Understanding Communications Included With COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease of 2019) Home Testing Kits

May 21, 2021 updated by: Barry Dewitt

At Home Self-testing Kits for SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) : A Randomized Trial Assessing How Consumers Interpret and Act on Test Results

To test competing sets of information for consumers on how to interpret hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 home test kit results and whether they report plans to take CDC-recommended actions to protect themselves and others given their test results and two critical aspects of their clinical context: symptoms, recent close exposures. Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized Ellume home test kit (the first kit authorized for over the counter use) for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

To test competing sets of information for consumers on how to interpret hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 home test kit results and whether they report plans to take CDC [Centers for Disease Control]-recommended actions to protect themselves and others given their test results and two critical aspects of their clinical context: symptoms, recent close exposures. Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized Ellume home test kit (the first kit authorized for over the counter use) for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention).

Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized Ellume home test kit for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention). They will be given time to read the documents and the opportunity to download a full "instructions for use" document (the FDA authorized for the ELLUME test kit). They will then be randomized to one of four conditions, asking them to imagine a clinical context: a person with no symptoms and no close COVID-19 contact, no symptoms and close contact,

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

360

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Carnegie Mellon University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must be >18 years old, communicate in English, reside in the United States.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Respondents who complete the survey in under a minute.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard care
information from an FDA authorized home test kit for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test
Experimental: Decision science-based design
Information from a decision science-based design (of similar length to the FDA authorized home test kit information) for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test
decision science-based design explaining actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
choice of action to take with negative test
Time Frame: day 1

choice of actions consistent with CDC-recommendations (eg, isolate or not) for various clinical scenarios (eg, with/without known exposure, with/without symptoms)

Which of the following are safe for Jamie to do over the next week about being around others? [safe, not safe]

  1. Take no additional precautions.
  2. Stay at home except to visit close family or friends. Take no additional precautions at home
  3. Stay at home except when going to the grocery store. Take no additional precautions at home
  4. Stay at home all the time, without exceptions. Take no additional precautions at home.
  5. Stay at home all the time, without exceptions and avoid contact with others, including others in the household
day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Likelihood of COVID-19 infection (qualitative)
Time Frame: day 1

Judgments about the likelihood of COVID-19 infection with a negative or positive test result

How likely is it that Jamie is infected with COVID-19? (choose one)

  1. Definitely yes
  2. Very likely
  3. Likely
  4. Unlikely
  5. Very Unlikely
  6. Definitely not
day 1
Likelihood of COVID-19 infection (quantitative)
Time Frame: day 1

Judgments about the likelihood of COVID-19 infection with a negative ot positive test result

Response using a "slider" to capture numeric estimate

day 1
safe practices
Time Frame: day 1

Change in intent to practice standard public health practices to reduce COVID-19 transmission (hand washing, social distancing, masks) - question asked before and after seeing test result

What else do you think Jamie should do to protect himself and others from COVID-19? [choose: all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, a little of the time, none of the time] In general

  1. Wash hands often
  2. Avoid close contact with people who seem sick (e.g., cough, sneeze, fever)
  3. Stay home

    Outside your home

  4. Try to avoid crowds
  5. Wear a mask when around others
  6. Keep 6 feet from others
  7. Avoid contact with anyone
day 1
ease of use of information rating
Time Frame: day 1

how easy/hard is it to use information about interpreting test results

How easy or difficult was it to read the information about interpreting the test result?" (check one)

  1. Very difficult
  2. Difficult
  3. Neutral
  4. Easy
  5. Very easy
day 1
usefulness of information rating
Time Frame: day 1

how useful is the information about interpreting test results

The information about interpreting the home test kit results was (check one)

  1. Extremely useful
  2. Useful
  3. Neutral
  4. Useless
  5. Completely useless
day 1
helpfulness of information for what to do given positive test result
Time Frame: day 1

How helpful was the information for what to if test was positive

The information helped me know what to do if test result is positive

a. Strongly agree

  1. Agree
  2. Neutral
  3. Disagree
  4. Strongly disagree
day 1
helpfulness of information for what to do given negative test result
Time Frame: day 1

How helpful was the information for what to if test was negative

The information helped me know what to do if test result is negative

a. Strongly agree

  1. Agree
  2. Neutral
  3. Disagree
  4. Strongly disagree
day 1
Assess effect of the FDA authorized description of test accuracy
Time Frame: day 1

According to the test's FDA-authorized label, a clinical study conducted in the USA in 2020 showed that the test "correctly identified 96% of positive samples and 100% of negative samples in patients with symptoms. In people without symptoms the test correctly identified 91% of positive samples and 96% of negative samples."

Based on this information, if Jamie has COVID now, what is the chance that the test will be wrong and say that he does not?

RESPONSE (probability estimate) using slider

day 1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ordering postest probability of infection
Time Frame: day 1
correct ordering of posttest probability of infection risk (derived from qualitative and quantitative ratings)
day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barry Dewitt, Carnegie Mellon University
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Woloshin, MD, Dartmouth College
  • Principal Investigator: Tamar Krishnamurti, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
  • Principal Investigator: Baruch Fischhoff, PhD, Carnegie Mellon University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decision Making

Clinical Trials on decision science-based design

Subscribe