- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04689178
Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women (IMPACTGP)
Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women Combined With Sending Their General Practitioners a List of Their Nonadherent Patients
Context:
In France, cervical cancer (CC) screening was opportunistic until recently. The target population includes women aged 25 to 65 years. About 66% of women aged 25-40 years have performed a screening test over the last three years but this figure decreases to 55% in women over 40. The third "Cancer Plan" proposed by the French National Institute for Cancer recommends to achieve an 80% participation in eligible women.
Improving women compliance to CC screening is a major challenge to decrease cancer incidence and mortality.
To improve patient adherence, a CC screening organization will be launched in 2020 at a national scale in France. Women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation letter from the local public health association in charge of cancer screening organization. The invitation letter will remind women that they should consult a healthcare professional (a general practitioner (GP), a gynecologist or a midwife) to perform a screening test.
Providing GPs with a list of their non-adherent patients could also improve women compliance to CC screening recommendations.
The study objective is to assess whether sending both an invitation letter to non-adherent women and a list of their non-adherent patients to GPs ("invitation letter + GP reminder" group) could increase the proportion of women who perform a screening test, compared to only sending an invitation letter to non-adherent women ("invitation letter" group) or not sending any invitation ("usual care" group).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Design, Setting and Participants:
The investigators will conduct a 3-arm, cluster-randomized, controlled trial in the Loire-Atlantique region, in France.
The study will include a total of 1,500 GPs and about 100,000 women. The randomization will be based on GP practices to avoid a contamination bias resulting from shared tracking mechanisms and communication between GPs within a given practice. Thus, several GPs working in the same practice will be assigned to the same study arm. Women on the patient list of a given GP will be assigned to the arm of this GP.
Intervention:
After a cluster randomization according to the practice, the GPs and their female patients will be included in one of the following 3 arms:
- "Invitation letter + GP reminder" (Arm 1): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test, AND GPs will receive the list of their 40-65 year-old patients who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years;
- "Invitation letter" (Arm 2): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients.
- "Usual care" (arm 3): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will NOT receive any invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients.
Expected Results
The investigators expect an increase in the proportion of women who perform a screening test in the intervention arm (arm 1), compared to arms 2 and 3. Previous studies have suggested that the proportion of women adherent to CC screening could be increased by 25% in arm 1 compared to arm 3, whereas the participation could be increased by 15% in arm 2 compared to arm 3.
Considering that the proportion of adherent women in arm 3 should be of about 55%, the absolute increase in participation could reach 11% in arm 1, and 6.6% in arm 2.
A higher adherence to CC screening could improve the detection of pathological lesions by 5% for pathological pap smears and by 10% for positive HPV tests.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nantes, France, 44000
- University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria for GPs:
- All GPs practicing in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France) will be included.
Inclusion criteria for patients :
- women aged 40 to 65 years,
- being on the patient list of the GPs participating in the study,
- living in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France),
- being affiliated to the National Health Insurance.
Exclusion Criteria for GPs:
- GPs who could refuse to participate by contacting the research team.
Inclusion criteria for patients :
- Refusal to participate to the study
- Female patients who underwent total hysterectomy and those who received a pathological result of a previous pap smear (asc-us or CIN) are not eligible to participate in the CC screening and therefore excluded from the study.
- Women not registered with a GP located in Loire-Atlantique will not be included.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SCREENING
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Invitation letter + GP reminder (Arm 1)
|
40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test, AND GPs will receive the list of their 40-65 year-old patients who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Invitation letter (Arm 2)
|
40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test.
GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients.
|
|
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual care (Arm 3)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Proportion of women aged 40-65 who performed a screening test (HPV test or PAP smear) over the last 3 years, 6 months after the intervention
Time Frame: 6 months
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of cytological tests performed among all screening tests
|
6 months
|
|
Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of HPV tests performed among all screening tests
|
6 months
|
|
Description of the results of screening tests carried out in first intention
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of abnormal test results (cytology, HPV) among all screening tests performed
|
6 months
|
|
Description of the types of tests performed for follow-up of lesions detected
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of "reflex" tests performed (number of cervical smears after a positive HPV result) among abnormal test results
|
6 months
|
|
Description of the types of tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of biopsies and conizations performed among abnormal screening test results
|
12 months
|
|
Description the results of the tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of high-grade lesions detected (second, a third-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, including in situ carcinomas and cancers) among the abnormal screening tests
|
12 months
|
|
Description of the treatments undergone by the women following abnormal screening tests
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Percentages of treatments performed (conization, laser, hysterectomy) among the abnormal screening tests
|
12 months
|
|
Description of the factors associated with lower participation in screening
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Participation rate according to age (over 50), income (women with low incomes qualifying for basic health coverage) and comorbidities.
|
6 months
|
|
Description of the healthcare trajectory of women undergoing a screening test
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of women who resort to a GP, a midwife or a gynaecologist to undergo their screening test
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cedric RAT, Professor, Nantes University Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Anne-Sophie BANASZUK, Doctor, Centre de coordination des dépistages des cancers (CRCDC)
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RC20_0364
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.