- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06415123
Study to Assess the Performance of MagnEtOs Flex Matrix Compared to Cellular Allograft
May 14, 2024 updated by: Research Source
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center Study to Assess the Performance of MagnEtOs Flex Matrix Compared to Cellular Allograft in Patients Undergoing up to Four-level Instrumented poSterolatEral Lumbar/Thoraco-lumbar Fusion (PLF)
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the performance of MagnetOs Flex Matrix in patients with leg pain and/or back pain.
Study Overview
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, multi-center study that intends to demonstrate the performance of MagnetOs Flex Matrix compared to Cellular Allograft in patients with leg pain and/or back pain requiring up to four-level instrumented PLF surgery.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
30
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48033
- Michigan Orthopaedic Surgeons
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patient with leg pain and/or back pain requiring treatment with up to four-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar/thoraco-lumbar fusion (PLF) and who meet the following inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study.
A patient is considered enrolled upon placement of the MagnetOs Flex Matrix during the surgical procedure.
If the surgeon decides intra-operatively not to utilize the MagnetOs Flex Matrix, the patient will be considered a screen failure.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is able to read/be read, understand, and provide written informed consent and has signed the IRB approved informed consent.
- Male or female patient ≥ 18 years old.
- Patients with leg pain, and/or back pain requiring up to four-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar/thoraco-lumbar fusion (T11 - S1).
- Failed conservative treatment (physical therapy, bed rest, medications, spinal injections, manipulations, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) for a minimum period of 3 months prior to study enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Requires greater than four-level fusion or expected to need secondary intervention within one year following surgery.
- Had prior PLF fusion or attempted PLF fusion at the involved levels.
- Had previous decompression at the involved levels.
- Women who are or intend to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
- To treat conditions in which general bone grafting is not advisable.
- In conditions where the surgical site may be subjected to excessive impact or stresses, including those beyond the load strength of fixation hardware (e.g., defect site stabilization is not possible).
- In case of significant vascular impairment proximal to the graft site.
- In case of severe metabolic or systemic bone disorders (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta or Paget's Disease) that affect bone or wound healing.
- In case of acute and chronic infections in the operated area (soft tissue infections; inflammation, bacterial bone diseases; osteomyelitis).
- When intraoperative soft tissue coverage is not planned or possible.
- Undergoing any procedure that allows MagnetOs to come in direct contact with the articular space.
- Receiving treatment with medication interfering with calcium metabolism.
- Has leg pain, and/or back pain related to benign or malignant tumor.
- Has history or presence of active malignancy.
- Has known substance abuse, psychiatric disorder, or a condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may influence the healing or ability to comply with protocol requirements.
- Is involved in active litigation relating to his/her spinal condition.
- Has participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to surgery for study devices
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Posterolateral side fusion
Time Frame: 12 months post surgery
|
The percentage of the posterolateral sides with bridging bone for the MagnetOs Flex Matrix and control treatments using CT-scans and determined by evidence of bridging trabeculae or continuous bony connection between superior and inferior transverse processes.
|
12 months post surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Posterolateral lumbar/thoraco-lumbar fusion
Time Frame: 6 months post surgery
|
Posterolateral lumbar/thoraco-lumbar fusion at Month 6 post-surgery assessed by CT-scans
|
6 months post surgery
|
Clinical outcome via Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
|
Standard of care patient reported Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI) will be used to evaluate patient pain.
On a scale of 0 to 6 with a score of 0 being no pain and a score of 5 being worst pain.
A low score means a better clinical outcome.
A high score means a worse clinical outcome.
|
12 months post-surgery
|
Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSI's)
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
|
Number of patients with revisions, re-operations, removals, supplemental fixations, and any other procedure that adjust or in any way remove part of the original implant configuration with or without replacement of the components within 12 months post-surgery.
A low score (numbers of revisions, reoperations, etc.) means better safety outcome.
A high score (numbers of revisions, reoperations, etc.) means a worse safety outcome.
|
12 months post-surgery
|
Clinical outcome via neck visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 months post-surgery
|
Standard of care patient reported neck visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate patient pain.
On a scale of 0 to 10 with a score of 0 being no pain and a score of 10 being worst pain.
A low score means a better clinical outcome.
A high score means a worse clinical outcome.
|
12 months post-surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 14, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
May 16, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 16, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 14, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CT-003
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc Disease | Kyphosis | Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseFrance
-
Synergy Spine SolutionsMCRARecruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Orthofix Inc.TerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Yuhan CorporationCompletedDisc Degenerative DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Spine BioPharma, IncMCRARecruitingLumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
AxioMed Spine CorporationUnknownDegenerative Disc Disease (DDD)United States, Germany
-
Synthes USA HQ, Inc.CompletedLumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseAustralia, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Synergy Spine SolutionsMCRAActive, not recruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
Clinical Trials on MagnetOs Flex Matrix
-
Kuros Biosurgery AGSimplified Clinical Data Systems, LLCNot yet recruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Spine Fusion | Leg Pain and/or Back Pain
-
Kuros Biosurgery AGKuros BioSciences B.V.; Simplified Clinical Data Systems, LLCNot yet recruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Spine FusionUnited States
-
Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationWashington University School of Medicine; Pines Surgical; Meridian Healthcare...CompletedHernia of Abdominal WallUnited States
-
Kuros Biosurgery AGFactory CRO; Kuros BioSciences B.V.; The London ClinicWithdrawnDegenerative Disc DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Kuros Biosurgery AGSimplified Clinical Data Systems, LLC; Orthopaedic Institute of Western KentuckyCompletedDegenerative Disc Disease | Spine FusionUnited States
-
M.C. Kruyt, MD, PhDKuros BioSciences B.V.Active, not recruitingSpinal FusionNetherlands
-
Ewha Womans UniversityCompletedOsteoarthritisKorea, Republic of
-
Ewha Womans UniversityCompletedFemale | Osteoarthritis of the KneeKorea, Republic of
-
Renal Research InstituteCompletedEnd Stage Renal DiseaseUnited States
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiCompletedObstructive Sleep ApneaUnited States