uses principles of cognitive behavioural therapy in which participants are offered self-care tools to help them develop strategies for dealing with their various symptoms. These tools have already been shown by the team to be effective in other contexts in studies DIRECT-sc (Effectiveness of a supported self-care intervention for depression compared to an unsupported intervention in older adults with chronic physical illnesses) and CanDIRECT (Effectiveness of a telephone-supported depression self-care intervention for cancer survivors).

The present study, PanDIRECT (Assisting Family Physicians with Gaps in Mental Health Care Generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic), aims to answer the following questions:

  1. Can these tools be used in the community care of mental health problems during pandemics?
  2. Are they acceptable to patients?
  3. Using a randomized control trial, does lay-coaching of use of these tools improve their use and patient outcomes?
  4. Do family practitioners value patient information sent to them at the end of the trial

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montréal, Canada
        • St Mary's Hospital Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 65+ years old
  • consented to be recontacted (participant in a previous study)

Exclusion criteria:

  • moderate to severe cognitive impairment (using BOMC a brief cognitive screen) -unable to read in English or French (self-reported); hearing impairment (as judged by research staff);
  • currently receiving counseling or psychological therapy (as these treatments may conflict with the self-care interventions)
  • currently living in a long term care or other medicalized facility,
  • presenting suicidal intent (as identified through the final item of the PHQ-9 which will be asked at screening).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: self-care tools

Arms Assigned Interventions Experimental: self-care tools

The tools are adapted from those successfully deployed in the DIRECTsc depression self-care project focusing on patients with depressive symptoms, but abbreviated to meet the needs of the proposed short-term intervention for a broader sample of patients to include those with anxiety symptoms and with minimal symptoms. Tools will include individual chapters of the Antidepressant Skills Workbook; the mood monitoring tool; a workbook on managing worry; relaxation audio files and information on exercise and healthy eating. In view of the short duration of the intervention (8 weeks), a maximum of 2 tools will be sent to each participant.

An algorithm will determine which self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants, will be sent to the participants.

self-care tools only
Experimental: coaching
Participants will receive the algorithm-determined self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants as in the first arm. They will ALSO be offered up to 3 coach calls. Coaching by a trained lay coach will be structured and guided by a manual. Trained lay coaches will call participants in the week following delivery of the toolkit to guide them through the self-care toolkit over an 8-week period. Coaches will contact participants a maximum of 3 times, with calls expected to average 15-20 minutes. Call content will be guided by a structured coaching manual adapted from those used in the team's previous two RCTs of the self-care materials. The coaches will follow structured agendas, keep records of all contacts.
self-care tools only
coaching

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consent rate
Time Frame: At recruitment
Number of consenting participants out of total number contacted over the recruitment period
At recruitment
Data completion rate
Time Frame: From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (4 months)
Investigators will report on rates of missing data from baseline and follow-up questionnaires
From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (4 months)
Fidelity of intervention completion
Time Frame: A 8 week follow-up
Logs and checklists will be used to evaluate completion of intervention, as per protocol
A 8 week follow-up
Severity of depression symptoms
Time Frame: At baseline
Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression
At baseline
Severity of depression symptoms
Time Frame: At 8 week follow-up
Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression
At 8 week follow-up
Severity of anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: At baseline
Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety
At baseline
Severity of anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: At 8 week follow-up
Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety
At 8 week follow-up
Use of health care services
Time Frame: At baseline
Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services
At baseline
Use of health care services
Time Frame: At 8 week follow-up
Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services
At 8 week follow-up
Use of the self-care materials
Time Frame: At 8 week follow-up
Using adherence questions developed by the team, not scored
At 8 week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMHC-20-10

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness 1

Clinical Trials on self-care tools

Subscribe