Comparison of Cyriax Manipulation and Decompression in LDP

November 28, 2020 updated by: Riphah International University

Comparison the Effect of Cyriax Manipulation and Decompression in Patient With Lumber Disc Protrusion

In this study, compare the effects of Cyriax manipulation and Decompression in patient with lumber disc prolapseThis research will provide an important addition to the evidence based treatment intervention in physical therapy in the field of manipulation as there is no such research work have been done on comparative study of cyriax manipulation and decompression in lumber disc protrusion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

According to an estimate, 70 to 80% of the adult population will experience a clinically relevant episode of LBP at some time in their lives. Within the vast differential of LBP, the most common source is intervertebral degeneration leading to degenerative disc disease and LDH. The efficacy of manipulative physical therapy, physical therapy intervention and therapy by general practitioner (GP) for persistent general LBP and neck pain was investigated on 256 patients how didn't received any of the above therapy in last two years were contained in this study. Physical therapy included workout exercises, massage, and physical therapy (related to hot pack, different pain modalities like therapeutic ultrasound, shortwave diathermy, and electrotherapy). Manual therapy includes manual reduction by manipulation and mobilization of the back. Interventions received by GP is medicine related (different types of pain killer and muscles relaxant), guidance about the posture, home plan exercises and different healthy activities and proper rest. Placebo intervention included adjustable shortwave diathermy session for (10 minutes), and adjusted therapeutic ultrasound session for (10 minutes). Recovery rate in the leading complaint was increased with the group receiving manual therapy intervention (4.5) as compare to physical therapy (3.8), after a detailed one year of continuous therapy. There is a great progression seen in physical work by manual therapy. Moreover, manipulation is get going improved gradually, as compare to physiotherapy following in period of 12 months.

The first meta-analysis estimated the efficacy of SMT for LBP due to LDH with other therapies come to the result that SMT was equally effective when compare to other traditional therapies. However a past systematic review was come to the conclusion that SMT was secure and effective in relation to its costs for managing SLDD like LDH, that conclusion was quoted to promote by a very few publications.

One of the present research studies after one year of continuation showed decrease in pain and increase in recreational activities to a long period of time, an additional research work in 2016 described, a remarkable progression in sciatica after 30 days, in patients with lumber discs extrusion and sequestration, as a result of HVLA thrust.

In spite of the factor that there is only average numbers of documentation in the written work which promoted the utilization of SMT to manage LDH, it is extensively applied by therapist.

the comparison of cyriax manipulation and decompresion is an important adding to the researches in evidence based practices. there is no such work done before on comparison of both intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab
      • Islamabad, Punjab, Pakistan, 44080
        • Max health hospital and rehab center G8 islamabad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having Lumber disc prolapse of L1-L5 and S1 (both gender)
  • Patients having MRI reports of protruded disc

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory condition( systemic inflammatory disease of spine)
  • Spinal diseases (other than Musculoskeletal)
  • Severe radiculopathies (bilateral)
  • Operated patients (spine)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: cyriax manipulation
cyriax manipulation have three types of classes, rotation, extension and anti-deviation, which is further divided into subclasses. On the inferior level of lumber spine L4-L5 and L5-S1rotation intervention of manipulation are capable of having striking effects of decreasing herniation. First of all we have to perform the simple 'stretch' on lumber spine, which is being the little rotation pressure applied on the body. The patient position of the body is in side lying with the effected side upward so that the outside part of the joint are separated easily on the involved side. After that, whenever it is essential by making use of femur as a rigid bar or support, this maneuver is go along with powerful rotation technique.
Other: cyriax manipulation lumber

In group A patients were treated with conservative therapy (hot pack, Kaltenborn soft tissue techniques and home plan) and Cyriax manipulation.

Exercises (Guided low back exercises, 3-5times/day). Ankle pumping (5-10 repetition with 15-20 second hold), Quads Isometric (5-10 repetition with 15-20 second hold), Hams & Calf stretching (5-10 repetition with 15-20 second hold), Bridging (5-10 repetition with 15-20 second hold), Prone Back extension (10 repetition) Precaution Prevent yourself from sitting low on ground, Sitting with support will be directed and be careful during driving and ascending stairs.

Cyriax Manipulation: 2-3 repetitions/session, 2 session/week Lumbar spinal manipulation Rotation Techniques Lumbar spinal manipulation Extension Techniques Lumbar spinal manipulation Antideviation Techniques total of 4 session were given. 2 session/week.
Experimental: lumber decompresion
Spinal decompression therapy has been developed a treatment without surgery for the prolapsed disc and deteriorative spinal disc disease one of the considerable reason for low back pain. This noninvasive interventional treatment for herniated disc and deteriorative disc diseases operated on the principle of remarkably decreasing the pressure on the disc between vertebras.
Other: lumber decompression

Group B: In group B patients were treated with conservative therapy (hot pack, Kaltenborn soft tissue techniques and home plan) and Decompression Session.

Conservative therapy: Same as Group A

Lumbar spine decompression:

30 Minutes Session (generalized time for every one) . On the account of MRI description level is recommended and acknowledged by MRI the level of disc protrusion, decompression is operated. Patient is lying on table facing upward. For locking of the patient's body it was secured by pelvis and thoracic straps. One part of the decompression table is immobile other is movable. Bottom extreme part of the table is mobile.

Estimation of weight of patient is first thing to do. We calculated it by division of whole weight by 5 and that 5th segment of weight was utilized as an interventional pound for decompression. .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inclinometer
Time Frame: 2nd week
Inclinometer: Dual inclinometer is used to measure dynamic ROM of lumber spine. For measuring the ROM of flexion, extension and side bending to both sides, place one inclinometer on T12 and the other on S1. Ask the patient to bend forward for flexion, bend backward for extension and sideways for side bending. Note both the readings and subtract the lower one from the above.
2nd week
goniometer
Time Frame: 2nd week
Goniometer is used to measure SLR range before and after the treatment For the patients to perform SLR, participants lay supine on a table and are asked to actively raise their leg from the table while keeping their knee straight. Reproduction of the patient's characteristic pain or demonstration of weakness can lead to decreased range of SLR. Symptom production between the ranges of 30 degrees to 60 degrees is an indication of disc pathology.
2nd week
Numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: 2nd week
Numeric pain rating scale: Pain is measured by NPRS before Treatment and after treatment. The NPRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the pain where zero is no pain and 10 is maximum pain (for back and leg)
2nd week
Oswestry disability index (ODI)
Time Frame: 2nd week
Oswestry disability index (ODI): Disability is measured by ODI before Treatment and after treatment. It is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools. it consist of 10, five parts sections. at the end,s core is calculated by dividing the obtained score by total 50, and multiplied by 100. as the sexual section is missing due to ethical reason so total score is 45 instead of 50.
2nd week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Riphah International University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Affan Iqbal, Phd*, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/00681 Salma Bibi

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Disc Herniation

Clinical Trials on cyriax manipulation lumber

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Belarus

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe