Direct Repair Surgery for Spondylolysis of Lumbar in Young Population

May 2, 2014 updated by: Jin S. Yeom, Seoul National University Hospital

Lumbar spondylolysis is a relatively common condition that causes severe and perennial back pain in young populations. Conservative treatment of this condition may be futile, and may eventually require surgical treatment such as direct repair of pars defect and a segmental lumbar fusion with an anterior or posterior approach. Recently, of surgical treatment methods for spondylolysis, direct repair surgery of pars defect has been focused due to its inherited strengths. Most importantly, fusion surgery caused the affected segment to lose the nature range of motion and furthermore adjacent segment to be adversely affecting such as adjacent disc disease or degeneration, while direct repair theoretically could preserve the motion of the affected segment, which do not cause the adjacent segment problems as being the fusion surgery, as well as could produce better surgical outcomes with relatively less invasive technique as compared to fusion surgery. Moreover, previous articles have demonstrated that the direct repair surgery for spondylolysis of lumbar spine could achieve great functional and radiological outcomes. However, most of the previous studies was conducted using lower level designed study such as retrospective and small sample size, thereby prior literature does not provide clear information on the therapeutic outcome of direct repair for lumbar spondylolysis, especially for managing spondylolysis of young population.

Therefore, The investigators aimed to evaluate and determine the outcomes of direct repair surgery for lumbar spondylolysis in young population. To our knowledge, this is the first report that describes the functional and radiological outcomes of direct repair for spondylolysis in young populations with prospective cohort study design and relatively large sample size.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyounggido
      • Yangju, Gyounggido, Korea, Republic of
        • Armed Forces Yangju Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 30 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients for whom conservative treatment for six months and three-times injection treatments had failed
  • a follow-up period of one year or more after surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with abnormal muscle activity or ambulation such as parkinsonism and neuromuscular disease.
  • patient inability to accurately record results of preoperative and postoperative questionnaires due to problems such as a history of stroke, dementia, or major medical illness that required intensive treatment
  • patient follow-up was limited to one year or less

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Direct repair of pars defect
The pars defect was repaired with 4.5mm cortical screw.
Direct repair at pars defect was performed with 4.5mm cortical screw in young spondylolytic patients.
Other Names:
  • 4.5mm cortical screw
NO_INTERVENTION: Conservative treatment
The pars defect of spondylolysis was not repaired with cortical screw.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Union rate using dynamic radiographs and CT scans
Time Frame: Postoperative 1 year
union rate at postoperative 1 year was evaluated using dynamic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans.
Postoperative 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity on VAS
Time Frame: postoperative 3 months
Pain intensity on lower back was evaluated with 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at the postoperative 6 months.
postoperative 3 months
Pain intensity on VAS
Time Frame: postoperative 6 months
Pain intensity on lower back was evaluated with 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at the postoperative 6 months.
postoperative 6 months
Pain intensity on VAS
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
Pain intensity on lower back was evaluated with 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) at the postoperative 6 months.
postoperative 12 months
Functional outcome on ODI and SF-12
Time Frame: Postoperative 3 months
Functional outcome using oswestry disability index (ODI) and 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) was evaluated separately at the postoperative 3 months.
Postoperative 3 months
Functional outcome on ODI and SF-12
Time Frame: Postoperative 6 months
Functional outcome using oswestry disability index (ODI) and 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) was evaluated separately at the postoperative 3 months.
Postoperative 6 months
Functional outcome on ODI and SF-12
Time Frame: Postoperative 12 months
Functional outcome using oswestry disability index (ODI) and 12-item short form health survey (SF-12) was evaluated separately at the postoperative 3 months.
Postoperative 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 6, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylolysis

Clinical Trials on Direct repair of pars defect

3
Subscribe