Aerosol Particle Concentrations Among Different Oxygen Devices for Spontaneous Breathing Patients With Tracheostomy

November 21, 2022 updated by: Jie Li

Aerosol Particle Concentrations Among Different Oxygen Devices for Spontaneous Breathing Patients With Tracheostomy: a Randomized Cross-over Trial

For spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy, whose lower airway is directly opened to the room air, the aerosol particles generated by the patients would be directly dispersed into the room air, which might be an direct resource of virus transmission. However, the transmission risk has not been evaluated and the appropriate humidification therapy is unknown. Thus this study is aimed to investigate the aerosol particle concentrations among different oxygen devices for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy, in order to reflect the transmission risk.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The transmission route of the SARS-CoV-2 virus remains controversial, and concerns persist of potentially increased virus transmission when utilizing high-flow devices and aerosol devices among COVID-19 patients. For spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy, whose lower airway is directly opened to the room air, the aerosol particles generated by the patients would be directly dispersed into the room air, which might be an direct resource of virus transmission. However, the transmission risk of tracheostomy during spontaneous breathing has not been evaluated and the appropriate humidification therapy is unknown. Thus this study is aimed to investigate the aerosol particle concentrations among different oxygen devices for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy, in order to reflect the transmission risk.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults;
  • tracheostomy;
  • able to spontaneous breathing without ventilator support

Exclusion Criteria:

  • confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 within recent two weeks;
  • non-English speaking;
  • refuse to participate in the study;
  • palliative care;
  • receiving ECMO;
  • unable to connect with tracheostomy adapter, such as laryngectomy tube

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: high-flow high humidity oxygen device with tracheostomy adapter
This device provides high-flow gas to tracheostomy patients with heat and humidification. A special adapter is used to connect the tracheostomy tube and circuit.
This device can provide heat and humidified gas for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy at a high gas flow rate.
Other Names:
  • Airvo2, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd
Active Comparator: large-volume nebulizer (cool aerosol) with trach collar
This device is the conventional device that is commonly utilized to provide humidification for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy.
This device can provide heat and humidified gas for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy at a high gas flow rate.
Other Names:
  • Airvo2, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd
Placebo Comparator: Venturi-adapter with trach collar
This device did not provide any humidification but only oxygen
This device can provide heat and humidified gas for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy at a high gas flow rate.
Other Names:
  • Airvo2, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd
Experimental: large-volume nebulizer (cool aerosol) with T-piece and a filter
this device is added with a filter, in order to reduce aerosol particle concentrations in the surrounding environment
This device can provide heat and humidified gas for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy at a high gas flow rate.
Other Names:
  • Airvo2, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd
Experimental: high-flow high humidity device with a scavenger or a surgical mask
this device is added with a scavenger or a surgical mask over the adapter, in order to reduce aerosol particle concentrations in the surrounding environment
This device can provide heat and humidified gas for spontaneous breathing patients with tracheostomy at a high gas flow rate.
Other Names:
  • Airvo2, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aerosol Particle Concentrations With Size of 1-3 Micrometer at 1 Foot Away From the Patient
Time Frame: 5 minutes after using the device
aerosol particle concentrations (the concentrations of particles inside the room air, the unit is particles per cubic meters) at 1 foot away from the patient
5 minutes after using the device
Aerosol Particle Concentrations With Size of <0.3 Micrometer at 1 Foot Away From the Patient
Time Frame: 5 minutes after using the device
aerosol particle concentrations (the concentrations of particles inside the room air, the unit is particles per cubic meters) at 1 foot away from the patient
5 minutes after using the device
Aerosol Particle Concentrations With Size of 0.3-0.5 Micrometer at 1 Foot Away From the Patient
Time Frame: 5 minutes after using the device
aerosol particle concentrations (the concentrations of particles inside the room air, the unit is particles per cubic meters) at 1 foot away from the patient
5 minutes after using the device
Aerosol Particle Concentrations With Size of 0.5-1 Micrometer at 1 Foot Away From the Patient
Time Frame: 5 minutes after using the device
aerosol particle concentrations (the concentrations of particles inside the room air, the unit is particles per cubic meters) at 1 foot away from the patient
5 minutes after using the device
Aerosol Particle Concentrations With Size of 3-5 Micrometer at 1 Foot Away From the Patient
Time Frame: 5 minutes after using the device
aerosol particle concentrations (the concentrations of particles inside the room air, the unit is particles per cubic meters) at 1 foot away from the patient
5 minutes after using the device
Aerosol Particle Concentrations With Size of 5-10 Micrometer at 1 Foot Away From the Patient
Time Frame: 5 minutes after using the device
aerosol particle concentrations (the concentrations of particles inside the room air, the unit is particles per cubic meters) at 1 foot away from the patient
5 minutes after using the device

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Comfort With Different Oxygen Devices
Time Frame: 5 minutes after using the device
Patients would scale their comfort on a 5-point Likert scale, 1 was the most uncomfortable, and 5 was the most comfortable.
5 minutes after using the device

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HFOT-trach-aerosol

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data are available upon reasonable request. Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transmission, Patient-Professional

Clinical Trials on high-flow high humidity oxygen device with tracheostomy adapter

Subscribe