- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04777149
Random Noise Stimulation to Enhance Cortical Drive & Improve Hand Function
October 24, 2022 updated by: Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Random Noise Stimulation to Enhance Corticomotor Drive for Improved Hand Function
Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) results in hand and arm function impairments and decreased independence in performance of daily activities such as bathing, eating, dressing, writing, or typing.
Recent approaches that involve the application of non-invasive brain stimulation have the potential to strengthen the remaining connections between the brain and the spinal cord for improved hand function.
Combining brain stimulation with performing upper limb functional tasks may further increase the ability of individuals with tetraplegia to use their hands.
The purpose of this study is to investigate if "random noise", a special type of brain stimulation that most people cannot feel, can be used to enhance upper limb function in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Specifically, the investigators will examine if a combined treatment protocol of random noise and fine motor training results in greater improvements in motor and sensory hand function compared to fine motor training alone.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Detailed Description
Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) results in upper extremity (UE) functional impairments that can restrict independence, social participation, and overall quality of life.
Evidence shows that short duration of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) can strengthen the transmission of information through the spared corticospinal pathways and improve UE functional recovery in individuals with tetraplegia.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which is a clinically accessible NIBS approach, has been used to modulate cortical plasticity and improve hand function.
However, the high variability in the reported effects of tDCS raises questions about its clinical value and highlights the need to investigate more robust NIBS protocols.
Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) is a novel NIBS approach that produces more consistent facilitatory effects compared to tDCS.
TRNS delivers a low alternating current with a continuously changing intensity over a wide frequency range.
Further, tRNS has excellent tolerability and no risk of skin burns since it is a polarity independent stimulation approach.
When tRNS is applied over the motor cortex, it increases cortical excitability in the hand representation area and enhances motor learning in healthy adults.
Despite the potential promise of tRNS in increasing corticomotor drive for improved motor performance, its application in persons with SCI is novel.
Therefore, in this study, the investigators propose to use tRNS to augment the therapeutic effects of functional task practice (FTP).
Our aim is to compare the efficacy of a 3-day tRNS+FTP protocol on cortical excitability, UE motor, and sensory function to tDCS+FTP and to sham-stimulation+FTP in individuals with tetraplegia.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
19
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
- Shepherd Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spinal Cord Injury level above C8
- ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) classification level: C, D
- Time since injury: ≥ 1 year
- Active intrinsic hand muscles in at least one UE
- Active extrinsic hand muscles in both UE
- Ability to follow multiple step commands
- Ability to communicate pain or discomfort
- Willingness to participate in testing
- Ability to obtain informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Implanted metallic device in the head and/ or pacemaker
- History of seizures
- History of severe headaches
- Severe contractures of UE that would limit participation in FTP
- Prior tendon or nerve transfer surgery
- Received Botulinum toxin injection in the tested UE in the last 3 months
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS)
Participants in this group will receive a combined intervention (3 days of tRNS during functional task practice and 3 days of sham-stimulation during functional task practice).
|
Two electrodes will be placed over the targeted areas on participant's head.
A current of random frequency and intensity will be delivered.
TRNS will be applied during the first 20 min of functional task practice.
Two electrodes will be placed over the targeted areas on participant's head.
A continuous low intensity current will be delivered for 1- 2 min.
|
|
Active Comparator: transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
Participants in this group will receive a combined intervention (3 days of tDCS during functional task practice and 3 days of sham-stimulation during functional task practice).
|
Two electrodes will be placed over the targeted areas on participant's head.
A continuous low intensity current will be delivered for 1- 2 min.
Two electrodes will be placed over the targeted areas on participant's head.
A continuous low intensity current will be delivered.
TDCS will be applied during the first 20 min of functional task practice.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Cortical excitability
Time Frame: Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
The communication between brain and spinal cord will be evaluated.
Sensors that detect muscle activity will be placed over hand muscles.
Pulses of stimulation will be applied to the head using a type of non-invasive brain stimulation called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
The size of the muscle response will be recorded.
|
Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
|
Change in Strength (key pinch and grasp strength)
Time Frame: Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
Key pinch and grasp strength will be assessed using a dynamometer.
|
Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
|
Change in Sensory function (sensation subtest of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension)
Time Frame: Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
Semmes and Weinstein Monofilaments will be applied on 3 dorsal and palmar sensory test locations in each hand.
Each location is scored from 0 to 4.
|
Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Unimanual function (Grasp and Release Test)
Time Frame: Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
Participants will be required to grasp, move, and release six objects of different size and weight.
For each task, the number of successful and unsuccessful attempts is 30s will be recorded.
|
Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
|
Change in Bimanual function (Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory)
Time Frame: Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
This test consists of 9 functional tasks that require bimanual coordination.
Each item is graded on a 7-point activity scale with higher scores suggesting better bimanual function.
|
Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
|
Change in Sensory Function (revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment)
Time Frame: Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
Tactile sensation, proprioception, stereognosis, and two-point discrimination will be tested.
Higher scores indicate better sensory function.
|
Baseline; Post Testing Week 1; Post Testing Week 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anastasia Zarkou, PT,MS,PhD, Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 12, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 10, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
August 10, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 26, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
March 2, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 26, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 24, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 762
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingInjury, Spinal Cord
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Institut GuttmannNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Traumatic Spinal Cord InjuriesSpain
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
Ekso BionicsBurke Medical Research InstituteCompletedInjuries, Spinal CordUnited States
-
ReWalk Robotics, Inc.Unknown
-
Kessler FoundationNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)United States
Clinical Trials on transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS)
-
Midwestern UniversityRecruiting
-
University of RegensburgCompletedChronic TinnitusGermany
-
Spanish Foundation for Neurometrics DevelopmentUniversidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaCompletedBrain Injury | Motor Skills DisordersUnited Kingdom
-
Hôpital le VinatierCompletedImpulsive Behavior | InhibitionFrance
-
University of MinnesotaMinneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical CenterTerminated
-
Georgetown UniversityRecruitingStroke | Brain Tumor | Traumatic Brain Injury | Visual Field Defect, Peripheral | Hemianopia | Quadrantanopia | Cortical Blindness | Visual Field DefectUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalRecruitingCerebrovascular AccidentTaiwan
-
University of ManchesterCompleted
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnMal de Debarquement SyndromeUnited States
-
Burke Medical Research InstituteNot yet recruiting