One Year Clinical Evaluation of Shade Matching and Patient Satisfaction of New Gradient Technology Monolithic Zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) Compared to Lithium Disilicate Crowns in Dental Esthetic Zone

February 3, 2021 updated by: Noha Khaled Abd El Kader Eid, Cairo University

One Year Clinical Evaluation of Shade Matching and Patient Satisfaction of New Gradient Technology Monolithic Zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) Compared to Lithium Disilicate Crowns in Dental Esthetic Zone (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Although zirconia is widely used for fabrication of restorations, the 3Y-TZP zirconia where limited for posterior region for its high strength and bad esthetic. While the 5Y-TZP zirconia is limited for the anterior region due to its good esthetic and low strength. For that reason, the introduction of the new gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) (IPS e.max Zircad Prime) has offered a solution to solve this problem be combining the esthetic of 5Y-TZP and the high strength of 3Y-TZP. The aim of the present study is to evaluate shade matching to natural tooth and patient satisfaction of the new gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) and lithium disilicate ceramic crowns.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Restorative dentistry is a mix of science and art. The success of restorative dentistry is determined on the basis of functional and esthetic results. Closely matching natural teeth with an artificial restoration can be one of the most challenging procedures in restorative dentistry. Natural teeth vary greatly in color and shape.The color of a ceramic restoration is affected by the shade of the ceramic material, its thickness, and, the color of the underlying material. The restoration's color is influenced by ceramic firing temperature, the color of the prepared tooth, translucency and thickness of veneering porcelain.

The rational of this study is newly introduced gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) (IPS e.max Zircad Prime) with improved optical properties to solve the drawbacks of esthetic properties of zirconia.

Null hypothesis of the study will be:

  • There would be no difference in shade matching of the new gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) and lithium disilicate ceramic crowns used in the esthetic zone.
  • There would be no difference in patient satisfaction of new gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) and lithium disilicate ceramic crowns at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12 months used in the esthetic zone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Rana Mahmoud sherif, professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. From 21-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.
  2. Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations.
  3. Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures.
  4. Patient with thick gingival biotype.
  5. Patients with teeth problems indicated for single all ceramic restoration in esthetic zone

    1. Badly decayed teeth.
    2. Teeth restored with large filling restorations.
    3. Endodontically treated teeth.
    4. Malformed teeth.
    5. Malposed teeth (Tilted, over-erupted, rotated, etc.).
    6. Spacing between teeth in esthetic zone.
  6. Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient less than 21 or more than 50 years.
  2. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases.
  3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients.
  4. Pregnant women.
  5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth.
  6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
  7. Patient with periodontal problems.
  8. Patients with malocclusion or parafunctional habits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: natural tooth
natural tooth is composed of enamel. Enamel is on the surface of every tooth and it has a natural hue of white. However, the underlying dentin layer has a slightly yellowish color. This yellowish hue shows through the enamel in almost everyone
Experimental: lithium disilicate (IPS e-max) ceramic crown
monolithic lithium disilicate (IPS e-max) ceramic crown for crowns in esthetic zone
monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic crown
Experimental: New gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\ 3Y-TZP) IPS e.max ZirCad Prime ceramic crown
conjunction with the two zirconium oxide raw materials 3Y-TZP and 5Y-TZP is responsible for producing a continuous, seamless progression of the shade and translucency within the material

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
shade match
Time Frame: 1 year
measured by Modified United States Public Health Service criteria (USPHS criteria) Score Alpha(A):matches tooth Bravo(B):acceptable mismatch Charlie(C):unacceptable mismatch
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shade match
Time Frame: 1 year
measured by Vita Easyshade V spectrophotometer
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year
measured by Visual Analog Scale Questionnaire (VAS Questionnaire) ("0" unsatisfied - "10" satisfied)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endodontically Treated Teeth

Clinical Trials on natural tooth

Subscribe