Impact of Daily, Digital and Behavioral Tele-health Tapering Program for Perioperative Surgical Patients Exposed to Opioids and Benzodiazepines.

February 3, 2022 updated by: Evan Pivalizza, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to examine the safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a controlled taper off of opioids and/or benzodiazepines, with the use of behavioral health tele-health based therapy services, in the perioperative patient.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative benzodiazepines opioid dependence (daily use of opioids or benzodiazepines preoperatively) (Naive: No Meds 30 Days Prior to surgery,Opioid tolerant/dependant: Use of Meds on Most Days For 1 or more months prior to surgery)
  • Subject willing to use Lucid Lane program to provide behavioral health support perioperative period up to 6 months post-op for tolerant opioid/benzo users
  • Subject is willing to discuss Lucid Lane progress with the University of Texas Health Science Center(UTHealth) perioperative team and prescribing clinicians
  • Subject is willing to sign a Lucid Lane Client Agreement
  • Willing to sign an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious mental illnesses including schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, severe bipolar disorder, and severe major depression.
  • Active suicidal ideations
  • Patients on methadone or buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder (i.e. for treatment of addiction, and not for treatment of pain)
  • Patient unwilling to use or not possessing access to a device that allows for video visits (e.g. a smartphone, tablet, or computer)
  • Patients who are on palliative care
  • Insufficient ability to use English to participate in the consent process, the intervention or study assessments.
  • Insufficient ability to provide informed consent to participate
  • If the patient misses more than 2 lucid lane sessions per week, the staff will be immediately notified by Lucid Lane.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Opioid and Benzodiazepine Naive-patients
Opioid and Benzodiazepine Naive-patients, defined as no medications 30 days prior to surgery
Duration of treatment : 1 month Lucid Lane is a service that will be used by patients scheduled for elective orthopedic or neurosurgical spine surgery that will incorporate continuous MEASUREMENT & MONITORING, PERSONALIZED TREATMENT PLANNING and REAL-TIME INTERVENTIONS (MPI) as the patient is tapering off of opioids and/or benzodiazepines. Patients will participate in the Lucid Lane program.Daily support will include 1 or more from the following: Therapist chat, and/or audio psychotherapy sessions, and/or group therapy sessions, Cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT), Mindfulness, and/or peer support. Patients will submit a weekly survey and the therapist will submit weekly reports to the physician.
EXPERIMENTAL: Opioid and Benzodiazepine Tolerant-patients
Opioid and Benzodiazepine Tolerant-patients, defined as use of medications on most days for 1 or more months (>30 days) prior to surgery
Duration of treatment : 6 months Lucid Lane is a service that will be used by patients scheduled for elective orthopedic or neurosurgical spine surgery that will incorporate continuous MEASUREMENT & MONITORING, PERSONALIZED TREATMENT PLANNING and REAL-TIME INTERVENTIONS (MPI) as the patient is tapering off of opioids and/or benzodiazepines. Patients will participate in the Lucid Lane program.Daily support will include 1 or more from the following: Therapist chat, and/or audio psychotherapy sessions, and/or group therapy sessions, CBT, Mindfulness, and/or peer support. Patients will submit a weekly survey and the therapist will submit weekly reports to the physician.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients that engage and participate in the process
Time Frame: 30 days post intervention
Engagement and participation are defined as patient's commitment for 1 hour a week as scheduled.
30 days post intervention
Number of patients that engage and participate in the process
Time Frame: 90 days post intervention
Engagement and participation are defined as patient's commitment for 1 hour a week as scheduled.
90 days post intervention
Number of patients that engage and participate in the process
Time Frame: 180 days post intervention
Engagement and participation are defined as patient's commitment for 1 hour a week as scheduled.
180 days post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients in the naive group that successfully taper off of the benzodiazepine or opioid
Time Frame: 30 days post intervention
30 days post intervention
Percentage of patients in the naive group that successfully taper off of the benzodiazepine or opioid
Time Frame: 90 days post intervention
90 days post intervention
Percentage of patients in the tolerant group that successfully taper off of the benzodiazepine or opioid
Time Frame: 180 days post intervention
180 days post intervention
Emotional well-being as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale
Time Frame: 30 days post intervention
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale has 7 questions each ranging in score from 0-3, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
30 days post intervention
Emotional well-being as measured by the The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 30 days post intervention
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) consists of 10 questions with a total score ranging form 1 to 27, with a higher score indicating greater depression.
30 days post intervention
Symptoms as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
Time Frame: 30 days post intervention
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System consists of 10 questions, each question ranging from 0-10, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. The ESAS rates the intensity of common symptoms, including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath.
30 days post intervention
Emotional well-being as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale
Time Frame: 90 days post intervention
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale has 7 questions each ranging in score from 0-3, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
90 days post intervention
Emotional well-being as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 90 days post intervention
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) consists of 10 questions with a total score ranging form 1 to 27, with a higher score indicating greater depression.
90 days post intervention
Well-Being as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
Time Frame: 90 days post intervention
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System consists of 10 questions, each question ranging from 0-10, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. The ESAS rates the intensity of common symptoms, including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath.
90 days post intervention
Emotional well-being as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale
Time Frame: 180 days post intervention
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale has 7 questions each ranging in score from 0-3, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
180 days post intervention
Emotional well-being as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 180 days post intervention
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) consists of 10 questions with a total score ranging form 1 to 27, with a higher score indicating greater depression.
180 days post intervention
Well-Being as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)
Time Frame: 180 days post intervention
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System consists of 10 questions, each question ranging from 0-10, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome. The ESAS rates the intensity of common symptoms, including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath.
180 days post intervention
Quality of life as measured by the Quality of life Score
Time Frame: 30 days post intervention
The range of scores is between 15 to 105, with a higher score or number being indicative of a higher quality of life.
30 days post intervention
Quality of life as measured by the Quality of life Score
Time Frame: 90 days post intervention
The range of scores is between 15 to 105, with a higher score or number being indicative of a higher quality of life.
90 days post intervention
Quality of life as measured by the Quality of life Score
Time Frame: 180 days post intervention
The range of scores is between 15 to 105, with a higher score or number being indicative of a higher quality of life.
180 days post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evan G Pivalizza, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 7, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid and Benzodiazepine Naive-patients

Subscribe