Pivotal Aspiration Therapy With Adjusted Lifestyle Therapy Study (PATHWAY)

January 23, 2020 updated by: Aspire Bariatrics, Inc.
This research study is being performed to find out if a new device, AspireAssist Aspiration Therapy System, can help people with obesity to lose weight without causing too many side effects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Aspiration process works by "correcting" meal portions after eating by removing some of the food left in your stomach 20 minutes after your meal, which reduces the number of calories absorbed by your body. This is done through a tube placed through the abdomen into the stomach with a small valve attached at the surface of your skin. An aspiration system will attach to that valve after each major meal of the day and allow you to remove a portion of that meal.

During this study you will also be provided with Lifestyle therapy which includes behavioral therapy, diet and physical activity education. This Lifestyle therapy will also be provided to the participants who do not receive the AspireAssist so that the two groups can be compared and the benefit of aspiration for weight loss can be determined.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92161
        • Dept VA San Diego Health Care System
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20060
        • Howard University Center for Wellness and Weight Loss Surgery
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Boston Medical Center
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
    • Pennsylvania
      • Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States, 19047
        • St. Mary Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19146
        • University of Pennsylvania Center for Weight and Eating Disorders

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Measured BMI of 35.0-55.0 kg/m2 at time of screening.
  2. 21- 65 years of age (inclusive) at time of screening.
  3. Failed attempt for a duration equal to 3-months at weight loss by alternative approaches (e.g. supervised or unsupervised diets, exercise, behavioral modification programs).
  4. Stable weight (<3% change in self-reported weight) over the previous 3 months at time of screening).
  5. Women of childbearing potential must agree to use at least one form of birth control (prescription hormonal contraceptives, diaphragm, IUD, condoms with or without spermicide, or voluntary abstinence) from time of study enrollment through study exit.
  6. Willing and able to provide informed consent in English and comply with the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous abdominal surgery that significantly increases the medical risks of gastrostomy tube placement
  2. Esophageal stricture, pseudo-obstruction, severe gastroparesis or gastric outlet obstruction, inflammatory bowel disease
  3. History of refractory gastric ulcers
  4. Ulcers, bleeding lesions, or tumors discovered during endoscopic examination.
  5. History of radiation therapy to the chest or abdomen
  6. Uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure >160/100).
  7. Diabetes treated with insulin or sulfonylurea medications
  8. Any change in diabetes medication in previous 3 months
  9. Hemoglobin A1C >9.5%
  10. History or evidence of serious pulmonary or cardiovascular disease, including acute coronary syndrome, heart failure requiring medications, or NYHA (New York Heart Association) class III or IV heart failure (defined below):

    Class III: patients with marked limitation of activity and who are comfortable only at rest Class IV: patients who should be at complete rest, confined to bed or chair and who have discomfort with any physical activity

