Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women (IMPACTGP)

February 2, 2023 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women Combined With Sending Their General Practitioners a List of Their Nonadherent Patients

Context:

In France, cervical cancer (CC) screening was opportunistic until recently. The target population includes women aged 25 to 65 years. About 66% of women aged 25-40 years have performed a screening test over the last three years but this figure decreases to 55% in women over 40. The third "Cancer Plan" proposed by the French National Institute for Cancer recommends to achieve an 80% participation in eligible women.

Improving women compliance to CC screening is a major challenge to decrease cancer incidence and mortality.

To improve patient adherence, a CC screening organization will be launched in 2020 at a national scale in France. Women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation letter from the local public health association in charge of cancer screening organization. The invitation letter will remind women that they should consult a healthcare professional (a general practitioner (GP), a gynecologist or a midwife) to perform a screening test.

Providing GPs with a list of their non-adherent patients could also improve women compliance to CC screening recommendations.

The study objective is to assess whether sending both an invitation letter to non-adherent women and a list of their non-adherent patients to GPs ("invitation letter + GP reminder" group) could increase the proportion of women who perform a screening test, compared to only sending an invitation letter to non-adherent women ("invitation letter" group) or not sending any invitation ("usual care" group).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Design, Setting and Participants:

The investigators will conduct a 3-arm, cluster-randomized, controlled trial in the Loire-Atlantique region, in France.

The study will include a total of 1,500 GPs and about 100,000 women. The randomization will be based on GP practices to avoid a contamination bias resulting from shared tracking mechanisms and communication between GPs within a given practice. Thus, several GPs working in the same practice will be assigned to the same study arm. Women on the patient list of a given GP will be assigned to the arm of this GP.

Intervention:

After a cluster randomization according to the practice, the GPs and their female patients will be included in one of the following 3 arms:

  • "Invitation letter + GP reminder" (Arm 1): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test, AND GPs will receive the list of their 40-65 year-old patients who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years;
  • "Invitation letter" (Arm 2): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients.
  • "Usual care" (arm 3): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will NOT receive any invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients.

Expected Results

The investigators expect an increase in the proportion of women who perform a screening test in the intervention arm (arm 1), compared to arms 2 and 3. Previous studies have suggested that the proportion of women adherent to CC screening could be increased by 25% in arm 1 compared to arm 3, whereas the participation could be increased by 15% in arm 2 compared to arm 3.

Considering that the proportion of adherent women in arm 3 should be of about 55%, the absolute increase in participation could reach 11% in arm 1, and 6.6% in arm 2.

A higher adherence to CC screening could improve the detection of pathological lesions by 5% for pathological pap smears and by 10% for positive HPV tests.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

195000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria for GPs:

- All GPs practicing in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France) will be included.

Inclusion criteria for patients :

  • women aged 40 to 65 years,
  • being on the patient list of the GPs participating in the study,
  • living in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France),
  • being affiliated to the National Health Insurance.

Exclusion Criteria for GPs:

- GPs who could refuse to participate by contacting the research team.

Inclusion criteria for patients :

  • Refusal to participate to the study
  • Female patients who underwent total hysterectomy and those who received a pathological result of a previous pap smear (asc-us or CIN) are not eligible to participate in the CC screening and therefore excluded from the study.
  • Women not registered with a GP located in Loire-Atlantique will not be included.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Invitation letter + GP reminder (Arm 1)
40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test, AND GPs will receive the list of their 40-65 year-old patients who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Invitation letter (Arm 2)
40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients.
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual care (Arm 3)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of women aged 40-65 who performed a screening test (HPV test or PAP smear) over the last 3 years, 6 months after the intervention
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of cytological tests performed among all screening tests
6 months
Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of HPV tests performed among all screening tests
6 months
Description of the results of screening tests carried out in first intention
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of abnormal test results (cytology, HPV) among all screening tests performed
6 months
Description of the types of tests performed for follow-up of lesions detected
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of "reflex" tests performed (number of cervical smears after a positive HPV result) among abnormal test results
6 months
Description of the types of tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of biopsies and conizations performed among abnormal screening test results
12 months
Description the results of the tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of high-grade lesions detected (second, a third-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, including in situ carcinomas and cancers) among the abnormal screening tests
12 months
Description of the treatments undergone by the women following abnormal screening tests
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentages of treatments performed (conization, laser, hysterectomy) among the abnormal screening tests
12 months
Description of the factors associated with lower participation in screening
Time Frame: 6 months
Participation rate according to age (over 50), income (women with low incomes qualifying for basic health coverage) and comorbidities.
6 months
Description of the healthcare trajectory of women undergoing a screening test
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of women who resort to a GP, a midwife or a gynaecologist to undergo their screening test
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cedric RAT, Professor, Nantes University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Anne-Sophie BANASZUK, Doctor, Centre de coordination des dépistages des cancers (CRCDC)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 2, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on Invitation letter + GP reminder

Subscribe