The Relationship Competences Guiding Tool (NarratUN)

August 31, 2022 updated by: Ana Choperena, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra

The Relationship Competences Guiding Tool: A Development, Content Validation and Implementation Study

Aim: The aims of this study are: (1) to present the development, content validation and implementation study of the Relationship Competences Guiding Tool (RCGT); (2) to show some examples of how each of the items of the guide may be reflected on clinical narratives written by nurses, and justify its corresponding scores after the evaluation; (3) to present how the language and content of the narratives are interpreted with this guide and to describe an exemplar; (4) to present barriers and facilitators of its application.

Background: From a person-centred care approach, the fostering of authentic relationships with patients is key for therapeutic benefits. Therefore, it is essential to help nurses to establish meaningful relationships with patients and help them to achieve these abilities. In this line, clinical narratives can be used as a way to promote reflective practice and professional competences development between nurses. A guide to evaluate the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values necessary for developing authentic encounters with patients reflected by nurses on clinical narratives was developed and implemented.

Design: Design and evaluation of the RCGT, and evaluation of its implementation Methods: This study was conducted in three major steps. Step one entailed the conceptualization. Step two included the generation of items and content validation. Then, in step three, the tool was used to independently evaluate 25 narratives by two researchers, in order to identify and exemplify the attributes of the nurse patient relationship defined on the guide and identify barriers and facilitators. One of the narratives was linguistically analysed in the light of the guide, in order to provide a comprehensive view of the interpretative strategies deployed by evaluators.

Results: The RCGT helped to identify nursing professional competences reflected in clinical narratives. The tool guided in the process of assigning scores to the corresponding items. The use of the tool helped to identify some barriers and facilitators before and during the narrative evaluation process.

Conclusions: A clear, relevant, conceptually and linguistically adequate guide for assessing clinical narratives was obtained. The RCGT can be applied to accurately interpret how nurses reflect professional competences in a clinical narrative as a preliminary step to design a measurement tool.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is the first to present a valid guide for interpreting the essential aspects (respect, intentional presence and knowing the person) of the nurse-person relationship using clinical narratives. This is therefore an innovative tool to facilitate the nurses' work in caring patients and families, ensuring the success of a person-centred care for the target population. Moreover, this study describes the rigorous process that has been carried out both for the content validation of the RCGT, as well as for its application by two researchers independently with different backgrounds and perspectives.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain, 31008
        • Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • nurses who agreed to participate and signed informed consent.
  • nurses from different hospitals and clinical departments/services, such as general hospital wards, intensive care units, outpatient services, and other departments (i.e., perioperative, elder care, and haemodialysis, emergency, etc).

Exclusion Criteria:

. other health professionals different from nurses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Writing a clinical narrative
The participants had to write a clinical narrative regarding a significant encounter with a patient.
The participants had to write a clinical narrative regarding a significant encounter with a patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Professional competence 1: respect
Time Frame: One month
The knowledge, skills, attitudes and values necessary for developing respect towards the patient. The Relationship Competences Guiding Tool was used to evaluate this competence.
One month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Professional competence 2: intentional presence
Time Frame: One month
The knowledge, skills, attitudes and values necessary for developing intentional presence towards the patient. The Relationship Competences Guiding Tool was used to evaluate this competence.
One month
Professional competence 3: knowing the person
Time Frame: One month
The knowledge, skills, attitudes and values necessary for knowing the person. The Relationship Competences Guiding Tool was used to evaluate this competence.
One month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana Choperena, PhD, University of Navarra

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020.002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We will not share the clinical narratives. We will use the conclusions of the study for educational purposes.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nurse-Patient Relations

Clinical Trials on Writing a clinical narrative

Subscribe