- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04814979
Effects of Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolysis
Effects of Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Pain and Functional Disability in Patients With Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab
-
Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 74000
- Institutional Review Board of Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Lahore
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Both gender
- Diagnosed subjects of lumbar spondylolysis with symptomatic low back pain since four months
- Age: 20-40 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with the history of neurological or autonomic deficits,
- Other fracture or bony abnormalities
- Rheumatic disease
- Other spinal problems
- Post-menopausal female
- Osteoporosis
- Osteopenia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental Group
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound along with routine physical therapy
|
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) consists of frequencies usually ranging from 0.75- 1.5 MHz at intensities <100mW/cm² (usually about 30mW/cm²) and usually pulsed at 1:4.
The transducer head is strapped or otherwise held in place and remains stationary for treatment periods in the region of 20 minutes.
Again, US medium is used for efficient sound transfer to deeper tissues.
This modality was approved by the FDA in the United States in 1994 for the accelerated healing of fresh fractures and then approved by the same body in 2000 for the treatment of established non-union fractures.
The studies presented to the FDA demonstrated that LIPUS had a positive effect during all three main stages of fracture healing, i.e. inflammatory, reparative and remodelling by enhancing angiogenesis, chondrogenesis and osteogenesis.
Gentle hamstrings stretching for 15 seconds 3 times a day.
Flexibility of these muscle reduces stress to the lumbar region thus enhances the spino-pelvic rhythm (lumbar motion/pelvic motion).
Strengthening of abdominal muscles (transversus abdominis and internal oblique).
Training of these "stability" muscles in the lumbar spine provides a solid foundation for the individuals to integrate them into their functional movement patterns.
Exercises focusing on these muscles have been shown to significantly decrease pain and disability in people with spondylolysis.
Each exercise will be performed as 3 sets of 10 repetitions on alternate days.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
Routine physical therapy alone
|
Gentle hamstrings stretching for 15 seconds 3 times a day.
Flexibility of these muscle reduces stress to the lumbar region thus enhances the spino-pelvic rhythm (lumbar motion/pelvic motion).
Strengthening of abdominal muscles (transversus abdominis and internal oblique).
Training of these "stability" muscles in the lumbar spine provides a solid foundation for the individuals to integrate them into their functional movement patterns.
Exercises focusing on these muscles have been shown to significantly decrease pain and disability in people with spondylolysis.
Each exercise will be performed as 3 sets of 10 repetitions on alternate days.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Pain on Numeric Pain Rating Scale at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
|
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain with a reliability of 0.96 and validity 0.86. It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale. The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain. Change = (Week 12 Score - Baseline Score) |
Baseline and Week 12
|
|
Change from Baseline in the Functional Disability on Oswestry Disability Index at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
|
The Oswestry Disability Index is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools with a reliability of 0.90 and validity 0.96. Scoring Instructions: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: Example: 16 (total scored) 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed or not applicable the score is calculated: 16 (total scored) 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5% Minimum detectable change (90% confidence): 10% points (change of less than this may be attributable to error in the measurement) Change = (Week 12 Score - Baseline Score) |
Baseline and Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Pain on Numeric Pain Rating Scale at week 20
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 20
|
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain with a reliability of 0.96 and validity 0.86. It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale. The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain. Change = (Week 20 Score - Baseline Score) |
Baseline and Week 20
|
|
Change from Baseline in the Functional Disability on Oswestry Disability Index at and week 20
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 20
|
The Oswestry Disability Index is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools with a reliability of 0.90 and validity 0.96. Scoring Instructions: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: Example: 16 (total scored) 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed or not applicable the score is calculated: 16 (total scored) 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5% Minimum detectable change (90% confidence): 10% points (change of less than this may be attributable to error in the measurement) Change = (Week 20 Score - Baseline Score) |
Baseline and Week 20
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fahad Tanveer, PhD, University of Lahore
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-UOL-FAHS-UIPT/690/2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spondylolysis
-
Western Norway University of Applied SciencesHaukeland University Hospital; Federation Internationale de Football Association and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRecruitingAthletes | Spondylolysis | Symptomatic SpondylolysisUnited States
-
Medacta International SARecruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Osteochondrosis | Spondylolysis LumbarSwitzerland
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedSpondylolysisKorea, Republic of
-
Sarah Network of Rehabilitation HospitalsUniversity of BrasiliaUnknownSpondylolisthesis | Spondylolysis | Spine; Arthrosis | Spondylolysis, Multiple Sites in SpineBrazil
-
Megan Donaldson PT, PhD, FAAOMPTAkron Children's HospitalCompletedChildren | Spondylolisthesis | SpondylolysisUnited States
-
Novadip BiosciencesCompletedSpondylolisthesisCzechia, Poland, Belgium
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterCompletedSpondylolisthesisUnited States
Clinical Trials on Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS)
-
Tao LiuXuanwu Hospital, Beijing; Tianjin Medical University General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Orthofix Inc.Active, not recruitingMetatarsal FractureUnited States
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class IISyrian Arab Republic
-
Suzhou Municipal HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University; The First Affiliated... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
McMaster UniversityCompletedKnee OsteoarthritisCanada
-
Ammar Kasem AlzoubiRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance ComplicationEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Sadam ElayahSichuan UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Bioventus LLCCompletedMitigation of Fracture Non-union in Patients at RiskUnited States