Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Unclear Preoperative Localisation Studies

February 4, 2021 updated by: Fabio Medas, University of Cagliari

Surgical Approach and Outcomes in Patients With Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Unclear Preoperative Localisation Studies

Although some surgeons still consider bilateral neck exploration as the best approach for primary hyperparathyroidism, nowadays most of them perceive the mini-invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) as the best option for patients with concordant preoperative studies. Nevertheless, the consensus is heterogeneous for patients with unclear localisation studies, with some surgeons deeming BNE as mandatory and others suggesting that a mini-invasive approach is still possible if combined with IOPTH monitoring. In our research, we focused on patients with unclear preoperative localisation studies, to better understand the factors that can determine discordant or negative results between US and MIBI scan, in order to choose the best surgical approach and to evaluate the outcomes in this kind of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an unicentric, retrospective study on patients who underwent surgery for PHP from January 2004 to June 2020 at our Department of General and Endocrine surgery, which is a tertiary referral centre for parathyroid disease. Ethical approval was released from our Local Independent Ethical Committee. Patients involved in the study subjects gave informed consent to the work.

In our study, we included only patients who underwent both US and MIBI preoperatively. The exclusion criteria were the association of total or partial thyroidectomy planned preoperatively for thyroid disease, reoperative surgery for persistent or recurrent PHP, and incomplete data or follow-up.

The primary aims of this study were:

  • To identify predictive factors of unclear preoperative localisation studies.
  • To evaluate if a mini-invasive approach is feasible in this kind of patients, considering the incidence of persistent PHP as the main outcome.

The secondary outcomes were:

  • To assess the role of IOPTH assay in patients with unclear localisation studies.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative localisation studies in our series, particularly in patients with discordant or negative US and MIBI scan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

242

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • CA
      • Monserrato, CA, Italy, 09042
        • Policlinico di Monserrato
    • Cagliari
      • Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, 09040
        • Policlinico di Monserrato

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with concomitant thyroid disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Concordant preoperative studies
Patients with concordant neck ultrasound and MIBI scan
Parathyroidectomy
Other: Unclear preoperative studies
Patients with discordant or negative neck ultrasound and MIBI scan
Parathyroidectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical failure
Time Frame: 6 months
Incidence of persistent hyperparathyroidism
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PHP-DISC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Subscribe