Use of Non-ablative Vaginal Erbium YAG Laser for the Treatment of Prolapse (VELPOP)

May 22, 2023 updated by: prof. dr. Jan Deprest, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Use of Non-ablative Vaginal Erbium YAG Laser for the Treatment of Prolapse: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

This is a single center, investigator initiated study, sponsored by the UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; comparing laser treatment to pelvic floor exercises (PFE).

Women with symptomatic prolapse (grade II-IV) who seek for a conservative treatment, with no history of previous POP-surgery will be randomised to either the laser-arm or the PFE-arm.

There are 3 visits where vaginal application of laser will be performed, with a 4-weeks interval. Each application lasts around 15 minutes. The vaginal laser procedure will be performed in an outpatient setting, not requiring any specific preparation, analgesia or anesthesia, by one of two experienced operators.

The primary objective is to evaluate the effects of VEL treatment for reduction of prolapse symptoms and as a secondary outcome objective measurements. These endpoints are in line with the recommendations by Durnea et al., as being the most relevant and patient centered outcomes.

The second goals are to register adverse events and to determine for how long the effects of laser are sustained, with a maximum of two years. To do so, the investigators will measure long term satisfaction with, and the longevity of the effect (measured by the need for repeat or alternative therapy) of laser therapy.

Duration of follow-up per patient: max 27 months

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of POP symptoms
  • Diagnosis of cystocele or rectocele of grade II to IV according to the POP-Q system, leading the prolapse (i.e. C ≤ Ba/Bp)
  • Voluntary informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms or anatomical evidence for intussusception / rectal prolapse
  • Leading descent of the middle compartment (C > Ba/Bp)
  • Grade IV prolapse
  • Previous POP surgery
  • Pregnancy or <12 months postpartum
  • Vaginal bleeding, injuries or infection in the treated area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser

There are 3 visits where vaginal application of laser will be performed, with a 4-weeks interval. If needed, 3 extra laser applications can be added to the treatment (ie. with a maximum of 6 applications). Each application lasts around 15 minutes. The vaginal laser procedure will be performed in an outpatient setting, not requiring any specific preparation, analgesia or anesthesia, by one of two experienced operators.

Laser therapy is performed using a 2940 nm VEL (SP Spectro, Fotona, Slovenia(24)) with SMOOTH mode setting, which enables non-ablative, thermal-only operation(25). The parameters are selected based on extensive preclinical and clinical studies(26,27,28).

Each laser treatment session consists of a full vaginal canal irradiation (using a 360° circular adapter), followed by additional irradiation of the prolapsed anterior wall (using a 90° angular adaptor) and concluded with irradiation of the vestibule area.

Active Comparator: PFE
Standard PFE in Belgium are 9 sessions with a pelvic floor physiotherapist of choice, which can be extended by another 9 sessions, if clinically indicated. There are different strategies, though that will be on discretion of the physiotherapist. We will register the type of physiotherapy (standard (PFMT) versus assisted pelvic floor muscles training (APFMT)), number of completed sessions and duration of therapy. What is exactly done by the patient is registered as a variable.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome is the subjective improvement of POP symptoms, assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6 (POPDI-6).
Time Frame: 6 months after last treatment
Participants have to answer 6 questions concerning POP symptoms with a response scale from 0 to 4 (not present (=0), not at all (=1), somewhat (=2), moderately (=3), quite a bit (=4)). The score (range 0 to 100) is then obtained by multiplying the mean value of all of the answered items by 25. Missing items are dealt with by using the mean from answered items only. Higher scores indicate more distress. This questionnaire is available and validated in English, Dutch and French. Success is defined as a reduction in scores of at least 25% compared with baseline.
6 months after last treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the anatomical success rate by means of the POP-Q system
Time Frame: At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Anatomical success is defined as POP-Q = grade 0 (no prolapse) or grade I (leading edge < -1cm)
At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the rate of patient satisfaction by means of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI)
Time Frame: At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
a 5-point Likert scale (1=much worse, 2=worse, 3=same, 4=better, 5=much better)
At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the degree of discomfort of the treatment procedure by the patient
Time Frame: At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
VAS-score (Visual Analogue Scale: 0-10cm, continuous scale); the higher the score, the higher the discomfort
At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of the longevity of the effect of laser therapy
Time Frame: At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12), end of treatment (ie. 4 months after randomisation), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Measured by the need for repeating the same, or initiating an alternative therapy
At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12), end of treatment (ie. 4 months after randomisation), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of sexual function, by means of the Pelvic Organ prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire IUGA revised (PISQ-IR)
Time Frame: At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
The PISQ-IR is a questionnaire with twenty questions. Q1 is a question to divide the patients based on sexual activity. Not sexually active (NSA) women are referred to Q2-Q6. Sexually active (SA) women are asked to fill out Q7-Q20. The questionnaire for NSA women consists of five questions or 12 items. A higher score refers to a higher impact of PFD on sexual functioning. The questionnaire for SA women consists of 14 questions wherein women with a partner have to fill out all 14, being 22 items. Women without partner can skip questions 13 and 14, filling out 19 items. A lower score refers to a lower impact of PFD on sexual functioning. This questionnaire is available and validated in English, Dutch and French.
At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Assessment of urinary symptoms by means of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
Time Frame: At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
The final UDI-6 score is calculated by adding all scores as explained in the above, and dividing the result to 6 to obtain a mean value which is in turn multiplied by 25 to obtain the scale score. The score varies from 0 to 100. The basic interpretation of the score is that the higher the score, the higher the disability. This questionnaire is available and validated in English, Dutch and French.
At every visit (ie. week 4, 8 and 12, optional: 16, 20 and 24 weeks), 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S64093

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Non-ablative vaginal Erbium YAG laser treatment

3
Subscribe