Comparison of Hypothermic Versus Normothermic Ex-vivo Preservation. (DCDNet)

July 24, 2022 updated by: Davide Ghinolfi, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana

Optimization of an Evidence-based Organizational Model of Liver and Pancreas Transplant Using Cardiac Death Donors: a Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study for the Comparison of Hypothermic Versus Normothermic Ex-vivo Preservation.

Study groups:

The study is a multicenter (Pisa and Milan), prospective, randomized study comparing D-HOPE (HMP) vs NMP in DCD and ECD-DBD (extended criteria brain-dead donors). Once a DCD or a DBD with extended criteria (ECD-DBD) meets the inclusion criteria, they are randomized as follow:

  1. 20 liver grafts from DCD after normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) matching the inclusion criteria are randomized 1:1 to hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) vs normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and then transplanted.
  2. 40 liver grafts from ECD-DBD matching the inclusion criteria are randomized 1:1 to hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) vs normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and then transplanted

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The persistent mismatch between patients waiting for a liver transplant (LT) and grafts availability promoted the use of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Italian law requires 20 minutes of continous flatline electrocardiogram to declared individual's circulatory death and such a long period of warm ischemia time forced the development of protocols using abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) followed by ex-vivo graft reperfusion by means of machine perfusion technology (MP) for its potential to minimize ischemia/reperfusion damage and promote organ repair and reconditioning prior to transplantation. An extensive evaluation of all DCD donors might increase donation rate by 30%, but, while kidney transplant from DCD donors is well implemented, no definitive data exist on the optimal use of NRP and MP in liver and pancreas transplantation and an organizational model is far to be implemented. Moreover, a randomized trial comparing hypothermic vs normothermic ex-vivo perfusion has never been performed. The proposed project will perform a pilot, open, randomized, prospective trials to evaluate the sequential use of NRP followed by ex-vivo MP (hypothermic (HMP) vs normothermic (NMP)) by measuring several indicators of organ damage and recovery with the target to set up the optimal organizational model for DCD donation:

  1. Twenty LT from DCD donors after NRP (considered transplantable for the acceptance criteria in use) will be randomized 1:1 to ex-vivo HMP or NMP (multicenter study together with the center in Milan)
  2. 40 liver grafts from ECD-DBD matching the inclusion criteria are randomized 1:1 to hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) vs normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and then transplanted To assess organ damage and repair capacity, the following investigations will be performed: -biomarkers of apoptosis, necrosis, innate-mediated inflammation and its resolution, angiogenesis and thrombosis during NRP -circulating biomarkers indicating damage, proliferation, angiogenetic and tissue remodelling factors; a targeted-metabolomic and lipidomic profiling during ex-vivo HMP or NMP in the perfusate and on blood samples in the peri and post-operative period; bile composition on graft subjected to NMP. Evaluation of necrosis, apoptosis and proliferation, immunohistochemical analysis, a targeted-metabolomic and lipidomic profiling, ATP measurement, and electronic microscopy investigations will be performed on liver tissue and bile duct biopsies after NRP, before and after ex-vivo reperfusion, and immediately after reperfusion in the recipient (only for transplantable grafts) Based on the collected data a new algorithm of organ evaluation, procurement, preservation and reconditioning will be formulated and disseminated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Pisa, Italy, 56124
        • Recruiting
        • UO Chirurgia Epatica e del Trapianto di Fegato
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fabio Melandro, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

GRAFT:

Inclusion criteria:

DCD:

  • no absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
  • donor age ≤70 years
  • witnessed and documented cardiac arrest
  • macro-vescicular steatosis <30% at liver biopsy
  • necrosis <5% at liver biopsy
  • fibrosis <2 as per Ishak's score at liver biopsy
  • arteriolar thickening <60% at liver biopsy
  • WIT ≤160 minutes
  • ALT <1000 UI/L during NRP
  • downward trend lactate during NRP

DBD:

  • no absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
  • donor age > 70 years
  • macro-steatosis between 30 and 50% at liver biopsy

Exclusion criteria:

DCD:

  • absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
  • donor age >70 years
  • macro-vescicular steatosis >30% at liver biopsy
  • necrosis >5% at liver biopsy
  • fibrosis >2 as per Ishak's score at liver biopsy
  • severe macroangiopathy (arteriolar thickening >60% at liver biopsy)
  • WIT >160 minutes
  • ALT >1000 UI/L during NRP
  • uptrend lactate during NRP

DBD:

  • absolute contraindications as per Italian National Transplant center (CNT)
  • donor age < 70 years
  • macro-steatosis between > 50% at liver biopsy

RECIPIENTS

Inclusion criteria:

  • Subject must be greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
  • Subject with end-stage liver disease who is actively listed for primary liver transplantation
  • Subject, or a legally authorized representative, has given informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subject is currently listed as a UNOS status 1A.
  • Subject is requiring oxygen therapy via ventilator/respiratory support.
  • Subject is planned to undergo simultaneous solid organ transplant.
  • Subject is pregnant at the time of transplant.
  • Subject MELD score 25 or higher
  • Subject receives re-transplantation of liver.
  • Any medical conditions contro-indicating the use of DCD grafts at transplant surgeon/hepatologist evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hypothermic Machine Perfusion
uDCD and cDCD after Normothermic Regional Perfusion matching the inclusion criteria, ECD matching the inclusion criteria, uDCD and cDCD exceeding the inclusion criteria.
The perfusion system was primed with 4 L of Belzer machine perfusion solution University of Wisconsin Machine Perfusion Solution (Bridge for Life, Ltd., Columbia, SC). The arterial and portal pressures were set at 25 mm Hg with a flow and at 3-4 mm Hg with a continuous flow, respectively. The oxygen flow was set at 0.25 L/minute. The target liver temperature was between 4°C and 10°C.
Other Names:
  • Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP)
Experimental: Normothermic Machine Perfusion
uDCD and cDCD after Normothermic Regional Perfusion matching the inclusion criteria, ECD matching the inclusion criteria, uDCD and cDCD exceeding the inclusion criteria.
Grafts were perfused at 37°C in an OR next to the transplant OR and under medical supervision using a blood-based perfusate. Initial perfusate temperature was set at 20°C and raised by 1°C every 2 minutes. Oxygenation was provided by an anesthesia ventilator initially set at 4 L/minute with 30% fraction of inspired oxygen, and later adjusted based on perfusate pH, partial pressure of oxygen, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide. Blood gas analyses were drawn every 20 minutes during the first hour and every 30 minutes thereafter with the aim to maintain a physiological pH and ionogram result, and a partial pressure of oxygen between 200 and 250 mm Hg. Perfusate glucose, transaminases, and lactate were measured during NMP as were bile production and quality (pH, sodium, glycemia, lactate, and HCO3)
Other Names:
  • Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of graft loss
Time Frame: at 6 months postoperatively
Death of patient, relisting or Retransplantation. Composite Outcome
at 6 months postoperatively
Rate of Ischemic Type Biliary Lesions (ITBL)
Time Frame: at 6 months postoperatively
ITBL as assessed by MRI / MRCP. Composite Outcome
at 6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-year graft survival
Time Frame: 1-year postoperatively
1-year postoperatively
1-year patients survival
Time Frame: 1-year postoperatively
1-year postoperatively
level of BCL-2/BAX at the liver histology
Time Frame: after 2 hours of perfusion
BCL-2/BAX is members of the Bcl-2 family of regulator proteins that regulate cell death and correlates with graft loss
after 2 hours of perfusion
level of Soluble Keratin 18 in the perfusate
Time Frame: after 2 hours of perfusion
Soluble Keratin 18 is a marker of necrosis and apoptosis and correlates with graft loss
after 2 hours of perfusion
level of HMGB1in the perfusate
Time Frame: after 2 hours of perfusion
HMGB1 Acts as danger associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecule that amplifies immune responses during tissue injury and correlates with graft loss
after 2 hours of perfusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End Stage Liver DIsease

Clinical Trials on Hypothermic Machine Perfusion

Subscribe