Erb:Yag Laser Versus Pelvic Floor Training for the Treatment of Women With Mild to Moderate Stress Urinary Incontinence (EFFECT)

January 11, 2021 updated by: Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Erbium:Yag Laser Versus Pelvic Floor Training for the Treatment of Women With Mild to Moderate Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a pilot study to assess the feasibility and safety to run a randomized controlled trial that compared the effectivity of erbium:yag vaginal laser versus pelvic floor training in women with mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This pilot study attempts to demonstrated the feasibility and security to run a randomized controlled study that compared the effectivity of erbium:yag laser used vaginally versus pelvic floor training, coached by a physiotherapist expert in pelvic floor disorders.

Patients are going to be randomized to pelvic floor exercises (10 sessions) or erbium:yag laser (2 sessions), and assess the results at 6 and 12 moths later on.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santiago, Chile
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinico de La Florida
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Victor Miranda, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sebastian Viguera, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sarita Donoso
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gloria Alonso

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild to Moderated Stress Urinary Incontinence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mixed Urinary incontinence
  • Pelvic organ prolase greater than stage 2
  • Previous surgery for stress urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse
  • Severe Stress urinary incontinence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erbium:Yag Laser
Patients allocated to the erbium:yag laser are going to undergo 2 sessions of vaginal laser, separated by one month each other.
Subjets in the laser arm will undergo 2 sessions of vaginal erbium-yag laser, separated by a month
Active Comparator: Pelvic floor training
Patients allocated to pelvic floor training, are goin to undergo 10 sessions of pelvic floor exercises coached by an expert physiotherapist.
Patients allocated to pelvic floor training, are goin to undergo 10 sessions of pelvic floor exercises coached by an expert physiotherapist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: The questionnaire will be applied at baseline, 6 month and 1 year
In order to measure quality of life, we are going to use the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICQI-SF), validate to spanish and in Chile. A higher score in this scale means a worse outcome for the patient.
The questionnaire will be applied at baseline, 6 month and 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pad test
Time Frame: at baseline, 6 month and 1 year
A 24 h Pad test will be applied. The pad will be weighted after 24 h of use and the difference between the dry pad and the wet pad is going to be recorded. A great difference means a worse outcome for the patient.
at baseline, 6 month and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 21, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Erbium Yag Laser

Subscribe