Evaluating for a Correlation Between Osteopathic Examination and Ultrasonography on Thoracic Spine Asymmetry (USOMM)

March 28, 2021 updated by: Randall Nydam, Midwestern University

Context: Thoracic spine is a common area of focus in osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) for a variety of conditions. Thoracic spine somatic dysfunction diagnosis is achieved by palpating for asymmetry at the tips of the transverse processes. Previous studies reveal that, instead of following the rule of threes, the transverse processes of a given thoracic vertebra generally align with the spinous process of the vertebra above. Ultrasonography has been widely used as a diagnostic tool to monitor musculoskeletal conditions. Ultrasound has the advantage of absence of radiation, and has shown comparable results to gold standard modalities like MRI in some areas of the spine. In the case of thoracic somatic dysfunction, ultrasound can be used to determine the location of each vertebral transverse process and its relationship with the spinous process. Previous studies have investigated the correlation between osteopathic manipulative medicine and ultrasonography of the cervical, lumbar, and sacral regions. However, no study has yet compared osteopathic structural examination with ultrasonographic examination of the thoracic vertebral region.

Objective: To determine whether there is a dependable correlation of osteopathic palpatory findings of the thoracic transverse processes with the measurements of ultrasonography.

Methods: Subjects were student volunteers recruited from the Midwestern University - Glendale campus. A non-toxic, non-permanent marker was used to mark bony landmarks on the skin to be used by the osteopathic examiners. Two osteopathic physicians (OMM1, OMM2) separately performed structural exams by palpating T2-T5 transverse processes to determine vertebral rotation. Two trained sonographers (US1, US2) separately scanned and measured the distance from the tip of the spinous process to the adjacent transverse processes of the vertebral segment below. Demographic variables were summarized with mean and standard deviation. Interexaminer reliability was assessed with percent agreement, Cohen's Kappa, and Fleiss' Kappa. Recruitment and protocols were approved by the MWU Institutional Review Board.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85308
        • Midwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects are Midwestern University students who were recruited via email announcements, with responses recorded via secure Google Form that was accessible only to the Midwestern University network.

The overall demographics of participants showed 31 (47.0%) males and 35 (53.0%) females. Race and ethnicity were not collected for the purpose of this study as it was not a variable being evaluated or investigated. The subjects' age range is 22-35 years of age, with the mean age as 26.61 (SD = 3.1) for males and 25.71 (SD = 2.7) for females. The BMI range is 15.9 - 36.9kg/m2, with the mean BMI as 24.13 (SD = 4.2) overall, 25.46 (SD = 3.5) for males and 22.95 (SD = 4.5) for females.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First- and Second-year osteopathic medical students who received an email notification
  • Masters program students who received an email notification

Exclusion Criteria:

- A history of or currently diagnosed with scoliosis, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, herniated disc, spinal fracture, or surgery to the spine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interexaminer reliability
Time Frame: Through study completion, which was an average of about 1 year
We looked at the interexaminer reliability between ultrasound and osteopathic structural exam of the thoracic spine.
Through study completion, which was an average of about 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Randall Nydam, PhD, Midwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AZ 1232

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonography

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonography vs Osteopathic manipulative medicine structural exam

Subscribe