Effects of Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonists on Acute Pancreatitis

April 20, 2023 updated by: Asbjørn Mohr Drewes

Effects of Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonists on Acute Pancreatitis - An Investigator-initiated, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial

This study will investigate the effect of peripheral acting opioid antagonist (PAMORA) on the disease course of patients with acute inflammation of the pancreas (acute pancreatitis). The study will be conducted by treating hospitalized patients with acute pancreatitis with a PAMORA (methylnaltrexone).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this study, the effects of peripheral acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORA) on disease development and progression in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) will be investigated. Patients with AP will be administered Methylnaltrexone (Relistor®) intravenously. This medication is defined as the investigational product. Relistor® is approved and sold on the Danish marked for treatment of opioid-induced constipation. This PAMORA have not previously been investigated in patients with pancreatitis. The dose regimes for this study will be according to label. It has previously been shown, in patients with opioid-induced obstipation and healthy subjects, that opioid antagonism incl. PAMORA treatment increases gut motility, relaxes gastrointestinal sphincters, increases the intestinal water content and improves the immune response, without affecting analgesia. The affinity of PAMORAs to the µ-opioid receptors is much stronger than opioid analgesics. Therefore, they as antagonists have the potential to counteract the harmful effects of opioids on the gut mucosa, bacterial translocation and inflammation despite the high levels of exogenous opioids present in patients with pancreatitis. PAMORAs do not cross the blood-brain barrier and consequently do not interfere with analgesia or other central effects of opioids.

We hypothesize that treatment with the PAMORA methylnaltrexone will antagonize the harmful effects of opioids without reducing analgesia in patients with AP and hence reduce disease severity and improve clinical outcomes. If successful, this sub-study will for the first time document the effects of a targeted pharmacotherapy in AP with the potential benefit of improved patient outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bispebjerg, Denmark
        • Digestive Disease Center K, Bispebjerg University Hospital
      • Hvidovre, Denmark
        • Gastrounit, Hvidovre University Hospital
      • Svendborg, Denmark
        • Odense Pancreas Center
    • Jutland
      • Aalborg, Jutland, Denmark, 9000
        • Mech-Sense, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent before any study specific procedures
  • Able to read and understand Danish
  • Male or female age between 18 and 80 years
  • The researcher believes that the participant understands what the study entails, is capable of following instructions, can attend when needed, and is expected to complete the study
  • The investigator will ensure that fertile female participants have a negative pregnancy test before treatment initiation and use contraception during the study period. The following methods of contraception, if properly used, are generally considered reliable: oral contraceptives, patch contraceptives, injection contraceptives, vaginal contraceptive ring, intrauterine device, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner, double barrier (condom and pessary), or sexual abstinence. Methods of contraception will be documented in the source documents
  • At least two of the following criteria need to be fulfilled to establish a diagnosis of AP (according to the revised Atlanta criteria (16)): i) abdominal pain consistent with AP (acute onset of a persistent, severe, epigastric pain often radiating to the back); ii) serum amylase activity at least three times greater than the upper limit of normal; and iii) characteristic findings of AP on diagnostic imaging
  • Predicted moderate or severe AP based on 2 or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria upon admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Definitive chronic pancreatitis according to the M-ANNHEIM criteria
  • Known allergy towards study medication
  • Known or suspected major stenosis or perforation of the intestines
  • Known or suspected abdominal cancer (incl. intestine, pancreas and the biliary tree)
  • Pre-existing renal insufficiency (defined as habitual estimated glomerular filtration rate below 45)
  • Severe pre-existing comorbidities (assessed by investigator upon inclusion)
  • Severe non-pancreaticobiliary infections or sepsis caused by non-pancreaticobiliary disease
  • Child-Pugh class B or C liver cirrhosis
  • Females that are currently lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo treatment
Placebo consisting of Ringer's lactate in matched volume to active drug is added to 1000 mL Ringer's lactate solution and given as a continues infusion over 24 hours using an infusion pump.
Active drug/placebo is given for the first 5 days of admission.
Active Comparator: Methylnaltrexone treatment
0.15 mg/kg methylnaltrexone will be dissolved in 1000 mL Ringer's lactate solution and given as a continues infusion over 24 hours using an infusion pump.
Active drug/placebo is given for the first 5 days of admission.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pancreatitis activity scoring system
Time Frame: 48 hours after randomization

