Fascia Lata Allograft Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts in the Peri-Implant Mucosal Thickness Enhancement. (Fascia Lata)

December 21, 2020 updated by: Mohamed Hamdy Helal

Fascia Lata Allograft Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts in the Peri-Implant

The aim of this, randomized clinical trial is to determine the clinical efficacy of fascia lata allograft in terms of peri-implant mucosal augmentation, as compared to autologous sub epithelial connective tissue graft, clinically and histologically in human adults .

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The aim of this, randomized clinical trial is to determine the clinical efficacy of fascia lata allograft in terms of peri-implant mucosal augmentation, as compared to autologous sub epithelial connective tissue graft, clinically and histologically in human adults .

The hypothesis of the study is that a similar gain in peri implant mucosal thicknesses will be obtained in sites treated by either a sub epithelial connective tissue graft or a newly developed fascia lata allograft in clinically and histologically in human.

The objective of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy of the peri-implant mucosal thickness enhancement following either subepithelial connective tissue grafts or human Fascia Lata Allograft placed simultaneously with dental implant placement.

Sixteen sites that are indicated for peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement will be selected. Participants will be randomized to the control (simultaneous SCTGs) or test (simultaneous FLA) group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tanta, Egypt, 31773
        • Faculty of dentistry tanta university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Ability to maintain good oral hygiene as evidenced in recall visits. Aged 30 to 55 years. Stable periodontal condition and missing one single tooth (maxillary anterior teeth and premolars) with adjacent teeth present and thin mucosal phenotype (< 2mm bucco- lingual thickness).

Exclusion Criteria:

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Females who were pregnant, or attempting to become pregnant, and nursing mothers.

Acute infection in the area intended for implant placement.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Peri Implant mucosal thickness connective tissue graft
Sixteen sites that are indicated for peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement will be selected. Sixteen sites that were met the subsequent inclusion criteria were eligible to contribute in our study were classified randomly by the sealed envelope technique into two treatment groups, 8 sites in each group. Group I (Control Group): Autogenous SCTGs harvested from the palate +dental implants *. Group II (Experimental Group): FLA **+dental implants. The allocation was withheld from the surgeon (M.H.) until just before the surgical appointment. The clinical examiner (M.S.) was masked to the treatment group for the extent of the study.Three months after implantation, the sites were located, and the thickness of the mucosa will be evaluated using the customized stent. The operculectomy will be performed following the method of Flatebo et al.,22 collecting biopsy specimens of almost constant quality and evaluating clinical thickness without mucosal distortions
Experimental: Peri Implant mucosal thickness fascia lata graft
Sixteen sites that are indicated for peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement will be selected. Sixteen sites that were met the subsequent inclusion criteria were eligible to contribute in our study were classified randomly by the sealed envelope technique into two treatment groups, 8 sites in each group. Group I (Control Group): Autogenous SCTGs harvested from the palate +dental implants *. Group II (Experimental Group): FLA **+dental implants. The allocation was withheld from the surgeon (M.H.) until just before the surgical appointment. The clinical examiner (M.S.) was masked to the treatment group for the extent of the study.Three months after implantation, the sites were located, and the thickness of the mucosa will be evaluated using the customized stent. The operculectomy will be performed following the method of Flatebo et al.,22 collecting biopsy specimens of almost constant quality and evaluating clinical thickness without mucosal distortions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peri-Implant Mucosal Thickness
Time Frame: Measure changes in mucosal thickness around dental implant at base line and after 6 months.
The primary outcome of interest will be to measure changes (in mm) in horizontal PMT on the buccal aspect of the edentulous alveolar ridge from baseline (implant placement and grafting) to (4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks) of post-surgical healing.
Measure changes in mucosal thickness around dental implant at base line and after 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OMPDR-07-19-5

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implant Tissue Failure

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Enhancement around dental implant

3
Subscribe