- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04755595
Combination Facial Aesthetic Treatment in Millennials
December 22, 2024 updated by: Jared Jagdeo, MD, MS, State University of New York - Downstate Medical Center
With 63% of consumers willing to consider investing in facial aesthetics and 73% of consumers worldwide expecting to invest in aesthetic treatments in the upcoming year, it is imperative to explore patient satisfaction and psychosocial impact of a multimodal aesthetic treatment in a millennial cohort.
The investigators hypothesize that a combination approach to facial aesthetic treatment in a millennial cohort will result in increased patient-reported satisfaction in multiple areas, including perception of aging concerns and quality of life.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a single-center, prospective, rater-blinded, pilot study to evaluate patient satisfaction with facial aesthetic treatment using a combination of botulinum toxin and dermal fillers.
The three types of injectables are Botox Cosmetic (onabotulinumtoxinA), Juvéderm Voluma XC (hyaluronic acid gel filler), and Juvéderm Volbella XC (hyaluronic acid gel filler).
Twenty individuals who belong to the millennial generation (i.e., born between January 1, 1981 and December 31, 1996)1 and meet eligibility criteria will be enrolled.
Study participants will receive all three injectables during a single procedure, with an optional touch-up treatment at 2 weeks.
The primary endpoint is the change in satisfaction after facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale.
Other outcome measures include various FACE-Q Aesthetic scales, digital skin imaging analysis, photographs, and rater-blinded clinical assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11203
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
24 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Date of birth between January 1, 1981 and December 31, 1996
- Naiveté to facial injections of botulinum toxin and dermal filler
- Desire to receive all three facial cosmetic injectables in the study
- Suitable candidate to receive facial injectables, as determined by clinician judgment
- Provision of written informed consent for all study procedures
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Desire to receive only one or two of the facial injectables
- Dermatologic or medical conditions at the injection sites that may be exacerbated by the study procedures (e.g., severe acne, active infection, open sores or lesions, history of cold sores)
- Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (e.g., heart failure, coronary artery disease)
- Pre-existing swallowing or respiratory disorders (e.g., dysphagia, asthma, COPD)
- Peripheral motor neuropathy disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or neuromuscular junctional disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome)
- Known hypersensitivity or allergies to any of the components of the administered drugs/devices in the study (e.g., Gram-positive bacterial proteins, lidocaine)
- History of anaphylaxis or multiple severe allergies
- History of a bleeding or coagulation disorder
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
- Current and/or scheduled use of the following medications: immunosuppressants, anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin, heparin, rivaroxaban), antiplatelets (e.g., clopidogrel, ticagrelor, NSAIDs), antibiotics (e.g., aminoglycosides), anticholinergics, muscle relaxants
- Procedures or treatments to the face in the past 14 days (e.g., chemical peel, laser surgery, microdermabrasion)
- Plan to undergo elective cosmetic procedure on the face (e.g., laser surgery, plastic surgery, physician-strength chemical peel) during the study
- Any medical condition(s) that could be compromised by participating in the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Facial aesthetic treatment
Study participants will receive all three injectables: Botox Cosmetic (onabotulinumtoxinA), Juvéderm Voluma XC (hyaluronic acid gel filler), and Juvéderm Volbella XC (hyaluronic acid gel filler) during a single procedure, with an optional touch-up treatment at 2 weeks.
|
Acetylcholine release inhibitor and a neuromuscular blocking agent
Other Names:
Gel implants consisting of cross-linked hyaluronic acid
Gel implants consisting of cross-linked hyaluronic acid
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess changes in patient's satisfaction with their appearance following a combination facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale.
This tool consists of several questions.
For each question, the study participant selects a number from 1 to 4. Higher number are associated with higher satisfaction with facial appearance.
The raw scores of the primary outcome measure were transformed by the Rasch measurement method into a 0-to-100 point scale.
|
Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
FACE-Q Appraisal of Lines Overall
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess changes in patient dissatisfaction with the appearance of overall facial lines, using the FACE-Q Appraisal of Lines: Overall Scale.
The tool consists of ten questions regarding self-perception of overall facial lines.
For each question, study participants select a number from 1 to 4, with higher numbers reflecting greater dissatisfaction with facial lines.
The total score is tallied.
The minimum total score is 10 and the maximum total score is 40.
A higher total score is associated with greater dissatisfaction with facial lines.
The mean total score at baseline and 2 months post procedure are reported.
|
Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
|
FACE-Q Expectations Scale
Time Frame: At baseline
|
To assess patient expectations regarding the impact of facial aesthetic treatment on their lives, using the FACE-Q Expectations Scale.
This tool consists of eight statements.
For each statement, the study participant selects a number from 1 to 4, where 1 represents "definitely disagree", 2 represents "somewhat disagree", 3 represents "somewhat agree", and 4 represents "definitely agree".
The total score of the statements is tallied.
The minimum total score is 8 and the maximum total score is 32.
The higher the total score, the greater positive impact the participants believe the treatments will have on their lives.
The mean total score at baseline is reported.
|
At baseline
|
|
FACE-Q Social Function Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess changes in psychosocial factors after facial aesthetic treatment, using FACE-Q Social Function Scale.
This tool consists of eight statements.
