- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04822870
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block and Iliohypogastric/Ilioinguinal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
April 2, 2021 updated by: Yi Feng, MD, Peking University People's Hospital
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block and Iliohypogastric/Ilioinguinal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section: a Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial Study
The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block and iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section.
Study Overview
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
87
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100044
- Peking University People's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- singleton pregnancy
- gestation of at least 37 weeks
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
- finish Pfannenstiel section under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- pruritus existed before the surgery
- allergic to lidocaine, ropivacaine or dexamethasone
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: quadratus lumborum block
Parturients receive ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block as post-operative analgesia.
|
Quadratus lumborum block is an effective nerve block method in post-cesarean section analgesia.
It is a relatively new technique that may provide analgesic effect in somatic pain and visceral pain, but has not been verified yet.
|
|
Experimental: iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block
Parturients receive ultrasound-guided iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block as post-operative analgesia.
|
Iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block is a widely used nerve block technique.
It can provide somatic analgesia effect in post-cesarean section.
|
|
Active Comparator: epidural analgesia
Parturients receive epidural morphine via epidural catheter placed during anesthesia as post-operative analgesia.
|
Epidural analgesia is a traditional analgesia method.
Epidural morphine can provide effective analgesia but may cause plenty adverse effect.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Every parturient use a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump as supplement for the interventions.
The analgesia pump contains morphine and can record morphine consumption.
Postoperative use of morphine can reflect analgesic effect.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
morphine consumption
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperatively
|
Every parturient use a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump as supplement for the interventions.
The analgesia pump contains morphine and can record morphine consumption.
Postoperative use of morphine can reflect analgesic effect.
|
6 hours postoperatively
|
|
morphine consumption
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
|
Every parturient use a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump as supplement for the interventions.
The analgesia pump contains morphine and can record morphine consumption.
Postoperative use of morphine can reflect analgesic effect.
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
|
morphine consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Every parturient use a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump as supplement for the interventions.
The analgesia pump contains morphine and can record morphine consumption.
Postoperative use of morphine can reflect analgesic effect.
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
pain score
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperatively
|
Use visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 to evaluate pain intensity and reflect analgesic effect.
0 refers to completely no pain, 10 refers to the most severe pain she has experienced.
|
6 hours postoperatively
|
|
pain score
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
|
Use visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 to evaluate pain intensity and reflect analgesic effect.
0 refers to completely no pain, 10 refers to the most severe pain she has experienced.
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
|
pain score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Use visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 to evaluate pain intensity and reflect analgesic effect.
0 refers to completely no pain, 10 refers to the most severe pain she has experienced.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
pain score
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Use visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 to evaluate pain intensity and reflect analgesic effect.
0 refers to completely no pain, 10 refers to the most severe pain she has experienced.
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
effective analgesia time
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Time period between finish the intervention and the first time parturient use the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia pump for analgesia supplement.
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
adverse effect
Time Frame: 6 hours postoperatively
|
Nausea and vomiting, pruritus, oversedation, respiratory depression and urinary retention are considered adverse effects.
The incidence and severity are recorded, 1 score refers to mild, 2 scores refers to moderate, 3 scores refers to severe and treatment needed.
|
6 hours postoperatively
|
|
adverse effect
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
|
Nausea and vomiting, pruritus, oversedation, respiratory depression and urinary retention are considered adverse effects.
The incidence and severity are recorded, 1 score refers to mild, 2 scores refers to moderate, 3 scores refers to severe and treatment needed.
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
|
adverse effect
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Nausea and vomiting, pruritus, oversedation, respiratory depression and urinary retention are considered adverse effects.
The incidence and severity are recorded, 1 score refers to mild, 2 scores refers to moderate, 3 scores refers to severe and treatment needed.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
adverse effect
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Nausea and vomiting, pruritus, oversedation, respiratory depression and urinary retention are considered adverse effects.
The incidence and severity are recorded, 1 score refers to mild, 2 scores refers to moderate, 3 scores refers to severe and treatment needed.
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
satisfaction score
Time Frame: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Ask the patient to evaluate satisfaction score using 0-10.
0 refers totally dissatisfied, 10 refers to the most satisfied
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
hospital stay
Time Frame: at discharge assessed up to 10 days
|
The hospitalize length
|
at discharge assessed up to 10 days
|
|
hospitalize cost
Time Frame: at discharge assessed up to 10 days
|
Total cost in this hospitalization
|
at discharge assessed up to 10 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 31, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
May 1, 2021
Study Completion (Anticipated)
May 1, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 29, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
March 30, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 6, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2021
Last Verified
April 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-Z-01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedPregnancy | Cesarean Section | Elective Cesarean SectionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Ataturk UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial ThicknessTurkey
-
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical UniversityCenter for Perinatology and Pediatric Surgery, Almaty, Kazakhstan; Zhalyn Scientific...RecruitingSkin Wound Healing After Cesarean Section | Cesarean Section Scar HealingKazakhstan
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Chiayi Christian HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, BordeauxMinistry of Health, FranceRecruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedCesarean SectionUnited States
Clinical Trials on quadratus lumborum block
-
The General Authority for Teaching Hospitals and...CompletedCesarean Section | Quadratus Lumborum Block | Transversus Abdominis Plane BlockEgypt
-
Kocaeli UniversityActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Lumbar Disc HerniationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
CHU de ReimsCompletedTotal Hip Replacement SurgeryFrance
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedTransmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Hip SurgeryEgypt
-
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain | Cesarean Section Complications | Patient Satisfaction | BlockTurkey
-
Kocaeli UniversityNot yet recruitingBlood Bupivacaine ConcentrationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military...Not yet recruitingPost Operative AnalgesiaPakistan
-
Ain Shams UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruitingPost Operative Pain, AcuteEgypt
-
Zeycan KahyaCompletedComparison of ESP and QL Blocks for Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Appendectomy (ESP-QLB) (ESP-QLB)Erector Spinae Block | Quadratus Lumborum Nerve BlockTurkey (Türkiye)