mHealth Physical Activity Intervention for Young Cancer Survivors (AYA-PACT)

January 6, 2026 updated by: AHS Cancer Control Alberta

Adolescents and Young Adults Becoming Physically Active After Cancer Trial

In this randomized controlled trial the investigators will determine whether a mobile health intervention can increase physical activity levels in AYA cancer survivors over a one year period. The investigators will recruit 320 cancer survivors in Alberta who were diagnosed with a first cancer between the ages of 15 to 39 years and are within one year of treatment completion. Participants will be randomized into either the control group (educational information) or the intervention group (educational information; personalized physical activity plan; activity tracker watch; access to a private, online survivor community; motivational text messages and check-in calls/e-mails). All participants will complete fitness testing and questionnaires at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. A final measurement at 24 months will test long-term effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background:

There is a need for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer research because the number of new cancers in young people is increasing and the survivor population is growing. Interventions that try to reduce problems that affect people after cancer are particularly important since its treatments can have negative effects on survivors' physical and mental health even decades after diagnosis.

Aim:

Given the many positive effects of physical activity (e.g. improved fitness and quality of life), the study aims to encourage AYA cancer survivors to be more physically active as they shift from treatment to survivorship care. The main goal of this study is to see if a home-based, mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention can increase physical activity levels by at least 90 minutes/week compared to baseline in AYA cancer survivors.

Methods:

The investigators will conduct a two-center randomized controlled trial of 320 AYA cancer survivors. Participants (N=320) will be Albertan residents, diagnosed with a first cancer between the ages of 15 and 39 years, and within one year of cancer treatment completion. At the start of the study, participants will complete fitness testing and questionnaires. Participants will then be randomly put into either a control or intervention group. The control group will receive educational information only. The intervention group will also receive a personalized physical activity plan, an activity tracker watch, access to a private, online survivor community, motivational text messages and check-in calls/e-mails. Fitness testing and questionnaires will be repeated at 6 and 12 months to see if the intervention increased physical activity levels and improved health outcomes among the participants in the intervention group compared to controls. A final measurement at 24 months will test long-term use.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

287

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N5G2
        • Arthur J.E. Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 39 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lives in Alberta
  • Diagnosed with invasive malignancy in Alberta
  • Completed active cancer directed therapy (cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or definitive surgical intervention) in the last 12 months, except for "maintenance" therapy to prevent recurrences
  • Have the ability to read, write and speak English
  • Have access to the Internet on at least a weekly basis
  • Have a mobile phone with a text messaging plan
  • Willing to be randomized to either arm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Health problems which preclude the ability to walk for physical activity, as measured by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)
  • Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant within the next 6 months
  • Currently taking part in > 300 minutes/week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity on a regular basis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: mHealth Physical Activity Intervention
The intervention arm will receive a 12 month mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention with a goal of increasing their moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity levels by 90 minutes per week above baseline
The intervention includes a physical activity prescription, a Polar activity tracker watch, access to a private AYA cancer survivor community through the Polar Flow community platform, mHealth nudges and surveys via text messaging, and regular phone or email contact from study staff.
No Intervention: Control
Controls will receive general health education materials

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in weekly minutes of moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Measured by Actigraph
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in weekly minutes of sedentary time
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured by Actigraph
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in weekly minutes of sleep
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured by Actigraph
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global Sleep Quality Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Global score range is 0 to 23 where higher scores indicate worse sleep quality
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in weight
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured in kilograms
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in body mass index (BMI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured by combining height (meters) and weight (kilograms) and reported in kg/m2
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in waist and hip circumference
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured in centimeters
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured by peak oxygen consumption in relative (ml/kg/min) values using the incremental Balke and Ware treadmill test with direct measures of gas exchange and ventilation
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured by peak oxygen consumption in absolute (L/min) values using the incremental Balke and Ware treadmill test with direct measures of gas exchange and ventilation
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured in kilograms using a hand dynamometer
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in upper body muscular strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured in kilograms using an 8-10 repetition maximum (RM) chest press test used to predict 1-RM
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in upper body muscular endurance
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured in kilograms using the maximum number of chest press repetitions completed at 50-70% of estimated 1-RM
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in lower body muscular strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured in kilograms using an 8-10 repetition maximum (RM) leg press test used to predict 1-RM
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in lower body muscular endurance
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Measured in kilograms using the maximum number of leg press repetitions completed at 50-70% of estimated 1-RM
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in frailty
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Defined according to the Fried phenotype which takes into account low lean muscle mass, exhaustion, low energy expenditure, walking limitations, and weakness
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Health Component subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better mental health
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Health Component subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better physical health
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Functioning subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate higher functioning
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Role-physical subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate higher functioning
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Bodily Pain subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate less pain
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) General Health subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better health
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Vitality subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate higher vitality
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Social Functioning subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate higher functioning
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Role-emotional subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate higher functioning
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Short Form 36 Mental Health subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better mental health
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Impact of Cancer subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Physical subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Emotional subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Cognitive subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Cancer Worry subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Employment subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Education subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Cancer Distress Scales for AYAs Practical subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Scores range from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate more distress
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Function Perceived Cognitive Impairment subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life.
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) Comments From Others subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 16 where higher scores indicate poorer cognition
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) Perceived Cognitive Abilities subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 36 where higher scores indicate poorer cognition
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) Impact on Quality of Life subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 16 where higher scores indicate poorer cognition
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Fatigue (FACT-F)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 52 where higher scores indicate less fatigue
Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Changes in the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months,12 months
Score range is from 0 to 44 where higher scores indicate better financial wellbeing
Baseline, 6 months,12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Christine Friedenreich, Cancer Care Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Miranda Fidler-Benaoudia, Cancer Care Alberta

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Subscribe