SCS as an Option for Chronic Low Back and/or Leg Pain Instead of Surgery (SOLIS)

February 21, 2025 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Systems in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back and/or Leg Pain With No Prior Surgeries

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) with multiple modalities compared to Conventional Medical Management (CMM) in patients with chronic low back and/or leg pain who have not undergone spinal surgery when using the Boston Scientific WaveWriter SCS Systems.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

241

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palm Desert, California, United States, 92260
        • Vitamed Research
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States, 95401
        • Summit Pain Alliance
    • Colorado
      • Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States, 80111
        • Denver Back Pain Specialists
    • Florida
      • Clermont, Florida, United States, 34711
        • South Lake Pain Institute, Inc
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66210
        • Crimson Pain Management
    • Louisiana
      • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
        • MedPharmics, LLC
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71105
        • Willis-Knighton River Cities Clinical Research Center
    • Michigan
      • Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States, 48198
        • Forest Health Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63017
        • Saint Louis Pain Consultants
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10022
        • Weill Cornell Medical University
    • North Carolina
      • Huntersville, North Carolina, United States, 28078
        • Carolinas Research Institute, PLLC
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • The Center for Clinical Research
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Novant Health-Hawthorne
    • Ohio
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43623
        • The Toledo Clinic
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Pacific Sports and Spine, LLC
    • Pennsylvania
      • Trevose, Pennsylvania, United States, 19053
        • Delaware Valley Pain and Spine Institute
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29601
        • PCPMG Clinical Research Unit, LLC
    • Texas
      • Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78414
        • Institute of Precision Pain Medicine
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75701
        • Precision Spine Care
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah Orthopaedic Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic low back pain, with or without leg pain, for at least 6 months
  • Received at least 90 days of documented pain management care to address the primary pain complaint, prior to Screening (e.g. medication, physical therapy)
  • If female of childbearing potential: not pregnant, as evidenced by a negative pregnancy test at Screening
  • Subject signed a valid, IRB-approved informed consent form (ICF) provided in English

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary pain complaint of vascular origin (e.g. peripheral vascular disease)
  • Require implantation of lead(s) in the cervical epidural space
  • Significant cognitive impairment at Screening that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would reasonably be expected to impair the study candidate's ability to assess pain intensity
  • Previous failed spinal cord stimulation trial or is already implanted with an active implantable device(s) (e.g. pacemaker, drug pump, implantable pulse generator)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spinal Cord Stimulation
To receive Spinal Cord Stimulation programming
To receive Spinal Cord Stimulation programming
Other: Conventional Medical Management
To receive conventional medical management
To receive conventional medical management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder Rate
Time Frame: 3 months post-activation
Proportion of subjects with 50% or greater reduction in overall pain relief
3 months post-activation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index)
Time Frame: 3-Months post activation
Change in Disability (Oswestry Disability Index). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated questionnaire of pain-related disability with total score on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability). Categories for ODI total score are 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The published minimally clinically important difference for change in ODI is 10 points.
3-Months post activation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Natalie Bloom Lyons, Boston Scientific Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A4077

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on WaveWriter

Subscribe