Clinical Performance of Composite Coronal Build -Up in Mutilated Primary Incisors: 3 Years Results

February 16, 2021 updated by: Associate Professor Dr. Rania Abdallah Nasr, Cairo University

Clinical Performance of Composite Coronal Build -Up in Mutilated Primary Incisors: Prospective Single Arm Study

Prospective single arm study was to evaluate the clinical success and/ or failure of resin-bonded composite coronal build-up retained by macro-retentive grooves for restoring mutilated primary maxillary incisors after 36 months.

Design: Forty two primary incisors out of 14 children, aged 2-5years, treated in a private pediatric dental practice under general anesthesia and presented for follow-up after 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months included in the study. The parameters recorded at the baseline and at the follow-up intervals were: retention, colour match, the number and location of the decayed surfaces (recurrent caries), chipping /fracture of the restoration and loss of restoration (failure).

Materials and Methods: A total of (14) pediatric patients aged from 2-5 years presented with mutilated primary anterior teeth due to caries or trauma and treated comprehensively under general anesthesia from June 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled in this study. A total of (42) decayed or traumatized primary anterior teeth were treated with composite coronal build-up based on the micro-mechanical adhesive procedure of composite resin in addition to macro mechanical retentive grooves created on the lateral sides of the cervical one third of the roots of treated teeth. The patients returned at the end of 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months and received clinical examinations. Another dentist (co-author) who did not attend the treatment evaluated the strip crowns clinically by modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical success and/ or failure of resin-bonded composite coronal build-up retained by macro-retentive grooves for restoring mutilated primary maxillary incisors after 36 months.

Design: Forty two primary incisors out of 14 children, aged 2-5years, treated in a private pediatric dental practice under general anesthesia and presented for follow-up after 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months included in the study. The parameters recorded at the baseline and at the follow-up intervals were: retention, colour match, the number and location of the decayed surfaces (recurrent caries), chipping /fracture of the restoration and loss of restoration (failure).

Materials and Methods: A total of (14) pediatric patients aged from 2-5 years presented with mutilated primary anterior teeth due to caries or trauma and treated comprehensively under general anesthesia from June 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled in this study. A total of (42) decayed or traumatized primary anterior teeth were treated with composite coronal build-up based on the micromechanical adhesive procedure of composite resin in addition to macro mechanical retentive grooves created on the lateral sides of the cervical one third of the roots of treated teeth. The patients returned at the end of 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months and received clinical examinations. Another dentist (co-author) who did not attend the treatment evaluated the strip crowns clinically by modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The USPHS system is primarily for posterior teeth, so a new system was developed for anterior teeth. The definitions and criteria for the rating system are detailed in Table (1). Briefly, it was a photographic examination including an evaluation of the color, shape, and integrity of the strip crown.

All patients were recalled, and restorations were evaluated for anatomic form, surface texture, recurrent caries, color match and retention in accordance with Ryge's Direct (US Public Health Service) evaluation criteria at baseline (immediately postoperative), and intervals of 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

The crown was considered to be clinically successful, if the surface appeared smooth, the colour remained good or acceptable, without chipping/ fracture or recurrent caries at tooth/restoration interface and there is no loss of the restoration.

Data are analyzed using percentages, frequencies and cumulative frequencies. The Z-test will be used for comparison between failure rates of the two types of failures (Failure due to trauma & failure of bonding), significance level is set at P< 0·05. The Chi squared test will be used for association between the number of affected surfaces and the total failures. The level of significance (P-value) is set at P< 0·05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 0022

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Only children in the age group of 2-5 years.

    • Teeth affected due to caries or trauma with one or two or three surfaces affected or more.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Any tooth nearing exfoliation or not fit for restoration.

    • Patients with systemic problems which may interfere with general anesthesia.
    • Teeth with excessive pathologic mobility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single arm : Composite coronal build up strip crown
A total of (42) decayed or traumatized primary anterior teeth were treated with composite coronal build-up based on the micromechanical adhesive procedure of composite resin in addition to macro mechanical retentive grooves created on the lateral sides of the cervical one third of the roots of treated teeth.
A total of (42) decayed or traumatized primary anterior teeth were treated with composite coronal build-up based on the micromechanical adhesive procedure of composite resin in addition to macro mechanical retentive grooves created on the lateral sides of the cervical one third of the roots of treated teeth.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the clinical performance of composite strip crowns.
Time Frame: 36 months
Evaluation of the clinical performance of composite strip crowns. By Clinical photographs.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of success and failure of the composite coronal build-up after 3 years follow-up.
Time Frame: 36 months

Assessment of success and failure of the composite coronal build-up after 3 years follow-up in terms of:

  • Retention
  • Color match
  • Recurrent Caries
  • Fracture/Chipping
  • Loss of restoration (Failure)
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rania Nasr, Assoc. Prof., Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No sharing of any private data of participants with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Treatment by composite coronal build-up

3
Subscribe