Difference in Pancreatitis activity scoring system (PASS) score between the methylnaltrexone group and the placebo group. The PASS-score is a weighted score of presence of organ failure, number of criterias of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome fulfilled, abdominal pain (0-10), morphine equivalent dose (mg) and tolerance to solid food. Minimum value is 0 and higher score is equal to higher disease activity.

Documentation for the PASS can be found on the following link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519418/

48 hours after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pancreatitis activity scoring system
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference PASS scores between subgroups
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference in assessments of circulating proinflammatory marker
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
C-Reactive Protein (mg/L)
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference in assessments of circulating pro- and anti-inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Interleukin-6, Interleukin-8, Interleukin-18, Tumor necrosis factor alpha, Cluster of Differentiation 163 (serum) (all measured in pg/mL)
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Intestinal permeability
Time Frame: From 48 to 72 hours after randomization
Difference in intestinal permeability between subgroups using the oral polyethylene glycol 400/4000 test
From 48 to 72 hours after randomization
Intestinal motility
Time Frame: 5 (+/- 1 day) after randomization
Difference in intestinal motility assessed by means of gut/colon transit using a CT-based radiopaque marker method between subgroups
5 (+/- 1 day) after randomization
Pancreatic complications
Time Frame: Day 5 (+/- 1 day) after randomization
Difference in pancreatic complications (e.g. edema, fluid collections and necrosis) assessed and quantified with contrast-enhanced CT
Day 5 (+/- 1 day) after randomization
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference between subgroups in pain intensity measured with the questionaire "modified Brief Pain Inventory short form" on visual analogue scale from 0-10 (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain).
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Gut function (BSFS)
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by The Bristol Stool Form Scale for assessment of stool frequency as well as stool consistency (scale from 1-7, where 1 is firmeste and 7 is softest)
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Gut function (GSRS)
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale which is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea and constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale, where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Quantification of analgesics
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference between subgroups in given dose of analgesics (separated into opioids and non-opioids) based on name, administration route and dose
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Use of nutritional support
Time Frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Difference between subgroups in the use of nutritional support with registration of the used of either oral nutrition, enteral or parenteral nutrition.
24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit
Days of hospitalization
Time Frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge which ever comes first
Difference between subgroups in days of hospitalization and days on intensive ward
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge which ever comes first
Use of invasive treatment
Time Frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first
Difference between subgroups in use of invasive treatment (e.g. use of drain or surgery) measured in type and frequency of use
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first
Mortality
Time Frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first
Difference between subgroups in mortality rate
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first
Health resource utilization
Time Frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first
Difference in health resource utilization (measured in frequency and type of health services used (e.g. blood sample, MRI etc.) that can be converted into danish currency for economic analyses) between subgroups based on service codes (all services have unique service codes stored digitally).
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first
Disease severity
Time Frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first
Disease severity classified by the revised Atlanta classification system in 3 levels; Mild, Moderate or Severe acute pancreatitis. (Mild acute pancreatitis, with no organ failure, local or systemic complications, Moderately severe acute pancreatitis is with presence of transient organ failure, local complications or exacerbation of co-morbid disease. Severe acute pancreatitis with persistent organ failure (>48 h).
Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PAMORA_AP, PAMORA-1
  • 2020-002313-18 (EudraCT Number)
  • N-20200060 (Other Identifier: North Denmark Region Committee in Health Research Ethics)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pancreatitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo treatment

Subscribe