Biomarker-guided Intervention to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury (BigpAK-2)

November 11, 2024 updated by: University Hospital Muenster

Biomarker- Guided Intervention to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury After Major Surgery. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial (BigpAK-2)

There is no specific therapy for acute kidney injury. It is presumed that supportive measures improve the care and outcome of patients with acute kidney injury. The investigators hypothesize that the implementation of a bundle of supportive measures adapted to patients undergoing major surgery reduces the occurrence of AKI.

This randomized prospective multicenter trial is needed to investigator whether the implementation of the bundle of measures is effective to prevent AKI in high risk patients undergoing major surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In earlier studies, interventions to treat acute kidney injury (AKI) were started after a functional damage of the kidneys was already established. However, none of the interventions had an effect in treating AKI. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines recommend implementing different measures in patients at high risk for AKI, but the evidence that the implementation of the bundle (consisting of optimization of hemodynamics and perfusion pressure, avoidance of nephrotoxins and hyperglycemia) can prevent AKI is very weak. Biomarkers can be used to identify patients at high risk for AKI after surgery (prior to the development of AKI). The cell-cycle arrest biomarkers, Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) and Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), have been demonstrated to have the best predictive performance for the development of AKI after surgery as compared to other biomarkers. In addition, these biomarkers are not influenced by different co-morbidities or other clinical situations. In the BigpAK1 trial, which was a single-center trial, the authors investigated whether a biomarker-guided implementation of the KDIGO guidelines can reduce the occurrence of AKI in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. The results demonstrate that the implementation of the KDIGO bundle in high risk patients for AKI ([TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] between 0.3 and 2) significantly reduced the occurrence of AKI compared to the standard of care group. However, this was a single center trial which needs to be confirmed in a large trial. Therefore, based on these data, a definitive, prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter study including 1302 surgical patients at high risk for AKI identified by [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] will be performed.

The goal of this trial is to investigate the effect of the implementation of the KDIGO bundle in patients at high risk for AKI after major surgery compared to standard of care in the same patient population. This biomarker-guided approach (individualized therapy) enables to treat patients at high risk for AKI prior to a functional damage of the kidneys.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
      • Lyon, France
        • Service d´Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Reims, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims
      • Bayreuth, Germany
        • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH
      • Bochum, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum
      • Bonn, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn
      • Dortmund, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Klinikum Dortmund
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital "Carl Gustav Carus", Technische Universität Dresden
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf
      • Essen, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen
      • Göttingen, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital
      • Marburg, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps-University
      • Münster, Germany
        • Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital
      • Münster, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Franziskus Hospital Münster
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen
      • Bologna, Italy
        • IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
      • Ferrara, Italy
        • Department of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, St. Anne's Archbishop Hospital, University of Ferrara
      • Firenze, Italy
        • Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Section of Oncological Anesthesia and Intensive care, Azienda Ospedaliero Careggi
      • Trento, Italy
        • Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, APSS Trento
      • Vicenza, Italy
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, San Bortolo Hospital
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Department of Anaesthesiology, Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology (L.E.I.C.A.), Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Parc de Salut Mar
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital de Igualada
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital 12 de Octubre
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Infanta Leonor University Hospital
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Servicio de Anestesiologia y Reanimación, Hosp. Universitario de La Princesa
      • Santander, Spain
        • Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Adult Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
      • Belfast, United Kingdom
        • Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast
      • Guildford, United Kingdom
        • Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital
      • Harefield, United Kingdom
        • Department of Anaesthetics and Critical Care, Harefield Hospital
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom
        • Intensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Department of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients after major surgery who need to be admitted to the ICU
  • Age > 18 years
  • [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] ≥ 0.3 4-18 hours after surgery
  • Inserted jugular central venous line and a urinary catheter
  • Written informed consent.
  • At least one additional risk factor for AKI

