The Effects of HRV Biofeedback on Chronic Kidney Disease Patient.

March 21, 2023 updated by: Yu-Ju Chen, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan

Effects of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback to Improve Automatic Nervous Function, Inflammatory Response, Physiological and Psychological Symptom Distress in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease:A Randomized Control Trial

The prevalence and incidence of end-stage renal disease in Taiwan ranks highest in the world, and it is based on the 2018 health welfare According to statistics from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, kidney disease is the ninth leading cause of death in Taiwan. As the course of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progresses, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, inflammation, and physical and psychological symptoms (such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depression) will increase, which will further damage the structure and function of the kidney Intensified, increasing the demand for dialysis treatment and the risk of cardiovascular disease, which consumes social and medical costs. If the investigators can intervene in a feasible measure to effectively regulate the autonomic nervous function of CKD patients, reduce inflammation and physical and psychological symptoms, and delay the progression of the disease, it will be the main goal of caring for CKD patients. To explore the intervention of heart rate variability biofeedback, which can improve the autonomic nervous function (heart rate variability [Heart Rate Variability]), inflammatory response (interleukin-6 [Interleukin-6, IL-6], C-reactive protein [ C reaction protein, CRP]) and physical and psychological symptoms (such as reducing fatigue, sleep disturbance and depression).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study adopts an experimental research design and convenient sampling method. It is accepted in the nephrology clinic of a northern medical center in Taiwan. It is estimated that 80 patients will be enrolled. After the patients have signed the consent form, use the sealed envelope website (http://www.sealedenvelope.com) will randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group receive HRV biofeedback for four consecutive weeks, combined with eight-week StressEraser home practice; the control group received general routine care. Both groups of cases were repeated three times on the day of acceptance, one month and three months after the case were accepted, a total of three repeated measurements of physiological indicators (HRV, IL-6, CRP) and symptom scales (Piper Fatigue Scale, Chinese version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Table, the second edition of the Chinese version of the Baker Depression Scale) to evaluate the effectiveness of HRV biofeedback. The research results will be statistically analyzed with SPSS version 23.0, and with descriptive statistics, the distribution of basic demographic data and the measurement results of various indicators will be analyzed. Paired-sample t-test, independent-sample t-test, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to analyze the statistical results of intervention effectiveness inference; the significance level was set to 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • Tri-Service Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of chronic kidney disease
  2. Clear consciousness
  3. able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese
  4. no urgency in the past three months
  5. No hospitalization record in the past three months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. arrhythmia
  2. with pacemaker
  3. those with visual or hearing impairments that cannot be corrected and hinder communication
  4. receiving dialysis treatment
  5. receiving kidneys Transplant recipients
  6. history of rheumatic immune disease or cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: control group
routine care
Experimental: experimental group
HRV biofeedback
Heart rate variability biological feedback training is carried out in the outpatient meeting room of the hospital, including once a week, 30 minutes of hospital training each time, using Medea physiological feedback device portable Bluetooth physiological signal Feedback system (Medical Device Input No. 027390). Designed as two stages, stage one (the first week) first teaches the subject how to perform abdominal breathing, and connects the physiological feedback device to monitor the patient's breathing and heart rate changes, and sets the breath per minute according to the subject's resonance frequency . Stage two (second-four weeks) guide the case to understand the resonance relationship between breathing and heart rate, and then achieve the effect of matching heart and breath. It is also equipped with a pressure relief device (Helico Inc., New York, NY, USA) for self-practice at home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
autonomic nerve function
Time Frame: baseline
heart rate variability index
baseline
autonomic nerve function
Time Frame: 1 month
heart rate variability index
1 month
autonomic nerve function
Time Frame: 3 month
heart rate variability index
3 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
inflammatory response 1
Time Frame: baseline
C reaction protein, CRP(ng/ml)
baseline
inflammatory response 2
Time Frame: baseline
Interleukin-6, IL-6(pg/ml)
baseline
inflammatory response 1
Time Frame: 1 month
C reaction protein, CRP(ng/ml)
1 month
inflammatory response 2
Time Frame: 1 month
Interleukin-6, IL-6(pg/ml)
1 month
inflammatory response 1
Time Frame: 3 month
C reaction protein, CRP(ng/ml)
3 month
inflammatory response 2
Time Frame: 3 month
Interleukin-6, IL-6(pg/ml)
3 month
symptom distress(fatigue)
Time Frame: baseline
Piper fatigue scale(Chinese version): Likert's four-point quantitative scale is scored, calculated on a scale of 0-3, with a total score of 0-48. The higher the score, the more serious the fatigue.
baseline
symptom distress(sleep)
Time Frame: baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
baseline
symptom distress(depression)
Time Frame: baseline
Beck Depression Inventory-II
baseline
symptom distress(fatigue)
Time Frame: 1 month
Piper fatigue scale(Chinese version): Likert's four-point quantitative scale is scored, calculated on a scale of 0-3, with a total score of 0-48. The higher the score, the more serious the fatigue.
1 month
symptom distress(sleep)
Time Frame: 1 month
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
1 month
symptom distress(depression)
Time Frame: 1 month
Beck Depression Inventory-II
1 month
symptom distress(fatigue)
Time Frame: 3 month
Piper fatigue scale(Chinese version): Likert's four-point quantitative scale is scored, calculated on a scale of 0-3, with a total score of 0-48. The higher the score, the more serious the fatigue.
3 month
symptom distress(sleep)
Time Frame: 3 month
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
3 month
symptom distress(depression)
Time Frame: 3 month
Beck Depression Inventory-II
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: YU-CHAN LIN, master, Tri-Service Medical Center Nurse
  • Principal Investigator: CHIA-PEI Chen, graduate student

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 18, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 18, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Diseases

Clinical Trials on heart rate variability biofeedback

3
Subscribe