  11. Coagulation disorders (platelets < 100,000, PT > 2 seconds above control or INR > 1.5)
  12. Anemia (Hemoglobin <11.0 g/dL in women and <12.5 g/dL in men)
  13. Liver enzymes (ALT and AST) ≥3.0 times the upper limit of normal
  14. Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) >1.5 x upper limit of normal at screening.
  15. Osteoporosis (DEXA T-Score ≤ -2.5 standard deviations below normal peak values).
  16. History of fragility fractures (fractures resulting from a fall from a standing height or less, or presenting in the absence of obvious trauma)
  17. Pregnant or lactating
  18. Diagnosed Bulimia or diagnosed Binge Eating Disorder (using DSM IV criteria)
  19. Night Eating Syndrome (diagnosed by EDE)
  20. Serum potassium < 3.8 mEq/L
  21. Chronic abdominal pain that would potentially complicate the management of the device
  22. Taking a GLP-1 agonist < 6 months.
  23. Taking prescription or over-the-counter medications for weight loss in the last 3 months before screening, or planning to participate in a commercial weight loss program in the next 24 months.
  24. Taking medication once or more per week that causes weight gain (e.g. atypical antipsychotics, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, lithium, selected anticonvulsants, tamoxifen, glucocorticoids)
  25. Self- reported history of substance abuse in last 3 years.
  26. Malignancy in the last 5 years (except for non-melanoma skin cancer).
  27. Physical or mental disability, or psychological illness that could interfere with compliance with the therapy.
  28. At high risk of having a medical complication from the endoscopic procedure or Aspiration Therapy weight loss program for any reason, including poor general health or severe organ dysfunction, such as cirrhosis or renal dysfunction (GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening, calculated by using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Aspiration Therapy
Aspiration Therapy and Lifestyle Therapy
Use of the AspireAssist device in aspiration therapy
Other Names:
  • AspireAssist Aspiration Therapy System
Lifestyle therapy is a behavioral, diet and physical activity education program
Other Names:
  • Lifestyle Behavioral Therapy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Lifestyle Therapy
Lifestyle Therapy only
Lifestyle therapy is a behavioral, diet and physical activity education program
Other Names:
  • Lifestyle Behavioral Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The first effectiveness co-primary endpoint is the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks. The hypothesis for the first primary effectiveness endpoint is that the difference in the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks for the Aspiration Therapy (AT) group and Control group is at least 10%. Percent EWL is defined as absolute weight loss divided by baseline excess weight and multiplied by 100. Excess weight is determined from ideal body weights based on a BMI=25 kg/m2.
52 weeks
% of Subjects Who Achieve >25% EWL
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The second co-primary effectiveness endpoint is that at least 50% of the AT group at 52-weeks achieve > 25% EWL.
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Percent Total Body Weight Loss
Time Frame: 52 weeks
i) Mean percent absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group
52 weeks
Percent of Subjects With ≥10% Total Body Weight Loss
Time Frame: 52 weeks
ii) proportion of subjects who achieve ≥10% absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group
52 weeks
Mean Percent Change in Serum Lipids
Time Frame: 52 weeks
iii) mean percent change serum lipids (triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentration) in the AT group compared to the control group
52 weeks
Mean Percent Change in Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 52 weeks
iv) mean percent change in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the AT group compared to the control group
52 weeks
Mean Change in Score for IWQOL Questionnaire
Time Frame: 52 weeks

v) "Impact of Weight on Quality of Life" (IWQOL) questionnaire total score

Total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. Based on the algorithm developed by Crosby, et.al., patients' IWQOLLite total scores are considered to have shown meaningful improvement from baseline to one year if they increased between 7 and 12 points, depending upon baseline severity in comparison to the normative mean. Normative means for the IWQOL-Lite have been derived from a sample of 534 non-obese individuals who were not enrolled in any weight loss treatment program [238 women and 296 men with BMI's between 18.5 and 29.9]. The data presented is the mean change in total score. The AT group demonstrated a mean improvement (increase) in score of 16.3 points, the Control group a mean improvement (increase) of 11.7 points.

52 weeks
Mean Change in Hemoglobin A1C
Time Frame: 52 weeks
vi) change in mean hemoglobin A1C (only subjects with T2 diabetes at baseline). Hemoglobin A1C is measured as DCCT%. The change in mean DCCT% from Baseline to Week 52 is reported for this secondary endpoint.
52 weeks
Procedural Success
Time Frame: 52 weeks
vii) percent procedural success (defined as successful endoscopic placement of the A-Tube) in all subjects undergoing endoscopy
52 weeks
Change in Medication for Hypertension
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for hypertension
52 weeks
Change in Medications for Dyslipidemia
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for dyslipidemia
52 weeks
Change in Medications for Type 2 Diabetes
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for Type 2 Diabetes
52 weeks
Change in Number of Subjects on Hypertension Medication
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of subjects on Hypertension medication
52 weeks
Change in Number of Subjects on Dyslipidemia Medications
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of subjects on Dyslipidemia medications
52 weeks
Change in Number of Subjects on Diabetes Medication
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of subjects on Diabetes medication
52 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Outcomes
Time Frame: 52 weeks
The incidence of procedure-related, device-related, and therapy-related serious adverse events. Also, the development of adverse eating behaviors will be assessed.
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 13, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 24, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P12-001V

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No individual participant data will be shared.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Aspiration Therapy (AspireAssist)

3
Subscribe