    1. Age > 75 years
    2. Critical illness such as ongoing requirement of vasopressor support and/or mechanical ventilation postoperatively
    3. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease (eGFR<60ml/min)
    4. Intraoperative use of radio contrast agents.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Pre- existing high stages of chronic kidney disease (stage 4 or 5 i.e. eGFR < 15 ml/ min)
  • Kidney transplant within the last 12 month
  • Known (Glomerulo-) Nephritis, interstitial nephritis or vasculitis
  • Anuria at inclusion time
  • Preexisting AKI
  • Renal replacement therapy (RRT) within the last 90 days
  • Indication for renal replacement at the time of inclusion
  • Participation in another intervention trial that investigates a drug/intervention that affects kidney function
  • Persons held in an institution by legal or official order
  • Persons with any kind of dependency on the investigator or employed by the responsible institution or investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Experimental: Intervention group

Implementation of the KDIGO bundle for at least 12 hours

  1. discontinuation of all nephrotoxic drugs when possible
  2. optimization of volume status and hemodynamic parameters (consideration of a functional hemodynamic monitoring)
  3. close monitoring of serum creatinine, fluid balance and urinary output
  4. avoidance of hyperglycemia
  5. considerations of alternatives to radiocontrast agents
  6. discontinuation of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the perioperative period
  7. avoidance of HES, gelatin, and chlorid-rich solutions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Occurence of moderate or severe AKI
Time Frame: 72 hours after start of intervention
72 hours after start of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to the implementation of the KDIGO-bundle
Time Frame: 72 hours after start of intervention

Number of patients in whom

  • Nephrotoxic agents were discontinued
  • Optimal volume status and perfusion pressure were ensured
  • The use of hemodynamic monitoring was considered
  • Serum creatinine and urine output were considered
  • Hyperglycemia was avoided
  • Alternatives to radiocontrast were considered
72 hours after start of intervention
Severity of AKI
Time Frame: 3 days after start of intervention

Severity of AKI as defined by the KDIGO guidelines based on creatinine or urine output parameter:

Stage 1 Creatinine: 1.5-1.9 times baseline OR > 0.3 mg/dl (> 26.5 mmol/l) increase and/or urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/h for 6-12 hours

Stage 2 Creatinine: 2.0-2.9 times baseline and/or urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/h for >= 12 hours

Stage 3 Creatinine: 3.0 times baseline OR Increase in serum creatinine to >= 4.0 mg/dl (>= 353.6 mmol/l) OR Initiation of renal replacement therapy OR, In patients < 18 years, decrease in eGFR to < 35 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and/or urine output < 0.3 ml/kg/h for >= 24 hour

3 days after start of intervention
Changes in biomarker values
Time Frame: 12 hours after start of intervention
Difference between the 12 h after initial measuring and the initial measuring [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] value
12 hours after start of intervention
Free-days of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: up to 3 days after start of intervention
up to 3 days after start of intervention
Free-days of vasopressors
Time Frame: up to 3 days after start of intervention
up to 3 days after start of intervention
Need of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: up to 30 days after start of intervention
up to 30 days after start of intervention
Need of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: up to 90 days after start of intervention
up to 90 days after start of intervention
Duration of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: up to 30 days after start of intervention
up to 30 days after start of intervention
Duration of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: up to 90 days after start of intervention
up to 90 days after start of intervention
Renal recovery
Time Frame: up to 90 days after start of intervention
renal recovery is defined as complete recovery: serum creatinine levels < 0.5 mg/dl higher than baseline serum creatinine (creatinine level before surgery), partial recovery: serum creatinine > 0.5 mg/dl higher than baseline but not dialysis-dependence; non-recovery: patients who remained dialysis dependent
up to 90 days after start of intervention
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after start of intervention
30 days after start of intervention
Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days after start of intervention
90 days after start of intervention
ICU and hospital stay
Time Frame: up to 90 days after start of intervention (until discharge)
up to 90 days after start of intervention (until discharge)
Major adverse kidney events (MAKE)
Time Frame: up to 90 days after start of intervention
- major adverse kidney events consisting of mortality, dialysis dependency persistent renal dysfunction (defined as serum creatinine ≥ 2x to baseline value at hospital discharge)
up to 90 days after start of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Zarbock, MD, University Hospital Muenster, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 9, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Kidney Injury

Subscribe