PERSEUS-PS Randomized Controlled Trial (PERSEUS-PS)

September 28, 2023 updated by: Athanasios Chalkias, MD, PhD, University of Thessaly

Assessment of the Efficacy of Personalized Physiology-guided Resuscitation in Patients With Cardiac Arrest: The PERSEUS Pilot Randomized Trial

The PERSEUS protocol is a new approach to the resuscitation of highly monitored patients with cardiac arrest. It aims at the optimization of all the available physiological parameters and the full exploitation of both the "cardiac pump" and "thoracic pump'. This protocol will help to titrate chest compressions, ventilation, and vasopressor dosing to physiological parameters, increasing survival after cardiac arrest with favorable neurological outcome

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND

Since 2000, resuscitation guidelines remain uniform across all cardiac arrest patients, focusing on the delivery of chest compressions to a standardized rate and depth and algorithmic vasopressor dosing. Although the concept of goal-directed hemodynamic optimization as a treatment strategy to improve clinical outcome in critically ill patients has been tested since the 1980s, no human study has established that prospectively targeting hemodynamics during CPR improves outcomes until now. Nevertheless, individualizing resuscitation to the appropriate hemodynamic and ventilatory goals rather than a standard Bone-size-fits-all treatment seems a promising new therapeutic strategy that can be applied during resuscitation attempts in highly monitored patients.

The PERSEUS protocol is a new approach to the resuscitation of highly monitored patients with cardiac arrest. It has been developed based on our experience and the observation that the most important determinant of survival is the optimization of all the available physiological parameters and the full exploitation of both the "cardiac pump" and "thoracic pump'.

Physiological and pathophysiological aspects of cardiac arrest Cardiac arrest interval Immediately after the abrupt loss of effective blood flow, the hypotension-induced baroreflex withdrawal with the net increase in the vascular resistance maintains an impaired antegrade and pulmonary blood flow. The systemic and pulmonary blood flow continue for at least 30-60 s, until the pressure gradient between the aorta and the right side of the heart, as well as between the pulmonary artery and the left atrium, has been completely dissipated, resulting in a rapid increase in the volume of the right ventricle and the extrapericardial component of the pulmonary veins. When arterial and systemic venous pressures reach equilibrium, the mean systemic filling pressure (Pmsf) is approximately 6-12 mmHg. The coronary blood flow declines to zero, but CPP remains positive because of the retrograde coronary flow. However, this diminishes the removal of norepinephrine from the interstitial spaces, which together with the formation of cardiac edema prolongs vasoconstriction and enhances myocardial hypoperfusion and hypoxia.

At the same time, cerebral perfusion decreases while the damage of fatty acids of the neuronal cell membrane by reactive oxygen species leads to a progressive increase in membrane permeability and severe derangements of intracellular electrolytes, resulting in cell swelling and brain edema formation. This, together with venous congestion, increases intracranial pressure (ICP) and damages the neuropil and synaptic structures and/or contacts.

The PERSEUS personalized physiology-guided resuscitation protocol Recognizing cardiac arrest in highly monitored areas can be more difficult than in other hospital areas, such as the ward. Considering that the vast majority of alarms from sensors are false alarms, cardiac arrest should be recognized and confirmed by the combined assessment of the rhythm, the arterial blood pressure and waveform, the abrupt decrease of ETCO2, and the loss of carotid pulse. Once cardiac arrest is confirmed, CPR should be initiated without delay with high-quality chest compressions according to the recent resuscitation guidelines. However, the effectiveness of chest compressions is depending on the venous return, which is proportional to the pressure gradient between Pmsf and CVP, and particular attention is needed by the rescuers to determine Pmsf within the first 5-7.5 s of cardiac arrest and prior to the onset of chest compressions. The Pmsf is a quantitative measurement of the patient's volume status and represents the tone of venous reservoir, indicating the pre-arrest "vasoreactivity" status of the patients. Therefore, optimizing Pmsf during CPR is paramount for increasing survival rates.

