Combined Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) With Fractional Erbium:YAG Laser Ablation in Scar Prevention

January 22, 2021 updated by: Bo Young Chung, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Efficacy of Combined Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) With Fractional Erbium:YAG Laser Ablation in Scar Prevention

The scar site was divided into 3 sites; combined IPL/fractional Er:YAG laser treatment site, fractional Er:YAG laser treatment site and untreated control site. At baseline, three lesions were randomized to IPL / fractional Er:YAG laser combination therapy site, fractional Er:YAG laser treatment alone site, and untreated control site. The laser treatment was conducted total three sessions, immediately at suture removal (baseline), 4 weeks after suture removal and 8 weeks after suture removal. The evaluation of scar site was conducted 3 months later after last treatment (20 weeks after suture removal).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07441
        • Recruiting
        • KangNam Sacred Heart Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of postoperative scars on the abdomen
  • scars were symmetrical shaped in a line of 3cm or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled systemic or chronic disease
  • hypersensitive to the ingredients
  • a history of other laser treatments within the past 6 months
  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • Recent sun exposure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: combined IPL/fractional Er:YAG laser treatment site

At baseline, three lesions were randomized to IPL / fractional Er:YAG laser combination therapy site.

Topical anesthetic cream was applied to the scar 30 minutes before laser treatment. The same dermatologist performed all laser treatments including IPL and 2,940 nm Er:YAG fractional laser. The face was cooled after treatment with gauze soaked in ice water.

The laser treatment was conducted total three sessions, immediately at suture removal, 4 weeks after suture removal and 8 weeks after suture removal. The evaluation of scar site was conducted 3 months later after last treatment.

At baseline, three lesions were randomized. Topical anesthetic cream was applied to the scar 30 minutes before laser treatment.

The same dermatologist performed 2,940 nm Er:YAG fractional laser. (long pulse mode, 1500mJ, 2Hz, 2 pass) The face was cooled after treatment with gauze soaked in ice water. The laser treatment was conducted total three sessions, immediately at suture removal, 4 weeks after suture removal and 8 weeks after suture removal. The evaluation of scar site was conducted 3 months later after last treatment.

Other Names:
  • Matrixell, Medro corp., Seoul, Korea

At baseline, three lesions were randomized. Topical anesthetic cream was applied to the scar 30 minutes before laser treatment.

The same dermatologist performed IPL. (irridation energy: 12.5J/cm2, pulse duration: 10ms, 1pass) The face was cooled after treatment with gauze soaked in ice water. The laser treatment was conducted total three sessions, immediately at suture removal, 4 weeks after suture removal and 8 weeks after suture removal. The evaluation of scar site was conducted 3 months later after last treatment.

Other Names:
  • IPL (Ellipse Flex, DDD, Hoersholm, Denmark)
Active Comparator: fractional Er:YAG laser treatment alone site

At baseline, three lesions were randomized to fractional Er:YAG laser combination therapy site.

Topical anesthetic cream was applied to the scar 30 minutes before laser treatment. The same dermatologist performed 2,940 nm Er:YAG fractional laser. The face was cooled after treatment with gauze soaked in ice water.

The laser treatment was conducted total three sessions, immediately at suture removal, 4 weeks after suture removal and 8 weeks after suture removal. The evaluation of scar site was conducted 3 months later after last treatment.

At baseline, three lesions were randomized. Topical anesthetic cream was applied to the scar 30 minutes before laser treatment.

The same dermatologist performed 2,940 nm Er:YAG fractional laser. (long pulse mode, 1500mJ, 2Hz, 2 pass) The face was cooled after treatment with gauze soaked in ice water. The laser treatment was conducted total three sessions, immediately at suture removal, 4 weeks after suture removal and 8 weeks after suture removal. The evaluation of scar site was conducted 3 months later after last treatment.

Other Names:
  • Matrixell, Medro corp., Seoul, Korea
No Intervention: untreated control site
At baseline, three lesions were randomized to untreated control site. Topical anesthetic cream was applied to the scar 30 minutes before laser treatment. The evaluation of scar site was conducted 3 months later after last treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The POSAS observer consists of following 6 items: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, surface area, relief, pliability. Each item was evaluated on a scale from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar). Finally, the POSAS total score was calculated as the sum of six items, ranging from 6 to 60.
4 weeks
Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The POSAS observer consists of following 6 items: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, surface area, relief, pliability. Each item was evaluated on a scale from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar). Finally, the POSAS total score was calculated as the sum of six items, ranging from 6 to 60.
8 weeks
Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The POSAS observer consists of following 6 items: vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, surface area, relief, pliability. Each item was evaluated on a scale from 1 (normal skin) to 10 (worst scar). Finally, the POSAS total score was calculated as the sum of six items, ranging from 6 to 60.
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Vancouver Scar scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The VSS consists of 4 following components: vascularity, pigmentation, height ranging from 0 to 3, and pliability from 0 to 5. Score zero means the normal skin, while maximum scores indicate the worst scar.
4 weeks
Total Vancouver Scar scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The VSS consists of 4 following components: vascularity, pigmentation, height ranging from 0 to 3, and pliability from 0 to 5. Score zero means the normal skin, while maximum scores indicate the worst scar.
8 weeks
Total Vancouver Scar scale
Time Frame: 20 weeks
The VSS consists of 4 following components: vascularity, pigmentation, height ranging from 0 to 3, and pliability from 0 to 5. Score zero means the normal skin, while maximum scores indicate the worst scar.
20 weeks
Erythema index
Time Frame: 4 weeks

The indexes were measured by placing Spectrophotometer (Cortex Technology, Had- sund, Denmark) directly on the skin lesions for two minutes in the room with constant temperature (20~24 degree Celsius) and humidity (28~38 percent).

This measurement was performed to determine erythema.

4 weeks
Erythema index
Time Frame: 8 weeks

The indexes were measured by placing Spectrophotometer (Cortex Technology, Had- sund, Denmark) directly on the skin lesions for two minutes in the room with constant temperature (20~24 degree Celsius) and humidity (28~38 percent).

This measurement was performed to determine erythema.

8 weeks
Erythema index
Time Frame: 20 weeks

The indexes were measured by placing Spectrophotometer (Cortex Technology, Had- sund, Denmark) directly on the skin lesions for two minutes in the room with constant temperature (20~24 degree Celsius) and humidity (28~38 percent).

This measurement was performed to determine erythema.

20 weeks
Melanin index
Time Frame: 4 weeks

The indexes were measured by placing Spectrophotometer (Cortex Technology, Had- sund, Denmark) directly on the skin lesions for two minutes in the room with constant temperature (20~24 degree Celsius) and humidity (28~38 percent).

This measurement was performed to determine pigmentation.

4 weeks
Melanin index
Time Frame: 8 weeks

The indexes were measured by placing Spectrophotometer (Cortex Technology, Had- sund, Denmark) directly on the skin lesions for two minutes in the room with constant temperature (20~24 degree Celsius) and humidity (28~38 percent).

This measurement was performed to determine pigmentation.

8 weeks
Melanin index
Time Frame: 20 weeks

The indexes were measured by placing Spectrophotometer (Cortex Technology, Had- sund, Denmark) directly on the skin lesions for two minutes in the room with constant temperature (20~24 degree Celsius) and humidity (28~38 percent).

This measurement was performed to determine pigmentation.

20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Bo Young Chung, M.D., PhD, Department of Dermatology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 14, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 14, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-11-007

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intense Pulsed Light

Clinical Trials on fractional Er:YAG laser

Subscribe