Low or High Botox Dilution for the Hemiplegic Gait?

December 4, 2024 updated by: Avraam Ploumis, University of Ioannina

Different Dilutions and Efficacy of Botulin Toxin in the Correction of the Hemiplegic Gait

There is debate regarding the efficiency of different dilutions of Botulin toxin type A (BTX-A) injections. Some authors believe that highly diluted BTX-A injections achieve greater neuromuscular blockade resulting in higher spasticity reduction. On the other hand, other researchers suggest that there is no difference in spasticity decrease if either high or low volume toxin is being injected. Studies on this subject lack either the design or the power of study was low. Therefore, there is no clear guideline for an optimal botulinum toxin dilution protocol. In an attempt to have a better understanding, a cross over study was designed. The material will be patients with spastic hemiparesis which will be treated with Botulin toxin at different dilutions. Gait analysis will be used for the evaluation of the Botulin toxin injection on gait improvement. To the best of our knowledge such a trial hasn't been performed yet.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is an ongoing controversy regarding the effect of different dilutions in the efficacy of Botulin toxin type A (BTX-A) injections. Some authors believe that highly diluted BTX-A injections achieve greater neuromuscular blockade resulting in higher spasticity reduction. They are arguing that BTX-A in high dilution is the optimal choice especially when bigger muscles are injected, for the large volume of fluid administered into the muscle will carry the BTX-A molecules to endplates remote from the injection site. Two animal studies suggest that increasing the volume of diluents is a potential strategy in order to achieve a more efficient and cost-effective manner of BTX-A treatment. An attempt to quantify how the location of BTX-A injection affects the drug effect was made, which revealed that injecting only 0.5 cm away from the motor endplates yielded a 50% decrease in paralysis2. A newer double-blinded study by JM Gracies et al performed on humans comes to the same conclusion, that high volume dilution provides greater neuromuscular block and spasticity reduction than a low volume dilution. On the other hand, other researchers suggest that there is no difference in spasticity decrease if either high or low volume toxin is being injected.

Previous studies lack either the design or the power of study was low. Therefore, there is no clear guideline for an optimal botulinum toxin dilution protocol.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ioannina, Greece, 45100
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Ioannina
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • equinovarus deformity
  • with an average 3 on Ashworth spasticity scale
  • able to walk indoors either freely or with a cane.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients suffering from any mental illness that would disturb the gait pattern
  • patients suffering from musculoskeletal diseases that overtly interfere with the gait

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: LOW-HIGH VOLUME
Initially a low volume of the drug (100IU botulinum toxin diluted in 2 ml) after a safe washout period of 6 months the same patients will be injected with a high volume (100IU botulinum toxin in 4 ml) of the drug.
The triceps surae along with the posterior tibialis muscle will be injected. The units that will be injected are the average being injected in our University Clinic. I.e. 50 units for each head of the gastrocnemius muscle- single injection site, 100 units for the soleus muscle- two injection sites and 50 units for the posterior tibialis muscle- single injection site.
The gait analysis will be performed with two systems. A foot pressure sensitivity walkway (medicapteurs Win-Track), and an IMU network system (RehaGait Pro) using seven IMU's placed in specific anatomical positions. In combination those two systems can provide a wide range of spatiotemporal analytics of gait:
Other Names:
  • medicapteurs Win-Track
  • RehaGait Pro
Experimental: HIGH-LOW VOLUME
initially a high volume of the drug (100IU botulinum toxin diluted in 4 ml) after a safe washout period of 6 months the same patients will be injected with a low volume (100IU botulinum toxin in 2 ml) of the drug.
The triceps surae along with the posterior tibialis muscle will be injected. The units that will be injected are the average being injected in our University Clinic. I.e. 50 units for each head of the gastrocnemius muscle- single injection site, 100 units for the soleus muscle- two injection sites and 50 units for the posterior tibialis muscle- single injection site.
The gait analysis will be performed with two systems. A foot pressure sensitivity walkway (medicapteurs Win-Track), and an IMU network system (RehaGait Pro) using seven IMU's placed in specific anatomical positions. In combination those two systems can provide a wide range of spatiotemporal analytics of gait:
Other Names:
  • medicapteurs Win-Track
  • RehaGait Pro

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Ankle motion from baseline to 1 month postinjection
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection
range of motion of ankle during gait
Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection
Change of modifies Ashworth scale (from 0 to 4, higher grade means worse spasticity) of the ankle from baseline to 1 month postinjection
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection
spasticity measurement
Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection
Change of standing balance from baseline to 1 month postinjection
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection
measuring the ground force position when standing
Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection
Change of walking balance from baseline to 1 month postinjection
Time Frame: Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection
measuring the ground force position when walking
Day 1 (baseline) and at 1 month postinjection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Stroke Spastic Hemiplegia

Clinical Trials on Botulinum toxin

Subscribe