During the first cycle of CPR, the resuscitation efforts must maintain a relaxation DAP of ≥ 40 mmHg (calculated at the time of full chest decompression). In patients with a lower DAP, administration of epinephrine or vasopressin should be based on the pre-arrest value of Pmsf and/or systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and is anticipated to be beneficial in those with Pmsf < 6 mmHg and/or SVR < 800 dynes·sec·cm-5, enhancing volume recruitment from the unstressed compartment and increasing the stressed volume. In all other patients, the vasoreactivity will be maintained for some time provided that intravascular volume and chest compressions are sufficient. Therefore, circulatory volume should be increased in patients with a pre-arrest CVP < 2 mmHg using a fluid bolus and/or the passive leg-raising maneuver. However, it should be noted that rapid and liberal fluid administration during CPR may lead to an excessive increase in RAP, aggravating venous return and CPP, especially when administered via a jugular or subclavian central venous catheter. At the onset of cardiac arrest, ventilatory parameters should be changed to tidal volume 6 ml/kg, respiratory rate 10 min-1, I:E 1:2, PEEP 0 cm H20, and FiO2 100%. During this cycle, all other treatment efforts must follow current recommendations for standard CPR.

After the onset of the second cycle of CPR, the resuscitation efforts should be continued as above while assessing ETCO2. As stated previously, ventilation during CPR by using currently recommended chest compression rates may take place entirely below functional residual capacity and may not provide adequate blood oxygenation due to small airway closure, increasing pulmonary vascular resistance and impairing gas exchange. Therefore, mean airway pressure should be maintained 40-45 cmH2O in patients with DAP ≥ 40 mmHg and ETCO2 < 10 mmHg to facilitate gas exchange. On the contrary, all patients with DAP > 40 mmHg and ETCO2 > 15 mmHg should be assessed for hypercapnia, and if present, they should be treated by increasing the ventilatory rate by up to 50% (or less if necessary to maintain DAP ≥ 40 mmHg). Also, severe acidosis should be treated immediately because it causes vasodilatation which may decrease venous return and CPP.

During the third cycle of CPR, the resuscitation efforts should be continued as above while assessing ScvO2, which should be maintained 65-80%. In patients with ScvO2 < 65%, transfusion of red blood cells should be initiated when Hb is ≤8 g/dl to improve oxygen delivery. In patients with Hb > 8 g/dl, a fluid bolus should be given to improve circulatory flow provided that DAP is maintained ≥ 40 mmHg. In patients with DAP ≥ 40 mmHg and a ScvO2 value of > 80%, hypothermia should be excluded and treated aggressively if present, the FiO2 should be decreased in case of hyperoxemia (PaO2 > 200 mmHg), and a low-dose vasodilator may be considered when microcirculatory shunting and loss of hemodynamic coherence between macro- and microcirculation can be directly assessed or possible (e.g., DAP ≥ 40 mmHg, Hb > 8 g/dl, PaO2 > 200 mmHg, ScvO2 > 80%, and mixed venous oxygen tension ≤ 26 mmHg (if available), with or without hyperlactatemia). In patients with normal ScvO2, trend cerebral oxygenation monitoring (near-infrared spectroscopy - NIRS) should be used because it focuses more on the amount of change from the pre-arrest baseline cerebral oxygenation value. Decreasing FiO2 until PaO2 is 200 mmHg can be considered when NIRS is > 50% of the prearrest value, while HUP-CPR (30°) should be considered in patients with NIRS ≤ 30% of the pre-arrest value and signs or known increased intracranial pressure. The resuscitation efforts may be considered as adequate in patients who have reached the pre-defined targets and have a NIRS of 30-50% of the pre-arrest value, and should be continued by repeating the approach from the beginning.

