Aftercare Focus Study (AFS): A Clinical Trial to Reduce Short-Term Suicide Risk After Hospitalization

December 31, 2020 updated by: Kate Comtois, University of Washington
Increasingly, the period after hospital admission is acknowledged as one of extremely high risk for suicidal patients. While it might be hoped that hospitalization would address and resolve suicide risk, a review of international studies shows the risk of suicide is up to 200 times higher among individuals recently discharged from hospitals vs. the general population. In response, some health care systems use an "urgent care" or "next-day appointment" (NDA) clinics for follow-up. NDAs serve as short-term crisis intervention at a specific appointment time and location so patients do not "fall through the cracks" in the care transition. Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) is a potentially effective intervention to reduce short term suicidal risk in this transition from inpatient to outpatient treatment. To this end, this study has the following study aims: (1) Evaluate whether CAMS for suicidal NDA patients results in less suicidal behavior than TAU, (2) Evaluate whether CAMS for suicidal NDA patients results in less suicidal ideation and intent as well as improved mental health markers than TAU, and (3) Evaluate whether CAMS for suicidal NDA patients is more satisfactory to patients than TAU.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Increasingly, the period after hospital admission is acknowledged as one of extremely high risk for suicidal patients. While it might be hoped that hospitalization would address and resolve suicide risk, a review of international studies shows the risk of suicide is up to 200 times higher among individuals recently discharged from hospitals vs. the general population. In response, some health care systems use an "urgent care" or "next-day appointment" (NDA) clinics for follow-up. NDAs serve as short-term crisis intervention at a specific appointment time and location so patients do not "fall through the cracks" in the care transition. Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) is a promising outpatient treatment framework that merits rigorous study as a potentially effective intervention to reduce short term suicidal risk in the transition from inpatient to outpatient treatment. Pilot data suggest that CAMS decreases suicidal ideation and psychological distress while increasing hope, patient satisfaction, and retention more than NDA treatment as usual (TAU). CAMS in the NDA clinic has the potential to fill three key targets highlighted in the 2012 National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: (1) prevent suicidal behavior, (2) increase clinician confidence and willingness to see suicidal patients, and (3) are sufficiently feasible, trainable, adaptable, and flexible to scale up across health systems. To this end, this study has the following study aims: (1) Evaluate whether CAMS for suicidal NDA patients results in less suicidal behavior than TAU, (2) Evaluate whether CAMS for suicidal NDA patients results in less suicidal ideation and intent as well as improved mental health markers than TAU, and (3) Evaluate whether CAMS for suicidal NDA patients is more satisfactory to patients than TAU.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. inpatient or emergency service admission for suicidality or suicide attempt
  2. lifetime suicide attempt
  3. referring clinician determined that the patient did not have appropriate outpatient mental health appointment in the next two weeks (other than an NDA)
  4. an NDA is an appropriate disposition plan
  5. consented to all study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. under age 18
  2. insufficient English to understand the study procedures and provide informed consent
  3. too psychotic or manic, aggressive, or cognitively impaired such that outpatient therapy was not indicated
  4. patient not stable enough to be discharged home for a minimum of 24 hours prior to study treatment
  5. court-ordered to outpatient treatment
  6. patient lived an impractical distance away

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Community Mental Health Center Next Day Appointment clinic
Treatment as Usual was based on the staff, policies, and procedures of the community mental health center Next Day Appointment clinic (CMHC) affiliated with our university. Research therapists and the research psychiatrist were hired from the CMHC staff who followed standard CMHC policies and procedures.
Experimental: Experimental
Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS)
CAMS is a suicide-focused intervention that stabilizes the suicidal patient and identifies, targets, and treats patient-defined "suicidal drivers"-the problems (e.g., trauma, financial issues, relationship loss) that compel a patient to consider suicide. CAMS is theoretically agnostic, patient-centered, and can be used across different suicidal populations and clinical settings.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicidal behavior
Time Frame: Twelve months
Suicidal behavior will be a count of a suicide + all suicide attempts + all acute hospitalizations to prevent suicide. Suicide will be determined by death records; Suicide attempts measured with the Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Count; Hospitalizations measured with the Treatment History Interview-Short Form
Twelve months
Suicidal ideation
Time Frame: Twelve months
Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS) (19 item scale scored 0-2 so scores range from 0-38 with higher scores indicating worse ideation)
Twelve months
Suicidal intent
Time Frame: Twelve months
Beck Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) (17 item scale scored 0-2 so scores range from 0-34 with higher scores indicating stronger suicide intent)
Twelve months
Psychological Distress
Time Frame: Twelve months
Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 (45 item scale scored 0-4 with three subscales (symptom distress, interpersonal problems, and social role functioning) and a total score ranging from 0-180 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes)
Twelve months
Quality of life and overall functioning
Time Frame: Twelve months
EQ-5D (5 items scored using an algorithm to create an index value anchored at 1=full health and 0=dead)(Note the measure of this construct was changed from proposed Lehman Quality of Life Interview prior to study recruitment to reduce subject burden)
Twelve months
Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: Through the end of study treatment, an average of 3 months
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (8 item scale scored 1-4 resulting in a score ranging from 1-32 with higher indicating greater satisfaction with treatment)
Through the end of study treatment, an average of 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katherine A Comtois, PhD, MPH, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual

Subscribe