Topical Cyclosporine A for the Treatment of Dry Eye: A Randomized Clinical Study

January 15, 2021 updated by: Alexandria University
Since the initial description, the therapeutic efficacy of CsA for human KCS has been well documented, with evidence ranging from several small single center randomized double-masked clinical trials to several large multicenter randomized, double-masked clinical trials.(10-12) Therefore, the aim of the work is to evaluate the effect of using topical CsA in treatment of moderate to severe dry eye.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Dry eye disease (DED) is known to be among the most frequently occuring ocular morbidities. It is a growing public health concern affecting 25% of patients who visit ophthalmic clinics.For many years, DED was considered to be limited to dryness of the eyes due to decrease in the aqueous phase in the tear film. In 2007, the International Dry Eye Workshop discussed the definition and classification of DED and developed a new vision for the definition and the three-part classification of DED on the basis of etiology, mechanism, and severity of DED. Moreover, DED can be episodic or chronic. Episodic DED occurs when environmental or visual tasks with reduced blinking overwhelm the stability of the tear and produce symptomatic DED. Chronic DED, although aggravated by the same environmental conditions, persists continuously with symptoms and possible damage to the ocular surface. Because the tear film in DED patients is not stable and incapable to maintain the protective qualities that are important for its structure and function, patients usually experience the discomfort manifestations associated with DED such as burning, stinging, foreign body sensation, ocular fatigue, grittiness, tearing, and dryness. Patients may complain of symptoms of DED in the presence or absence of the known signs and DED may be diagnosed based only on the signs observed by a healthcare professional in the absence of symptoms reported by the patients.Since the initial description, the therapeutic efficacy of CsA for human KCS has been well documented, with evidence ranging from several small single center randomized double-masked clinical trials to several large multicenter randomized, double-masked clinical trials.Therefore, the aim of the work is to evaluate the effect of using topical CsA in treatment of moderate to severe dry eye.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We included all patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease (grade 3 or grade 4) with the following criteria: The tear film break up time ≤5 seconds for grade 3 and immediate for grade 4, schirmer test with anesthetic is ≤5 millimeters for grade 3 and ≤2 millimeters for grade 4, corneal or conjunctival staining pattern with fluorescein is abnormal and consistent with an abnormal tear film. Oxford grade II or more, meibomian gland dysfunction is documented (inspissation of the meibomian gland orifices, pitting and neovascularization of the eyelid margins) and one or more moderate (≥2+) dry eye related symptoms; including itching, burning, blurred vision, foreign body sensation, photophobia, veiling, and soreness or pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included Post LASIK patients, Post radiation fibrosis of lacrimal gland, Vitamin A deficiency, Conjunctival scarring (advanced trachoma, chemical burn, OCP), Drugs (anti-histaminics, anti-cholinergic, anti-psychotics, selective serotonin uptake inhibitors), Patients with familial dysautonomia (Riley-Day syndrome), Use of systemic or topical CsA in the previous 90 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
Placebo group
Placebo
Experimental: Topical CsA
Group A received topical CsA 0.05% for 3 months
In our study we used 0.05% CsA prepared in castor oil by transferring (20ml ) of sterile castor oil in a sterile glass vial under laminar flow, removing a volume (400ul)of oil with micropipette (sterile tips), and replacing this volume with an equal volume of alcoholic CsA solution [200mg cyclosporine in 8 ml ethanol (96%)] under laminar flow.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tear Break up Time
Time Frame: 3 months
Measuring the time lapse between last blink after instillation of fluorescein and appearance of the first dry spot on the corneal surface
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Schirmer test
Time Frame: 3 months
It was performed by placing a thin strip of filter paper in the inferior cul-de-sac following the instillation of topical anesthetic; then, the eyes are closed for 5 minutes, and the amount of wetting of the paper strip is measured. Measurement of less than 5mm is abnormal; 5-10 mm is equivocal.
3 months
Intra ocular pressure
Time Frame: 3 months
Intra ocular pressure measurement by applanation tonometery
3 months
Fluorescein staining (Oxford Grading Scale)
Time Frame: 3 months
graded on a scale from 0 = none to 5 = severe by Oxford grading system
3 months
OSDI Scores
Time Frame: 3 months
The OSDI is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the severity of dry eye disease. Subjects in the study completed the OSDI Questionnaire each visit.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe