Thalidomide in the Treatment of Chronic Radiation Proctitis With Intractable Bleeding (Thal-CRP)

Prospective, Open Clinical Trial of Thalidomide in the Treatment of Chronic Radiation Proctitis With Intractable Bleeding

Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is the main secondary toxic injury after pelvic radiotherapy. Hematochezia is the most common symptom for more than 80% of CRP patients.

Non-surgical treatment is the first choice to the treatment of CRP to avoid the occurrence of serious complications. Conventional oral medication for the treatment of bleeding CRP is very few and has little effect. At present, no oral medication has been found to significantly alleviate and control refractory bleeding of CRP. Therefore, it is an urgent problem to screen out a drug that is more effective, safe and highly compliant for the treatment of hemorrhagic CRP.

Thalidomide has anti-inflammatory, immune regulation, anti-angiogenesis and other effects. For the patients of CRP with intractable bleeding, a prospective, open clinical trial will be carried out to observe the safety and effectiveness of thalidomide in treating hemorrhagic CRP.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Radiotherapy is an essential therapeutic tool for pelvic malignancies such as uterine cervix, uterine corpus, prostate, testicular, urinary bladder and rectal cancers. According to reports, the estimated number of new cases of malignant pelvic tumors in China in 2015 alone exceeded 500,000. Chronic radiation proctitis (CRP) is an unavoidable and commonly observed side effect, occurs 3 months later and in 5-20% of patients after pelvic malignancy radiation. Hematochezia is the most common symptom for more than 80% of CRP patients, which is a persistent, irreversible and progressive symptom, and will probably give rise to anemia. In clinic, the treatment for intractable bleeding of CRP is very difficult.

Non-surgical treatment is the first choice to the treatment of CRP to avoid the occurrence of serious complications. Conventional oral medication for the treatment of bleeding CRP is very few and has little effect. At present, no oral medication has been found to significantly alleviate and control refractory bleeding of CRP. Therefore, it is an urgent problem to screen out a drug that is more effective, safe and highly compliant for the treatment of hemorrhagic CRP.

Thalidomide has anti-inflammatory, immune regulation, anti-angiogenesis and other effects. A large number of studies have shown that thalidomide can be used to treat Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, radiation cystitis, etc., and it can treat moderate to severe of IBD patients can inhibit inflammatory response, improve clinical symptoms, promote intestinal mucosal repair. Further, recent studies have proved that thalidomide can be used to treat intestinal bleeding due to vascular dysplasia. And a case report from Gut described that refractory bleeding of CRP of a 78-year-old woman were significantly alleviated after taking thalidomide.

Therefore, for the patients of CRP with intractable bleeding, a prospective, open clinical trial planed to carry out to observe the safety and effectiveness of thalidomide in treating hemorrhagic CRP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

62

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged 18-75 years;
  2. Patients with ECOG physical condition score of 0-2;
  3. Patients with previous pathological diagnosis of pelvic tumors (Gynecology, prostate, urinary system);
  4. Patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy, at least 6 months from the end of the last radiotherapy;
  5. Patients with no primary tumor recurrence or metastasis;
  6. Patients with refractory hemorrhagic CRP who have failed to conventional treatment (SOMA score for hematochezia≥2, hemoglobin level ≤90g/L, or a history of blood transfusion due to CRP)
  7. Subjects and their family members can understand the research plan, and are willing to participate, and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with active bleeding requiring emergency treatment;
  2. Patients with severe complications of CRP, such as Rectal ulcer (VRS>Grade 3) or fistula, perforation, stenosis, necrosis, perianal intractable pain and so on
  3. Patients with a history of rectal resection;
  4. Other bleeding diseases, such as grade III or IV hemorrhoids, coagulation dysfunction, etc.;
  5. Patients with other diseases requiring long-term use of anticoagulant drugs;
  6. Combined intestinal obstruction, requiring surgery;
  7. The absolute value of neutrophils of patients is lower than 750/mm3;
  8. Patients who are allergic to thalidomide;
  9. Pregnant or lactating women;
  10. Patients with severe mental illness;
  11. Patients who cannot take medication or follow up as planned;
  12. During the trial and within 3 months after the trial, the subjects and their partners are not willing to contraception;
  13. Participants in other clinical investigators 3 months before the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Thalidomide treatment Group

Induction period:

Thalidomide tablets: 50-100 mg/d, qn, po.

Maintenance period:

Thalidomide tablets: 50-75 mg/d qn, po.

The patients were treated with thalidomide tanken orally every night for 4 months, and the treatment period was divided into induction period and maintenance period, as follows:

Induction period:

The oral dose of thalidomide started at 50 mg, and increased to 100 mg after one week if tolerable, and maintain 100 mg for three weeks. The medication time was 1 month.

Maintenance period: The oral dose of thalidomide was 50-75mg/d. The medication time was 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remission rate of rectal bleeding one month after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the first month after thalidomide treatment
Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious.
the first month after thalidomide treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remission rate of rectal bleeding one month during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the first month during thalidomide treatment
Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious.
the first month during thalidomide treatment
Remission rate of rectal bleeding two months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the second month during thalidomide treatment
Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious.
the second month during thalidomide treatment
Remission rate of rectal bleeding three months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the third month during thalidomide treatment
Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious.
the third month during thalidomide treatment
Remission rate of rectal bleeding four months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious.
the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Remission rate of rectal bleeding three months after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the third month after thalidomide treatment
Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious.
the third month after thalidomide treatment
Remission rate of rectal bleeding six months after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the sixth month after thalidomide treatment
Remission of rectal bleeding was defined as the score of Subjective Objective Management Analysis system (SOMA) for retcal bleeding at least 1 grade lower and the hemoglobin level at least 10g/L higher than that before treatment. The SOMA score for hematochezia was ranged from 1 to 4, with the higher the score, the more serious.
the sixth month after thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score one month during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the first month during thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion.
the first month during thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score four months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion.
the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score one month after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the first month after thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion.
the first month after thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score three months after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the third month after thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion.
the third month after thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score six months after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the sixth month after thalidomide treatment
Endoscopic score was performed using Vienna rectoscopy Score (VRS). VRS was ranged 1 to 5. A higher score indicated a more severe lesion.
the sixth month after thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient one month during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the first month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflect the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life.
the first month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient two months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the second month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life.
the second month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient three months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the third month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life.
the third month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient four months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life.
the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient one month after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the first month after thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life.
the first month after thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient three months after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the third month after thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life.
the third month after thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient six months after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the sixth month after thalidomide treatment
Quality of life of the patient was evaluated by the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire composed of multi-item scales and single items that reflecting the multidimensionality of the quality-of-life. It incorporated five functioning subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), nine symptom subscales (pain, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, insomnia, financial difficulties), and one global quality of life subscale, and the scores were ranged 0 to 100. Higher scores for functional subscales and global quality of life subscale indicated the better functional status and quality of life. But the higher scores for symptom subscales indicated the poorer quality of life.
the sixth month after thalidomide treatment
Incidence of adverse events four months during thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Including adverse reactions of thalidomide and other adverse events
the fourth month during thalidomide treatment
Incidence of adverse events six months after thalidomide treatment
Time Frame: the sixth month after thalidomide treatment
Including adverse reactions of thalidomide and other adverse events
the sixth month after thalidomide treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Radiation Proctitis

Clinical Trials on Thalidomide

Subscribe