Individualized Dose Study of ATG in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

April 7, 2023 updated by: Daihong Liu, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Impact of Optimal Doses of Antithymocyte Globulin Conditioning on Graft-versus- Host Disease and Virus Reactivation in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The purpose of this study is to determine the response and toxicity rate of two different dosages (Individualized dosage VS. fixed dosage) of ATG as a prophylaxis for acute GVHD in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is an important complication of haplo-HSCT. The Seattle group initially introduced the use of ATG as a treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) recipients. Presently, in both myeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) haplo-PBSCT, ATG is part of postengraftment immunosuppressive regimens.

The regimens for prophylaxis of GVHD based on 10mg/kg rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobin (ATG, Thymoglobulin®, Genzyme Polyclonals S.A.S) effectively reduced the occurrence of grade II-IV aGvHD. However, the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and EB virus (EBV) reactivation were higher due to a slower immune reconstitution. The 100-day cumulative incidence of CMV and EBV viremia were both over 70% in our unmanipulated haplo-PBSCT program. The optimal dose of ATG balancing the efficacy of GVHD prophylaxis and the risk of virus reactivation in haplo-PBSCT remains unknown.

Reports on the pharmacokinetics of Thymoglobulin in allo-HSCT revealed a high variability. Recent pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the half-life of total ATG after transplant is longer than the active ATG (which is available to bind to human lymphocytes and causes the desired immunological effects). And active ATG appears more associated with pharmacodynamics effects. The investigators found that virus reactivation and acute GVHD were highly affected by ATG exposure (area under the curve, AUC) in previous cohort study. The investigators have found an optimal range of active ATG exposure balancing the efficacy of GVHD prophylaxis and the risk of virus reactivation. The incidence of CMV reactivation and III-IV aGVHD reduced to 60%, 6% respectively.

The results suggested that Individualized dosing of ATG has a potential advantage in balancing the efficacy of GVHD prophylaxis and the risk of virus reactivation in haplo-PBSCT. This may improve the survival and quality of life of patients undergoing haplo-PBSCT. A prospective randomized trial is required to compare the efficacy of Individualized dosage of ATG as a prophylaxis for acute GVHD in haplo-PBSCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

63

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of hematological malignancies refer to the 2016 WHO classification.
  2. Aged 14 to 60 years.
  3. Karnofsky or Lansky performance status [27] ≥ 70%. Please refer to Appendix A.
  4. First transplantation.
  5. Adequate organ function
  6. Patient and/or legal guardian must sign informed consent for HSCT.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ex-vivo T-cell depleted grafts.
  2. Pregnancy or breast-feeding or unwilling to use proper contraception.
  3. Unable to assess whether the malignancy is in complete remission.
  4. History of hypersensitivity to any biological product.
  5. Sensibility to rabbit proteins or previous treatment with Thymoglobuline®.
  6. Subjects with uncontrollable systemic infection (viral, bacterial or fungal).
  7. Participation in other trial in which the dose of Thymoglobuline® is fixed other than individualized dose.
  8. Unable to sign the informed consent form.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Individual dose of Thymoglobulin
Individual dose of Thymoglobulin (r-ATG) : Individual dose of ATG was Intravenous infused every day from day -5 to day -2 (total ATG dose was calculated based on pharmacokinetic index, within a range of 6 mg/kg to 10mg/kg)
Individual dose of ATG was Intravenous infused every day from day -5 to day -2 (total ATG dose was calculated based on pharmacokinetic index, within a range of 6 mg/kg to 10mg/kg). Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) was added to conditioning regimens for 4 days (days -5 and -2). Prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was performed with cyclosporine A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and short-term methotrexate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The cumulative incidences of EBV reactivation
Time Frame: 180 days after transplantation
The cumulative incidences of EBV reactivation in participants after transplantation, tested by realtime PCR
180 days after transplantation
The cumulative incidences of CMV reactivation
Time Frame: 180 days after transplantation
The cumulative incidences of CMV reactivation in participants after transplantation, tested by realtime PCR
180 days after transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 1 year after transplantation
Defined as the time from transplantation to last follow-up or death due to any cause
1 year after transplantation
Nonrelapse mortality (NRM)
Time Frame: 1 years after transplantation
Defined as death due to causes other than malignancy relapse
1 years after transplantation
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 1 years after transplantation
Defined as survival with no evidence of relapse or progression.
1 years after transplantation
Relapse
Time Frame: 1 years after transplantation
Defined as reappearance of leukemic blasts in peripheral blood or ≥5% blasts in BM or reappearance or new appearance of extramedullary leukemia.
1 years after transplantation
Engraftment
Time Frame: 28 days after transplantation
Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first day with a neutrophil count > 0.5 × 10^9/L on three consecutive days postnadir; platelet engraftment was defined as the first day with a platelet count > 20 × 10^9/L without transfusion for five consecutive days postnadir.
28 days after transplantation
The cumulative incidences of aGVHD (refer to MAGIC criteria)
Time Frame: 100 days after transplantation
Defined as the proportion of participants who developed acute GVHD
100 days after transplantation
The cumulative incidences of cGVHD (refer to NIH criteria)
Time Frame: 2 years after transplantation
cGvHD was diagnosed and graded according to the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria: mild, moderate or severe respectively.
2 years after transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Dai-Hong Liu, Dr., Chinese PLA General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 14, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S2020-484-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Antithymocyte Globulin

Subscribe