AIM

The PERSEUS resuscitation protocol is a new approach to the resuscitation of highly monitored patients with cardiac arrest and may help to titrate chest compressions, ventilation, and vasopressor dosing to physiological parameters. The aim of this double-center study is to investigate if resuscitation with the PERSEUS protocol can increase survival after cardiac arrest with favorable neurological outcome.

METHODS

Design This is a prospective observational study designed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The study will be register at Clinical Trials.gov and has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital of Larisa, under the reference number 2670/3-2-2020.

Patient eligibility All intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) with a CPR event requiring chest compressions in a highly monitored area [Operating Room, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or Emergency Department] will be eligible for inclusion. Each patient will be allocated into two groups; patients in group A will be resuscitated with the PERSEUS protocol, while patients in group B will receive standard CPR according to the latest European Resuscitation Council guidelines on resuscitation. Random allocation will be carried out by a researcher who will not be involved in data collection using the sealed envelope technique.

Data Collection and Monitoring Data analysis will be based on predefined data points on a prospective data collection form. The staff will be blinded to measurements until the end of the study and all data are analyzed. Clinical monitoring throughout the study will be performed to maximize protocol adherence, while an independent Data and Safety Monitoring research staff will monitor safety, ethical, and scientific aspects of the study.

We will use the Utstein-style templates for in-hospital cardiac arrest data. Return of spontaneous circulation will be defined for all rhythms as the restoration of a spontaneous perfusing rhythm for more than 20 minutes. Survival with a favorable neurological outcome will be defined as a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1, 2 or no change from baseline. The CPC scoring system assesses functional outcomes among survivors of cardiac arrest and has been extensively validated and shown to reliably predict functional neurological disability.

Data management The goal of the clinical data management plan is to provide high-quality data by adopting standardized procedures to minimize the number of errors and missing data, and consequently, to generate an accurate database for analysis. Remote monitoring is performed to signal early aberrant patterns, issues with consistency, credibility and other anomalies. Any missing and outlier data values will individually revised and completed or corrected whenever possible.

Ethics and dissemination The study will be performed according to national and international guidelines. The present research investigation was reviewed by the IRB at the Larisa University Hospital and determined to be IRB exempt.

Competing interests None declared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Thessaly
      • Larisa, Thessaly, Greece, 41110
        • University Hospital of Larisa, Department of Anesthesiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring prior to and during CPR
  • first compression of CPR captured on transmitted arterial blood pressure waveform data
  • internal jugular or subclavian central venous catheter prior to and during CPR
  • patients with measurement of systemic vascular resistance prior to and during CPR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to determine any of the aforementioned parameters during CPR
  • unable to determine when CPR started and stopped
  • subjects within the exclusion period of another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PERSEUS CPR
Patients will be resuscitated according to the PERSEUS protocol
Resuscitation based on patient physiology
Active Comparator: CONTROL
Patients will be resuscitated according to current Advanced Life Support guidelines
Resuscitation based on current guidelines

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ROSC
Time Frame: From start of CPR until return of spontaneous circulation, assessed up to 60 minutes
Return of spontaneous circulation
From start of CPR until return of spontaneous circulation, assessed up to 60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Days hospitalized in the intensive care unit
Up to 8 weeks
Days on mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
How many days the patient will be mechanically ventilated
Up to 8 weeks
Survival to hospital discharge
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Dead or alive at hospital discharge with favorable neurological outcome (CPC 1 or 2)
Up to 8 weeks
1-month survival
Time Frame: At 1 month after hopsital discharge
Dead or alive at 1 month after hospital discharge with favorable neurological outcome (CPC 1 or 2)
At 1 month after hopsital discharge
3-month survival
Time Frame: At 3 months after hopsital discharge
Dead or alive at 3 months after hospital discharge with favorable neurological outcome (CPC 1 or 2)
At 3 months after hopsital discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Athanasios Chalkias, MD, PhD, University of Thessaly

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

PD may be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Arrest With Successful Resuscitation

Clinical Trials on PERSEUS CPR

3
Subscribe