Mobilization With Movement in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

January 30, 2021 updated by: İSMAİL CEYLAN

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Movement With Mobilization Technique for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Peripheral nerve impingement neuropathies are the most common mononeuropathies encountered in clinical practice. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) occurs as a result of compression of the median nerve as it passes through the carpal tunnel, a narrow osteofibrous canal. CTS is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity, affecting approximately 3% of the general population.

Massage and mobilization techniques are used in the treatment of CTS due to their analgesic effects. The painless mobilization with movement technique (MWM, developed by Brian Mulligan) is a manual therapy method applies to correct the limitation of movement in the joint and to relieve pain and functional disorders. Many studies have shown that MWM technique provides faster and momentary painless joint movement compared to other physical therapy modalities.

The patient group with CTS has a large place in the general population and long treatment processes cause both labour loss and economic loss. In the literature review, there is no study examining the effects of MWM in patients with CTS. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of MWM technique in cases with CTS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this study, 45 CTS patients with age range 18-65 who applied to Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Training and Research Hospital were examined. The individuals included in the study were divided into two groups according to the paired randomization method. These groups were control and intervention groups. Traditional physiotherapy methods were applied to the control group, traditional physiotherapy and MWM techniques were applied to the intervention group. Traditional physiotherapy methods were included; Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Ultrasound (US), tendon-nerve gliding exercises, night splint, stretching and strengthening exercises.

For the evaluation of patients; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), wrist goniometric measurements, grip strength measurement, pinch strength measurement, edema measurement, Electromyography (EMG), Nelson Hand Reaction Test, Upper Limb Disorders Arm Shoulder and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH), Boston Carpal The Tunnel Injury Questionnaire and Michigan Hand Result Questionnaire (MHRQ) was used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • İç Anadolu
      • Kırşehir, İç Anadolu, Turkey, 40500
        • Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lasting longer than six weeks in the area associated with the n. medianus; Paresthesia, pain, and vasomotor symptoms.

A positive Phalen, Tinel or carpal compression test on wrist examination. In neurophysiological evaluation mild to moderate severity of the n. medianus lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Radial or ulnar nerve sensory-motor findings accompanying the current condition. Under the age of 18 and over the age of 65.

    • Having undergone upper extremity surgery or steroid injection for any reason. Having a history of another disease or trauma in the upper extremity.
    • Having a history of systemic disease such as diabetes or thyroid disease, which may lead to CTS.

Pregnancy.

  • Any contraindications for the patient to exercise,
  • The patient has any mental problems.
  • In neurophysiological evaluation severe n. medianus lesion severity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mobilization with movement

Mobilization with movement technique and traditional physiotherapy were applied to the intervention group. For mobilization with movement technique, the patient was asked to actively flex and extend the wrist with the forearm in neutral in a sitting position on a treatment table, and the pain was asked. The painful side was determined according to the patient's statement.

In a patient whose painful side was flexion, the wrist joint was shifted manually (with the help of the web space of both hands of the therapist) to the lateral and medial at the same time while the patient actively flexed the wrist. The treatment was done 3 times a week for 4 weeks.

Physiotherapy
Active Comparator: Conventional
Traditional physiotherapy techniques were applied to the intervention group. Conventional TENS type was used. Current transition time was set as 50-100 µs. TENS application is performed at a frequency of 100 Hertz for 20 minutes in amplitude that does not cause muscle contraction in the patient and creates a feeling of numbness and tingling. Continuous ultrasound type was applied with full contact technique. Ultrasound treatment was applied over the transverse carpal ligament in the wrist with circular movements towards the proximal and distal at a speed of 1-2.5 cm per second, at a dose of 1 W / cm2, for 6 minutes, with a frequency of 3 MHz. And; tendon-nerve gliding exercises, night splint, stretching and strengthening exercises applied. The treatment was done 3 times a week for 4 weeks.
Physiotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire
Time Frame: 0-4 week
The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100.
0-4 week
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 0-4 week
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points.
0-4 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)
Time Frame: 0-4 week
The MHQ is a patient-rated questionnaire, which means the patients evaluate their health state themselves. It was developed using the psychometric principles for psychological assessments (Reliability, Validity, Standardization, and Freedom from bias). The questionnaire consists of 37 items that can be grouped into six main categories (scored 0 (no disability) to 100). Special to this assessment is the inclusion of items about aesthetics, which is often regarded as very important by patients, and the separate evaluation of the left and the right side. These two categories are often overlooked in other similar assessments which might e.g. focus more on the overall disability or pain experience. The questions are directed towards patients' experiences with the hand/upper extremity during the past week.
0-4 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: İsmail Ceylan, PhD., Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Chronic

Clinical Trials on TENS, US, exercise

3
Subscribe