Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Height Gain With Dental Implant Placed Simultaneously With Closed Sinus Lifting Using Hydraulic Lift Technique Versus Summers' Osteotome Technique in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla (RCT)

November 23, 2020 updated by: Hassan Mohammad, Cairo University

Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Height Gain With Dental Implant Placed Simultaneously With Closed Sinus Lifting Using Hydraulic Lift Technique Versus Summers' Osteotome Technique in Posterior Edentulous Maxilla (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Radiographic evaluation of bone height gain with dental implant placed simultaneously with closed sinus lifting using hydraulic lift technique versus summers' osteotome technique in posterior edentulous maxilla (RCT)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Evaluation will be done on the amount of bone height gain radiographically (using both panorama and CBCT) after placement of the dental implant simultaneously with closed sinus lifting using hydraulic lift technique versus summers' osteotome technique in patients with posterior edentulous maxilla (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt, 12613
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Edentulous patients in the maxillary posterior region .
  • Patients in need to fixed restorations in posterior region .
  • Patients with a healthy systemic conditions.(Apparently medically free)
  • Patients with adequate inter-arch space for placement of the prosthetic part of the implant .
  • Patients who had approximately 5-8 mm of available bone height between crest of bone and floor of sinus
  • Both sexes.
  • Patients with Good oral hygiene
  • Patients more than 20 years old
  • Cooperative and motivated patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with local pathological defects related to posterior maxilla .
  • Heavy smokers.
  • Abnormal habits that may alter results such as alcoholism or parafuctional habits .
  • Patients with systemic diseases that may affect normal healing.
  • Patients with psychiatric problem
  • Patients with history of recent radiation therapy to the head and neck area .
  • Patients with aggressive periodontitis .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Using of bone osteotomes for closed sinus lifting
Using of summers' osteotome technique by bone osteotomes for closed sinus lifting then evaluation the amount of bone height gain will be done radiographically (by panorama and CBCT) after implant placement in posterior edentulous maxilla .
Using of recent closed minimally invasive technique (hydraulic left technique) by hydraulic lifter device for closed sinus lifting then evaluation of the amount of bone height gain will be done radiographically (by panorama and CBCT) after implant placement for patients with posterior edentulous maxilla .
Active Comparator: Patient satisfaction evaluation after using bone osteotomes
Evaluation of patient satisfaction numerically will be done after using summers' osteotome technique by bone osteotomes for closed sinus lifting in posterior edentulous maxilla
Evaluation of patient satisfaction numerically will be done after using hydraulic lift technique by hydraulic lifter device for closed sinus lifting in posterior edentulous maxilla

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Amount of bone height change
Time Frame: 6 months
Evaluation of the amount of bone height change radiographically after closed sinus lift simultaneously with implant placement using hydraulic lift technique versus summers' osteotome technique in posterior edentulous maxilla
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction numerical questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months

Evaluation of patient satisfaction by using specific numerical questionnaire which depends on numerical scale after closed sinus lifting procedure with implant placement using hydraulic lift technique versus summers' osteotome technique in posterior edentulous maxilla .

The patient satisfaction numerical questionnaire include several questions to the patient and the patient will put a circle sign on the mark at which he or she feels to represent the answer .

The numerical scale is from 1 to 5 for each question (with total of 20 questions) :

  1. represents strongly disagree
  2. represents disagree
  3. represents neither agree or disagree
  4. represents agree
  5. represents strongly agree

The final score is out of 100 so, more higher scores represents more patient satisfaction and so, better outcome and less scores represents less patient satisfaction and so, worse outcome.

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hassan Abdelghany, PHD, Assoc.professor of oral and maxillofacial surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 7920

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Evaluations, Diagnostic Self

Clinical Trials on Using of hydraulic lifter device for closed sinus lifting

Subscribe