Effectiveness of the EMPOWER™ Modular Pacing System and EMBLEM™ Subcutaneous ICD to Communicate Antitachycardia Pacing (MODULAR ATP)

May 11, 2026 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation
The MODULAR ATP Clinical Study is designed to demonstrate safety, performance, and effectiveness of the Modular Cardiac Rhythm Management (mCRM) Therapy System.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The MODULAR ATP Clinical Study will enroll subjects with a standard Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) indication applying international practice guidelines, as well as those who already have an implanted S-ICD System and satisfy the inclusion criteria for this study, while not meeting any exclusion criteria. Subjects will be followed for at least 6 months following mCRM Therapy System implantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

297

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Linz, Austria
        • Kepler Universitaetsklinikum
      • Québec, Canada
        • Institut Universitaire de Cardilogie et Pnuemologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
        • Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Montreal Heart)
      • Prague, Czechia
        • Na Homolce Hospital
      • Grenoble, France
        • CHU Grenoble - Hospital Michallon
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • CHRU de Lille
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes-Hopital Laennec
      • Paris, France
        • Hospital European Georges-Pompidou
      • Brescia, Italy
        • Spedali Civil di Brescia
      • Cotignola, Italy
        • Maria Cecilia Hospital SPA
      • Naples, Italy, 80131
        • AZ Osp Monaldi
      • Pisa, Italy, 56126
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Amsterdam University Medical Center
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands
        • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CE
        • Erasmus MC University Medical Center
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
      • Leeds, United Kingdom, LS1 EX
        • The General Infirmary
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L14 3PE
        • Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Manchester Heart Center
      • Southampton, United Kingdom
        • Southampton University Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Banner University Medical Center Phoenix
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 84258
        • Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea
    • Arkansas
      • Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States, 72401
        • Arrhythmia Research Group
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
        • AdventHealth Orlando
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory University Hospital
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40503
        • Baptist Health Lexington
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper Hospital - University Medical Center
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • Northwell University Hospital
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Medical Center
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
        • Ohio Health Research Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37403
        • Erlanger Medical Center
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Sentara Norfolk General
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who meets Class I, IIa, or IIb guideline ICD indications[i],[ii], or who has an existing TV-ICD[iii] or S-ICD[iv]
  • Patient who is deemed to be at risk for MVT based on at least ONE of the following:

    • History of Non-Sustained MVT with LVEF ≤ 50%
    • History of sustained VT/VF (secondary prevention) with LVEF ≤ 50% or significant cardiac scar*
    • History of syncope deemed to be arrhythmic in origin
    • History of ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35%
    • History of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35% and significant scar*
  • Patient who is willing and capable of providing informed consent (which is not to include the use of a legally authorized representative (LAR) for documentation of informed consent) and participating in all testing associated with this investigation at an approved study site and at the intervals defined by this protocol
  • Patient who is age 18 years or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with an ongoing complication due to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) infection or CIED explant
  • Transvenous lead remnants within the heart from a previously implanted CIED (Note: transvenous lead remnants outside the heart (e.g., in the SVC) are allowed)
  • Patient with a known LA thrombus
  • Patient with a ventricular arrhythmia due to a reversible cause
  • Patient indicated for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
  • Patient with another implanted medical device that could interfere with implant of the leadless pacemaker, such as an implanted inferior vena cava filter or mechanical tricuspid heart valve
  • Patient requires rate-responsive pacing therapy
  • Patient is entirely pacemaker-dependent (defined as escape rhythm ≤ 30 bpm)
  • Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome (i.e. Acute Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina) within 40 days
  • Inability to access femoral vein with a 21-French or larger inner diameter introducer sheath due to known anatomy condition, recent surgery, and/ or other relevant condition
  • Patient who has an active implanted electronic medical device intended for chronic use concomitantly with the study system, such as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Note that a temporary pacing wire is allowed.
  • Patient with known or suspected sensitivity to Dexamethasone Acetate (DXA)
  • Patient with a known cardiovascular anatomy that precludes implant in the right ventricle
  • Patient with a known allergy to any system components
  • Patient with a known or suspected intolerance to S-ICD conversion testing, based on physician discretion
  • Patient is not likely to have meaningful survival** for at least 12 months (documented or per investigator's discretion)
  • Patient is enrolled in any other concurrent study. Co-enrollment into other studies such as observational studies/ registries needs prior written approval by BSC. Local mandatory governmental registries are accepted for co-enrollment without approval by BSC.
  • Patient who is a woman of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant at the time of study enrollment (method of assessment upon investigator's discretion)

    [i]Al-Khatib, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. (2018); 138:e272-e391.

[ii] 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal (2015) 36, 2793-2867.

[iii] TV-ICD system is expected to be fully explanted during or prior to full Coordinated System implant

[iv] Potential subjects with a Model 1010 S-ICD Pulse Generator are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting upgraded to Model A209, A219 or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator; Patients with an existing S-ICD PG subject to the electrical overstress field action are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting a new BSC Model A209 or A219, or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator

*Significant cardiac scar is defined as a scar involving at least one ventricular myocardial segment (i.e., basal infero-septum) as identified in the official findings of a cMRI, or nuclear viability study, or echo report by the interpreting radiologist/ cardiologist who is not affiliated with the study

**meaningful survival means that a patient has a reasonable quality of life and functional status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MODULAR ATP Study Participants

All subjects that signed the informed consent were included.

Patients consented to receive the mCRM Therapy System which consists of the EMPOWER Leadless Pacemaker and an EMBLEM S-ICD upgraded with investigational firmware.

Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing.
Other Names:
  • Communication of S-ICD to Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker (LCP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Endpoint 1: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 6 Months
Time Frame: Implant through 6 Months Post-Implant
Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-Free Rate Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 6 months post implant
Implant through 6 Months Post-Implant
Safety Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 12 Months
Time Frame: Implant through 12 Months Post-Implant

Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-free Rate

Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 12 months post implant

Implant through 12 Months Post-Implant
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 1: Percentage of Body Postures With Communication Success Between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG
Time Frame: At the 6 Month Follow-up

Communication Success between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG

Data from subjects will be assessed for effectiveness of communication between S-ICD and the EMPOWER PG by evaluating if a paced beat is present during communication testing in four postures: upright, supine, and right and left side.

At the 6 Month Follow-up
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Classified as a Pacing Capture Threshold (PCT) Responder
Time Frame: At the 6 Month Follow-up

Proportion of Subjects with Adequate Pacing Capture Threshold

Effectiveness will be confirmed by evaluating the percentage of subjects considered to be a PCT Responder, defined as a subject with a PCT measurement of ≤ 2.0 V @ 0.4 ms pulse width

At the 6 Month Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint: Subject-specific Slope of EMPOWER PG Sensor-Indicated Rate to the Subject's Workload on Treadmill Test
Time Frame: At the 3 Month Visit

Metabolic-Chronotropic Relation Slope (MCR Slope) from the Kay-Wilkoff Model

Using the Kay-Wilkoff model, data will be assessed to evaluate the proportionality of the EMPOWER PG's sensor-indicated rate to the subject's workload during the treadmill test

At the 3 Month Visit
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: Implant through 2 years post-implant
All-Cause Survival; data not reported as it is still being collected
Implant through 2 years post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD, Amsterdam University Medical Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Lluis Mont, MD, PhD, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona
  • Principal Investigator: Vivek Reddy, MD, The Mount Sinai Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Lloyd, MD, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers in this study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tachycardia, Ventricular

Clinical Trials on mCRM Therapy System

Subscribe