Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers Mixed With Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion (PROOF)

March 18, 2026 updated by: Kuros Biosurgery AG

A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Performance of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers (DBX or Grafton) Mixed With Local Autograft in Patients Undergoing One to Two-Level Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion (PLF)

This is a phase IV post-marketing study for MagnetOs Easypack Putty. MagnetOs Easypack Putty is a synthetic bone graft extender product that is routinely used by surgeons as a treatment for patients with degenerative disc disease or spinal trauma undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

In this study, MagnetOs Easypack Putty will be used according to the latest U.S. Instructions For Use, standalone in the posterolateral spine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, following a screening period of a maximum of 30 days, 60 patients will undergo up to two-level instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) procedure. Prior to surgery, each patient will be randomized to receive MagnetOs Easypack Putty standalone on the assigned side of the spine and Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers mixed with local autograft bone on the other at the diseased levels. They will be followed up at discharge, Week 2, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12. An interim analysis will be performed once 30 patients have completed their Month 6 visit and have measurements for the endpoints available to measure effectiveness. The primary endpoint will be analyzed at Month 12.

In this study, MagnetOs Easypack Putty will be applied according to the latest Instructions for Use approved in the United States. Specifically, MagnetOs Easypack Putty will be used standalone in patients up to two-level degenerative disc disease with segmental mechanical spinal instability requiring treatment with an instrumented posterolateral spine fusion procedure. The fusion procedure (PLF) will be left to the surgeon's discretion.

Radiographs will be obtained at Screening, Discharge, Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12. CT scans will only be obtained at Month 6 and Month 12.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
        • Recruiting
        • The Regents of the University of California- Irvine Campus
        • Contact:
    • Michigan
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63130
        • Recruiting
        • The Washington University
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator, Mark Lambrechts, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Recruiting
        • Rothman Orthopaedic Institute
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator, Jose Canseco, MD
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37209
        • Recruiting
        • Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ryan Snowden, MD
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • Recruiting
        • University of Washington
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christoph Hofstetter, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is able to read/be read, understand, and provide written informed consent and has signed the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent.
  • Male or female patient ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients with segmental mechanical spinal instability requiring arthrodesis surgery.

Instability can be either caused by degenerative disc disease or by traumatic injury to the spinal column. Patient requiring a maximum of two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar/thoraco-lumbar fusion (T11 - S1) will be enrolled. Mechanical instability is defined by the presence of one or more of the following:

  1. instability (angulation ≥ 5 degrees or translation ≥ 3 mm on flexion/extension radiographs),
  2. decreased disc height by > 2 mm, but dependent upon the spinal level
  3. Grade II or more listhesis
  4. TLICS equal or greater than 5
  5. Unstable burst fracture

    • Failed conservative treatment (physical therapy, bed rest, medications, spinal injections, manipulations, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) for a minimum period of 3 months prior to study enrollment (if the patient undergoes elective surgery). Patients who have spinal instability (as defined above in inclusion criteria number three), caused by acute trauma requiring urgent surgical treatment are excluded from this criterion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requires > two-level fusion or expected to need secondary intervention within one year following surgery.
  • Had prior PLF fusion or attempted PLF fusion at the involved levels.
  • Had previous decompression at the involved levels.
  • Women who are or intend to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
  • To treat conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable.
  • In conditions where the surgical site may be subjected to excessive impact or stresses, including those beyond the load strength of fixation hardware (e.g. defect site stabilization is not possible).
  • In case of significant vascular impairment proximal to the graft site.
  • In case of severe metabolic or systemic bone disorders (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta, history of or active Pott's disease, stage >4 renal disease or Paget's Disease) that affect bone or wound healing.
  • In case of acute and chronic infections in the operated area (soft tissue infections; inflammation, bacterial bone diseases; osteomyelitis).
  • When intraoperative soft tissue coverage is not planned or possible.
  • Receiving treatment with medication interfering with calcium metabolism.
  • Has degenerative disc disease (DDD) related to a benign or malignant tumor.
  • Has history or presence of active malignancy.
  • Has known substance abuse, psychiatric disorder, or a condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may influence the healing or ability to comply with protocol requirements.
  • Is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition.
  • Has participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to surgery for study devices.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MagnetOs Easypack Putty

Interventions

  • Procedure: Instrumented posterolateral spine fusion
  • Device; MagnetOs Easypack Putty
MagnetOs Easypack Putty used standalone in instrumented posterolateral fusion, 5cc-15c per spine level at the randomized assigned side.
Active Comparator: Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers (DBX or Grafton) mixed with local autograft bone

Interventions

  • Procedure: Instrumented posterolateral spine fusion
  • Device: Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers mixed with local autograft bone
Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers (DBX or Grafton) mixed in a 1:1 vol% with local autologous bone graft used in instrumented posterolateral fusion, 5cc-15cc per level mixed with bone marrow aspirate/blood per spine level at the contralateral side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic Fusion by CT Scan
Time Frame: Month 12
The rate of posterolateral lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion assessed by CT-scan at Month 12. Radiographic as determined by evidence of bridging trabeculae or continuous bony connection between the superior and inferior transverse processes.
Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic Fusion by CT Scan
Time Frame: Month 6
The rate of posterolateral lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion assessed by CT-scan at Month 6. Radiographic as determined by evidence of bridging trabeculae or continuous bony connection between the superior and inferior transverse processes.
Month 6
Radiographic Fusion by Plain Radiographs
Time Frame: Month 6, Month 12
The rate of posterolateral lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion assessed by plain radiographs.
Month 6, Month 12
Success Rate
Time Frame: Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12
Number of patients with secondary surgical interventions (SSI's) such as revisions, re-operations, removals, supplemental fixations, or any other procedure that adjusts or removes part of the original implant configuration with or without replacement of the components within 12 months of surgery.
Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12
Functional Outcome by Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire
Time Frame: Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12
Functional outcome by the Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire. Patient-completed questionnaire which gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) in activities of daily living in those rehabilitating from low back pain. The lower the percentage the higher the patient's functionality. 0-20% minimal disability, 80-100% significant disability or bedridden.
Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12
Back and Leg Pain by Visual Analog Pain Scale Questionnaire
Time Frame: Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12
Change in back and leg pain using Visual Analog Pain Scale (0-100). Patient-completed questionnaire scoring pain by using 100 mm line. Zero being no pain, 100 is worst pain imaginable.
Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12
Neurologic Status by Physical Exam
Time Frame: Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12
Change in neurologic status by examination to document stable, improved, or deficits in condition. Stable or improved findings for lower extremities, specifically reflexes, muscle strength, sensory, and straight leg raise.
Screening, Week 2, Month 3, 6, and 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 Months
The number of patients with Serious Adverse Events from Screening up to Month 12 after surgery
12 Months
Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 Months
The number of patients with Adverse Events from Screening up to Month 12 after surgery.
12 Months
Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Adverse Device Effects
Time Frame: 12 Months
The number of patients with Adverse Device Effects from Screening up to Month 12 after surgery.
12 Months
Safety Endpoint - number of patients with Device Related Complications
Time Frame: 12 Months
The number of patients with any complications considered to device related with 12 months after surgery.
12 Months
Health Economic - Duration of Surgery
Time Frame: 12 Months
Duration of surgery in minutes.
12 Months
Health Economic - Duration of Hospitalization
Time Frame: 12 Months
Duration of hospital stay in days.
12 Months
Health Economic - Return to Work
Time Frame: 12 Months
Time to return to work in days.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Cesar Silva, MD, Kuros BioSciences B.V.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 2, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain

Clinical Trials on MagnetOs Easypack Putty

Subscribe