Lung Cancer Patients' Attitudes to a Second Course of Radiotherapy

May 27, 2021 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

A Qualitative Study of Patients' Attitudes to the Risks and Potential Benefits of Potential Toxicities of Radical Re-irradiation for Lung Cancer

Patients with lung cancer are often treated with high dose x-ray treatment (radical radiotherapy) to control the disease. After one course of radiotherapy, after a period of time, there is a risk that the cancer can come back in either the same place or nearby in the lungs. This happens to about 700 patients in the UK every year. There is no strong evidence to suggest what the best treatment is in this situation.

One possible treatment is a second course of radiotherapy (re-irradiation). Early studies show that a re-irradiation may cause significant side effects like breathlessness or problems swallowing, but may control the cancer for a long period of time. We want to do a clinical trial to investigate if re-irradiation improves cancer control compared to other treatments to help guide treatment for patients with recurrent disease.

Before we can go ahead with the trial, we would like to talk to patients who are have completed radiotherapy to find out what are their feelings about having a second course of radiotherapy if needed, and how the side effects from the initial course of radiotherapy or the projected side-effects from the second course would affect that decision.

This information is vitally important to help develop a trial about re-irradiation in lung cancer as it will demonstrate if patients would accept a second course of radiotherapy, and, by accounting for patient concerns in the trial design, will make it more likely to recruit well.

This study will perform telephone interviews with patients five weeks after completing a course of radical radiotherapy for lung cancer at the Beatson Cancer Centre. We expect to interview 16-30 patients. This study will run over the course of 1 year. This research is funded by the Beatson Cancer Charity and The University of Glasgow.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients who are having radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer in the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, who are consent to a semi-structured interview about their experience of radiotherapy and their feelings on re-treatment if necessary

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years old or above
  • Pathological or radiological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
  • Undergoing radical radiotherapy to the thorax using the following fractionations (55 Gray in 20 fractions, 54 Gray in 36 fractions or any Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) fractionation that delivers a biological effective dose of greater than 100Gy10) as part of their primary lung cancer treatment at time of study enrolment
  • Patients receiving concurrent and/or adjuvant systemic therapies are permitted
  • Radiotherapy is delivered in the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
  • Signed, written informed consent
  • Willing and able to complete study processes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fluent in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Interview arm
Group of patients who have agreed to have a qualitative interview on the topic of recurrence of lung cancer
Semi-structured interview to identify attitudes to re-irradiation in lung cancer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feelings and concerns re: second radiotherapy course
Time Frame: Dec 2021
Explore patients' feelings and concerns about having a second course of radiotherapy for recurrent lung cancer. This will be assessed using thematic analysis of the transcripts of semi-structured interviews, and the outcome will be the identification of themes that participants have expressed with regard to a second course of radiotherapy e.g. "side-effects of radiotherapy", or "cost of another treatment".
Dec 2021

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Choice of treatment in recurrent setting
Time Frame: Dec 2021
Identify factors that patients consider when deciding on potential treatments in the setting of locally recurrent lung cancer (including effect of COVID-19 on treatment choice). This will be assessed using thematic analysis of the transcripts of semi-structured interviews, and the outcome will be the identification of themes that participants have expressed with regard to a choosing a treatment in the event of relapse e.g. "worry about chemotherapy side-effects", or "risk of infection".
Dec 2021
Attitude to side effects in context of possible outcomes
Time Frame: Dec 2021
Investigate how patients' acceptance of side effects changes with the different projected outcomes of re-irradiation. This will be assessed using thematic analysis of the transcripts of semi-structured interviews, and the outcome will be the identification of any hierarchy of side-effects that patients would rather not experience e.g. "I can cope with fatigue but I don't want to be breathless".
Dec 2021
Toxicity from previous radiotherapy
Time Frame: Dec 2021
Explore the relationship between the toxicities patients experienced during radiotherapy and their attitudes to a second course of radiotherapy. As part of the semi-structured interview, participants will be asked to grade the severity of symptoms on a three point scale (mild/moderate/severe) and then state if they would consider a second course of radiotherapy if needed (yes/no). There will be scope in the semi-structured interview to expand on any topic, and this will undergo thematic analysis.
Dec 2021
Attitude to surveillance scans
Time Frame: Dec 2021
Investigate patients' awareness of surveillance imaging after radical treatment and willingness for scans. This will be assessed using thematic analysis of the transcripts of semi-structured interviews, and the outcome will be the identification of themes that participants have expressed with regard to a surveillance e.g. "I'd prefer to have frequent scans to see if there is any change in the tumour", or "frequent scans make me anxious".
Dec 2021

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Harrow, PhD, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 16, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Transcribed and anonymised interviews will be available on the University of Glasgow research repository after the trial has completed

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrence

Clinical Trials on Semi-structured interview

Subscribe