Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CAF With Either SCTG and Vitamin C Versus SCTG Alone in Management of RT1 Gingival Recession

November 16, 2020 updated by: Andrew Albert Anwar Zaki, Cairo University

Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Coronally Advanced Flap With Either Subepithelial Connective Tissue and Vitamin C Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Alone in Management of RT1 Gingival Recession

Compare gingival thickness following CAF With SCTG and Vitamin C Versus SCTG Alone in Management of RT1 Gingival Recession.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Control group (coronally advanced flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft alone) Test group (coronally advanced flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft using microsurgical approach) Same procedure will be executed but with the addition of vitamin C injection. Intraepidermal injection (oral mesotherapy technique) of 1-1.5 ml (200-300 mg concentration) of L-ascorbic acid will be done. It will be locally introduced in relation to the keratinized gingival tissues with extension to the whole target region successively using special syringes (30 gauge). The needle will be introduced parallel to the gingival tissues with the bevel facing upwards. Vitamin C will then be delivered through the attached gingival tissues at the epithelium-connective tissue junction (equivalent to epidermal- dermal junction) till the tissues blanch. Vitamin C will be injected first time immediately postsurgical and then repeated once per week for 3 consecutive weeks for a total of 4 injections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients 18 years or older.
  2. Periodontally and systemically healthy.
  3. Buccal recession defects classified as Cairo RT1.
  4. Presence of identifiable CEJ (Zucchelli et al., 2010).
  5. Clinical indication and/or patient request for recession coverage.
  6. O'Leary index less than 20% (O'Leary, Drake and Naylor, 1972).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cairo RT2 or RT3 recession defects.
  2. Pregnant females.
  3. Smokers as smoking is a contraindication for any periodontal plastic surgery (Khuller, 2009).
  4. Handicapped and mentally retarded patients.
  5. Patients undergoing radiotherapy.
  6. Teeth with cervical restorations, abrasion and malalignment.
  7. Presence of systemic disease that would affect wound healing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CAF with SCTG and vitamin C
Coronally advanced flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft and vitamin C.
Injection of vitamin C after CAF with SCTG aiming to increase gingival thickness in patients with RT1 gingival recession.
Active Comparator: CAF with SCTG
Coronally advanced flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Coronally advanced flap with subepithelial connective tissue graft.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ginigval thickness
Time Frame: 6 months
Determined 2 mm apical to the gingival margin with a short needle for anesthesia and a 3 mm diameter silicon disk stop. The needle is inserted perpendicular to the mucosal surface, through the soft tissues with light pressure until a hard surface is felt. The silicon disk stop is then placed in tight contact with the soft tissue surface with the coronal border overlapping the soft tissue margin. As the needle is located in the center of the silicon disk, measurement of GT is performed 2 mm apical from the gingival margin. Once in the correct position, the disk is fixed with a drop of cyanocrylic adhesive; after careful removal of the needle, the penetration depth is measured with a caliper accurate to the nearest 0.1 mm.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Root Coverage Esthetic Score
Time Frame: 6 months
A system proposed for evaluating esthetic outcomes of root coverage procedures. The RES system evaluated five variables at 6-months after surgery: the level of the gingival margin, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, MGJ alignment, and gingival color.
6 months
Early Healing Index
Time Frame: 6 months
A system proposed for the clinical assessment of the early wound events by using a differentiated early wound healing index (EHI) (Wachtel et al., 2003).
6 months
Gingival Recession Depth (RD)
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured from the CEJ to the most apical extension of the gingival margin.
6 months
Gingival Recession Width (RW)
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured horizontally between the borders of the recession at the level of CEJ.
6 months
Percentage of root coverage
Time Frame: 6 months
(Preoperative vertical recession - Postoperative vertical recession/preoperative vertical recession) x 100.
6 months
Probing Depth (PD)
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
6 months
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured from the CEJ to the bottom of the gingival sulcus.
6 months
Height of Keratinized Tissue (KTH)
Time Frame: 6 months

Measured as the distance between the gingival margin and the mucogingival junction (MGJ).

All measurements will be performed by means of the UNC periodontal probe and will be rounded up to the nearest millimeter.

6 months
Post-Operative Pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with numbers from 0 to 10 ('no pain' to 'worst pain imaginable') measured daily for the first 2 weeks postoperatively.
2 weeks
Post-Surgical Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
A 3-item questionnaire is asked and the patients shall use a 7-point answer scale.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gingival Thickness

Clinical Trials on CAF with SCTG and Vitamin C injection

Subscribe