For each statement, the study participant selects a number from 1 to 4, where 1 represents "definitely disagree", 2 represents "somewhat disagree", 3 represents "somewhat agree", and 4 represents "definitely agree".
The total score of the statements is tallied for each patient.
The minimum total score is 8 and the maximum total score is 32.
A higher total score reflects greater social functioning.
The mean total score is reported at baseline and 2 months after the procedure.
|
Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
|
FACE-Q Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess changes in self-perceived age after facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analogue Scale.
The study participant selects a number on the scale from -15 to +15.
0 corresponds to "I look my age".
-15 corresponds to "I look 15 years younger".
+15 corresponds to "I look 15 years older".
The mean score at baseline and 2 months post procedure are reported.
|
Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
|
FACE-Q Satisfaction With Cheeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess changes in patient satisfaction with the appearance of their cheeks after facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Cheeks Scale.
The tool consists of five questions regarding self-perception of cheeks.
For each question, study participants select a number from 1 to 4, with higher numbers reflecting greater satisfaction with cheeks.
The total score is tallied.
The minimum total score is 5 and the maximum total score is 20.
A higher total score is associated with greater satisfaction with cheeks.
The mean total score at baseline and 2 months post procedure are reported.
|
Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
|
FACE-Q Satisfaction With Outcome Scale
Time Frame: 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess patient satisfaction with facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome Scale.
This tool consists of six statements.
For each statement, the study participant selects a number from 1 to 4, where 1 represents "definitely disagree", 2 represents "somewhat disagree", 3 represents "somewhat agree", and 4 represents "definitely agree".
The total score is tallied.
The minimum total score is 6 and the maximum total score is 24.
A higher total score is associated with greater satisfaction with outcome.
The mean total score 2 months after the procedure is reported.
|
2 months after the procedure
|
|
FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess changes in psychosocial factors after facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Psychological Function Scale.
This tool consists of ten statements.
For each statement, the study participant selects a number from 1 to 4, where 1 represents "definitely disagree", 2 represents "somewhat disagree", 3 represents "somewhat agree", and 4 represents "definitely agree".
The total score is tallied.
The minimum total score is 10 and the maximum total score is 40.
A higher total score is associated with better psychological functioning.
The mean total score at baseline and 2 months after the procedure are reported.
|
Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
|
FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale
Time Frame: 2 months after the procedure compared to baseline
|
To assess changes in self-perceived age after facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale.
This tool consists of seven statements.
For each statement, the study participant selects a number from 1 to 4, where 1 represents "definitely disagree", 2 represents "somewhat disagree", 3 represents "somewhat agree", and 4 represents "definitely agree".
The total score is tallied.
The minimum total score is 7 and the maximum total score is 28.
A lower total score is associated with greater satisfaction with self-perceived age.
The mean total score at baseline and 2 months after the procedure are reported.
|
2 months after the procedure compared to baseline
|
|
FACE-Q Satisfaction With Lips
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
To assess changes in patient satisfaction with the appearance of their lips after facial aesthetic treatment, using the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Lips Scale.
The tool consists of ten questions regarding self-perception of lips.
For each question, study participants select a number from 1 to 4, with higher numbers reflecting greater satisfaction with lips.
The total score is tallied.
The minimum total score is 10 and the maximum total score is 40.
A higher total score is associated with greater satisfaction with lips.
The mean total score at baseline and 2 months post procedure are reported.
|
Baseline and 2 months after the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jared Jagdeo, MD, MS, SUNY Downstate Medical School
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 9, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 19, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
May 19, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 12, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
February 16, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 22, 2024
Last Verified
December 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1547415
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dermatological Non-Disease
-
BeShape Technologies Ltd.CompletedDermatological Non-DiseaseUnited States, Lithuania
-
Croma-Pharma GmbHSyneos HealthCompletedDermatological Non-DiseaseUnited States
-
University Hospital, ToursINSERM UMR 1246 SPHERERecruitingPsychological Well-Being | Acceptance of Visible Chronic Dermatological Disease | Disease Acceptance | Social SegregationFrance
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityCompletedDermatological EmergencyGermany
-
ProofPilotJoovvCompletedSkin Diseases | Eczema | Skin Condition | Acne | Skin Inflammation | Dermatological Non-DiseaseUnited States
-
University Hospital, ToulouseRecruitingSkin Diseases | Autoimmune Bullous Dermatosis | Dysimmune Dermatological Diseases | Auto-inflammatory Dermatological DiseasesFrance
-
University Hospital, RouenCompletedPemphigus | Dermatological DiseaseFrance
-
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&JCI)CompletedSkin Regeneration After Dermatological Facial Procedure With Fractional CO2 LaserBrazil
-
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbHCompletedPost Dermatological Surgery ScarsGermany
-
Afifa Muhammad Alameen Khalifa AlshaykhCompletedDermatological DisordersSudan
Clinical Trials on Botox Cosmetic Injectable Product
-
Unilever R&DMS Clinical Research Pvt. LtdNot yet recruiting
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedOsteoarthritis Knees BothEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknown
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
SVR GroupCompletedAtopic DermatitisBelgium
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingMyofascial Pain Syndrome | Myofascial Trigger Point PainEgypt
-
Pierre Fabre Dermo CosmetiqueCompleted
-
Pierre Fabre Dermo CosmetiqueCompleted
-
Amazentis SAproDERM GmbHCompleted