Modified Periostal Pocket Flap Technique

May 17, 2022 updated by: Jesús Torres García Denche, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Modified Periostal Pocket Flap Technique: a Case Series

The aim of this study is to propose a modification of the original periostal pocket flap technique consisting in replacing the xenograft by a conglomerate which contains autologous bone obtained from the future implant site through biological drilling technique and PRGF (Plasma Rich in Growth Factors)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Materials and methods: 8 patients referred for implant placement and with a slight bucco-lingual (BL) width deficiency in alveolar bone were included in the study. Patients were placed dental implants and bone width was augmented by using the conglomerate mentioned above.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients included in this case series were collected from Clinica Dental Alcalá, were operated on by the same surgeon and fullfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a favorable bone density and favorable bone length but insufficient bone width that could compromise implant placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smokers (>10 cigarettes per day) and patients with severe systemic disease ( ASA III or IV - American Society of Anaesthesiology)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
unique group

After local anesthesia, a full thickness flap was elevated from the lingual wall and a partial thickness flap was performed in the buccal one. After that, the buccal periosteum was detached and dental implants were placed following the biological drilling protocol, getting autologous bone particles from the implant site.

Patient's blood collection was performed and the plasm obtained was poured down on a sterile container and mixed with autologous bone particles collected previously during the drilling procedure. Finally the graft was placed in the pocket prepared previously and the surgical wound was sutured in two planes.

After local anesthesia, a full thickness flap was elevated from the lingual wall and a partial thickness flap was performed in the buccal one. After that, the buccal periosteum was detached and dental implants were placed following the biological drilling protocol, getting autologous bone particles from the implant site.

Patient's blood collection was performed and the plasm obtained was poured down on a sterile container and mixed with autologous bone particles collected previously during the drilling procedure. Finally the graft was placed in the pocket prepared previously and the surgical wound was sutured in two planes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of bone augmentation
Time Frame: 4 months
Volume of bone augmentation of the surgical sites was measured in the postoperative parasagittal CT scans using a region of interest (ROI) containing the entire bone box regenerated area using the closed polygon tool of the OsiriX software
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jesús Torres, Associate, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 24, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P-15/568

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Regeneration

Clinical Trials on Modified Periostal Pocket Flap Technique

Subscribe