Individual Differences in Placebo Analgesic Effects

December 2, 2025 updated by: Tor Wager, Trustees of Dartmouth College

Person by Situation Interaction: Matching Suggestions to Participants' Motivational Styles

This study examines the effects of placebo suggestions tailored to match or mismatch individual participants' motivational styles-an issue of person-situation 'fit' with important effects in public health settings, but which has been ignored in past research.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy participants
  • Dominant promotion focus or dominant prevention focus (based on our screening)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently or recently suffered from chronic pain (based on screening)
  • Cannot tolerate heat pain applied to the forearm, based on a calibration task at the beginning of the experiment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo
All participants will participate in two sessions, one with a placebo suggestion that matches the participant's motivational style, and one with placebo suggestion that does not match their motivational style, in a pseudo-random order.
Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "promotion" approach (promoting good feelings).
Over-the-counter hand cream will be applied to participants' skin, but they will be told that they are given a highly efficient topical analgesic cream. The suggestion will be based on a "prevention" approach (preventing pain).
Experimental: Control
Each session will also include a control phase, in which the same cream will be applied, and participants will be instructed that the cream has no analgesic effects.
In a control condition, with the same cream as in the placebo interventions, participants will be instructed that the cream is a control cream with no effects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in subjective ratings of acute thermal pain
Time Frame: Measured repeatedly, immediately after thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Following each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful it was, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher pain ratings. We will average and compare the pain ratings within participant across interventions.
Measured repeatedly, immediately after thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Changes in subjective ratings of pain expectations
Time Frame: Measured repeatedly, immediately before thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Before each thermal stimulus, participants are asked to rate how painful they expect the next stimulus to be, on a semi-circular computerized scale. Ratings are based on the angle (0-180), with higher angle representing higher expectations ratings. We will average and compare the expectation ratings within participant across interventions.
Measured repeatedly, immediately before thermal stimuli on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facial expressions
Time Frame: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
We will obtain facial video recordings of participants with a video camera. We will analyze these data according to Facial Action Units (facial expressions) that are known to be related to pain, and compare them across interventions.
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Thermal imaging of the face
Time Frame: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
We will obtain thermal recordings of participant's face with an infrared camera, and compare the heat signature of the face (the temperature in different parts of the face) across interventions.
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Changes in skin conductance response measured with a Biopac device
Time Frame: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Skin conductance will be measured. We will compare the skin conductance response to pain stimuli within participant across interventions.
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Changes in heart rate measured with a Biopac device
Time Frame: Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.
Heart rate will be measured. We will compare the heart rate in response to pain stimuli within participant across interventions.
Immediate response measured during painful stimulation on the day of participation. Averaged and compared across interventions.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tor D Wager, PhD, Dartmouth College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 230138

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All de-identified data will be publicly shared via public online platforms such as the Open Science Framework (OSF) and Github, and the NIMH Data Archive (NDA), according to the terms and conditions outlined on their website (https://ndar.nih.gov/contribute_data_sharing_regimen.html). Identifying information will not be released, including the facial videos, of which only non-identifiable features will be extracted and shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

All data will be de-identified prior to sharing. Raw data will be submitted to NDA within one year from the end of data collection or 6 months from the acceptance date of the first primary study manuscript on the full dataset (excluding methods development papers), whichever is later. Analyzed data/maps of statistical results and models accompanying each paper will be submitted to NDA/OpenFMRI when the primary study manuscript is accepted.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

These data would generally be made available to any qualified investigator for neuroimaging studies only including:

i. Research on any brain phenomenon; ii. Neuroimaging research on non-disease traits (intelligence, behavioral traits); iii. Methods development research.

The requesting investigator must provide documentation of local IRB approval.

These data would not be made available to:

i. Any criminal justice organization, because data may not be used for any criminal justice applications; ii. Any commercial entity, because use of the data is limited to not-for-profit organizations and data may not be used for any commercial purposes.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Placebo cream- "promotion" suggestion

Subscribe