Efficacy of START (Startle Rehabilitation Therapy) in the Treatment Stroke-induced Aphasia/Apraxia (START)

February 19, 2022 updated by: Claire Honeycutt, Arizona State University
A stratified, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of remotely delivered START treatment to individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke (with recruitment focused on individuals with low SES) will be conducted. Subjects and assessors will be blinded to the condition making the experiment double blind. Specifically, subjects will be told that we are exploring a new therapy that using different sounds to improve therapy. Parallel group design will ensure that subjects in the Control group are unaware that their "sounds" are softer than the START group. Trainers may become aware that a loud sound is present thus a unique Assessor will evaluate clinical performance before and after training making the study double-blind. Fifty-four subjects will undergo baseline testing in the laboratory to establish their capacity for functional and expressive speech as well as their self-reported health-related quality of life (power analysis below). Next, subjects will participate in a high-frequency, word-picture verification/ auditory-repetition treatment, 2 hr/day for 5 consecutive days focusing on expression of words of functional significance (e.g., water, fall). Subjects will either receive training with START or without (Control). Subjects will be re-tested immediately following training as well as one-month post to assess retention. Aim 1 will evaluate capacity of START to enhance SLT outcomes by assessing the % change in clinical assessment of functional and expressive speech. Our preliminary data points to a robust response [details]. Aim 2 will focus on the capacity of these changes to 1) be retained and 2) impact subject's reported quality of life. NOTE: While we are planning in-person baseline, end, and retention testing, in response to COVID, we have established remote clinical screening using peer-reviewed validated techniques for WAB and ABA-2 (see Alternative Solutions). All preliminary data collected for this proposal were collected remotely via no-contact protocols.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

54

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tempe, Arizona, United States, 85287
        • Recruiting
        • Arizona State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old
  • Native English Speakers
  • Capacity to provide informed consent
  • Right-handed
  • Corrected to normal vision
  • Left hemisphere cerebral stroke at least 6 months prior to testing
  • Presence of severe-to-moderate, non-fluent aphasia, i.e. Aphasia Quotients of 0-50 on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PsychCorp, 2007)
  • Corrected pure tone threshold (octave frequencies 250- 4000 Hz) norms for their age and gender41,42 NOTE: Audiometry data will be collected for all participants by lab personnel trained by an audiologist in a sound-attenuated booth. Based on our ongoing aphasia studies, we expect that ~30% of participants will use hearing aids; we will not exclude these individuals but rather include hearing aid use as a covariate in analyses.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe concurrent uncontrolled medical problems (e.g. cardiorespiratory impairment).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: START
START (startle adjuvant rehabilitation therapy) will be applied.
Exposure to loud acoustic stimulus during training of motor task (in this case speech).
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Subjects will train but without START

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Aphasia Battery
Time Frame: end of training
(WAB) will be administered to determine aphasia severity via its aphasia quotient, as well as aphasia type. Severe non-fluent aphasia will be defined as an aphasia quotient < 50 and a classification of Broca's, global, or transcortical motor aphasia.
end of training
Western Aphasia Battery Retention
Time Frame: one month post
(WAB) will be administered to determine aphasia severity via its aphasia quotient, as well as aphasia type. Severe non-fluent aphasia will be defined as an aphasia quotient < 50 and a classification of Broca's, global, or transcortical motor aphasia.
one month post
Apraxia Battery for adults
Time Frame: end of training
(ABA-2) will be collected to identify presence and severity of apraxia of speech (AOS) via its six subtests: diadochokinetic rate, increasing word length, limb and oral apraxia, and latency and utterance for polysyllabic words, repeated trials, and inventory of articulation characteristics.
end of training
Apraxia Battery for adults Retention
Time Frame: one-month post
(ABA-2) will be collected to identify presence and severity of apraxia of speech (AOS) via its six subtests: diadochokinetic rate, increasing word length, limb and oral apraxia, and latency and utterance for polysyllabic words, repeated trials, and inventory of articulation characteristics.
one-month post
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, end of training, one-month post
(SIS) is a self-report scale of disability and health-related quality of life. We will use the subdomains of Communication, ADL/LDL, Life participation, Quality of life, Social Relationships, Depression.
Baseline, end of training, one-month post
Stroke Impact Scale Retention
Time Frame: one-month post
(SIS) is a self-report scale of disability and health-related quality of life. We will use the subdomains of Communication, ADL/LDL, Life participation, Quality of life, Social Relationships, Depression.
one-month post

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 22, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START)

3
Subscribe