- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04733469
EMPOWER 3: Improving Palliative Care Health Literacy and Utilization (EMPOWER 3)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
- University Medical Center
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
- Tulane University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult, age 18 or older
Meets criteria for 2a or 2b. 2a) The patient's doctor believes they may be appropriate for palliative cancer care OR 2b) The patient has a new diagnosis, recurrence, or progression of cancer in the past 90 days AND any of the following:
Advanced cancer, such as:
- Lung Cancer: Stage IIIB or IV non-small cell, or extensive stage small cell
- Breast Cancer: Stage IV
- Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancers: Unresectable stage III or stage IV
- Genitourinary (GU) Cancers: Stage IV
- Melanoma: Stage IV
Hematologic Malignancies
- Leukemia (e.g., acute myeloid leukemia [AML], acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL]): advanced stage, treatment refractory, poor prognosis cell type or chromosomal abnormalities, older age
- Lymphoma: Stage IV or treatment refractory Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Multiple Myeloma: elevated β2-microglobulin, albumin <3.5, PCLI >1%, CRP >6µg/mL, elevated LDH, plasmablastic morphology, or abnormal chromosome 13
- Advanced heart, lung, renal (kidney), or liver disease
- Two or more severe symptoms (≥7 on 0-10 scale): pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, bad appetite, shortness of breath, depression, or anxiety
- Patient can understand spoken or written English
- Patient receives care in southeast Louisiana
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known history of receiving specialty palliative care or hospice
- Significant psychiatric or other co-morbid disease that would prohibit informed consent or participation in the study
- Unlikely to complete any follow-up surveys
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Multimedia Psychoeducational Intervention + Enhanced Usual Care
Intervention participants receive the Multimedia Psychoeducational Intervention in addition to Enhanced Usual Care
|
The Multimedia Psychoeducational Intervention includes a multimedia educational video plus additional resources to reinforce the video content. The Multimedia Psychoeducational Intervention includes the following:
Enhanced Usual Care refers to usual care plus minor enhancement to improve quality and standardization. Enhanced Usual Care includes the following:
|
|
Other: Enhanced Usual Care
Control participants receive Enhanced Usual Care
|
Enhanced Usual Care refers to usual care plus minor enhancement to improve quality and standardization. Enhanced Usual Care includes the following:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Aim 1: Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS)
Time Frame: Post-test of Visit 1, typically day 1
|
Percentage correct on 13 items; higher scores indicate greater knowledge
|
Post-test of Visit 1, typically day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Aim 2a: Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9)
Time Frame: Post-test of Visit 1, typically day 1
|
Total score from 0-36; higher scores indicate more positive attitudes
|
Post-test of Visit 1, typically day 1
|
|
Aim 2b: Palliative Care Utilization
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
|
Utilization of palliative care (presence/absence)
|
Up to 90 days
|
|
Aim 3a: Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions
Time Frame: Follow-up at 14, 90, and 180 days
|
Total score from 8-40 on 8 items from PROMIS self-efficacy for managing symptoms and self-efficacy for managing emotions items banks; higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy
|
Follow-up at 14, 90, and 180 days
|
|
Aim 3b: PROMIS Emotional Distress
Time Frame: Follow-up at 14, 90, and 180 days
|
Total score from 8-40 on 8 items from the PROMIS Depression and Anxiety item banks; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
|
Follow-up at 14, 90, and 180 days
|
|
Aim 3c: Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)-Physical
Time Frame: Follow-up at 14, 90, and 180 days
|
Total score from 0-60 on 6 ESAS ratings of pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, poor appetite, and difficulty breathing; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
|
Follow-up at 14, 90, and 180 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Exploratory: Brief COPE Inventory
Time Frame: Follow-up at 14 days
|
Total score from 6-24 on 6 Brief COPE Inventory items measuring denial, acceptance (reverse-coded), and self-blame; higher scores indicate less effective coping
|
Follow-up at 14 days
|
|
Exploratory: PROMIS Anger
Time Frame: Follow-up at 90 days
|
Total score from 2-10 on 2 items from the PROMIS Anger item bank; higher scores indicate more anger
|
Follow-up at 90 days
|
|
Exploratory: PROMIS Positive Affect
Time Frame: Follow-up at 90 days
|
Total score from 2-10 on 2 items from the PROMIS Positive Affect item bank; higher scores indicate more positive affect
|
Follow-up at 90 days
|
|
Exploratory: PROMIS Stress
Time Frame: Follow-up at 90 days
|
Total score from 4-20 on 4 items from the PROMIS Stress item bank; higher scores indicate more stress
|
Follow-up at 90 days
|
|
Exploratory: PROMIS General Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Follow-up at 90 days
|
Total score from 4-20 on 4 items from the PROMIS General Self-Efficacy item bank; higher scores indicate more stress
|
Follow-up at 90 days
|
|
Exploratory: Medication Adherence
Time Frame: Follow-up at 90 days
|
Rating from 1-6 (Very poor to Excellent) for quality of medication adherence in the past 30 days; higher scores indicate better adherence
|
Follow-up at 90 days
|
|
Exploratory: PROMIS Emotional Support
Time Frame: Follow-up at 180 days
|
Total score from 2-10 on 2 items from the PROMIS Emotional Support item bank; higher scores indicate more emotional support
|
Follow-up at 180 days
|
|
Exploratory: PROMIS Cognitive Function
Time Frame: Follow-up at 180 days
|
Total score from 4-20 on 4 items from the PROMIS Cognitive Function item bank; higher scores indicate better cognitive function
|
Follow-up at 180 days
|
|
Exploratory: PROMIS Meaning and Purpose
Time Frame: Follow-up at 180 days
|
Total score from 2-10 on 2 items from the PROMIS Meaning and Purpose item bank; higher scores indicate more meaning and purpose
|
Follow-up at 180 days
|
|
Exploratory: Quality of Life in Neurologic Disorders (Neuro-QoL) Concern with Death and Dying
Time Frame: Follow-up at 180 days
|
Total score from 2-10 on 2 items from the Neuro-QoL Concern with Death and Dying item bank; ; higher scores indicate more concern
|
Follow-up at 180 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Hoerger, PhD, MSCR, MBA, Tulane University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 134579-RSG-20-058-01-PCSM
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.