Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer

March 27, 2021 updated by: Hani Alhadad

Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer With Hyperbilirubinemia and Impact on Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study

Patients with potentially resectable pancreatic head cancer and high bilirubin level, were stratified into two equal groups according to the method of biliary drainage: endoscopic stenting or percutaneous drainage.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Along with history taking and complete clinical examination, the results of complete blood count, international normalized ratio , renal and liver function tests were obtained. Patients with coagulopathy were corrected by fresh frozen plasma and repeated vitamin K injections to reach an INR of at least 1.4 before the intervention, otherwise, they were excluded. Besides, ultrasound and computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis (pancreatic protocol) were routinely undertaken. Tumors were staged for resectability according to TNM staging system.

Patients were randomly divided by closed envelope method into two groups; patients were allocated to the first group (ERCP) who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography coupled with placement of a 10-French plastic stent; and to the second group (PTD) who underwent Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage.

Preoperative biliary drainage Parenteral broad spectrum antibiotics were administered prior and after each intervention. ERCP was performed under general anesthesia in the operation room and a 10-french (3.2 mm) covered polyethylene stent with side flaps to prevent migration was placed below the level of biliary bifurcation. Stents were inserted over a guidewire via an Olympus 4.2 mm channel endoscope, by standard techniques.

PTD was placed in the interventional radiology department under local anesthesia via the left duct sub-xiphoid approach, only via the external approach. A 6 french gauge catheter was positioned with its tip above the biliary obstruction. After PTD, patients were instructed to drink a lot of fluids to replace fluid loss or they were given temporary intravenous fluid supplementation.

After either procedure, patients were either discharged home or kept in hospital. Those who were discharged were readmitted for preoperative preparation. Patients were followed up clinically as well as by laboratory results. The total and direct bilirubin level and other liver function tests were repeated after ten days from the procedure to estimate the decline in their levels. Post-intervention complications either PTD-related such as bleeding, cholangitis, bile leak and catheter occlusion/displacement; or ERCP-related such as pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding and stent displacement; were recorded.

Surgery After improvement of liver functions, patients were scheduled for PD. All operations were performed through a hockey-stick incision by consultant surgeons experienced in pancreatic surgery. The standard surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation. The effects of pre-operative drainage were evaluated during the operation in terms of operative resection time, blood loss, difficulties of dissection and intra-operative bleeding. While the endoscopic stent is removed intra-operatively after transection of the common hepatic duct, the catheter of PTD is left and inserted in the hepaticojejunostomy (stented anastomosis) to be removed two weeks later. Perioperative complications (< 30 days) were stratified for each group according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with malignant obstruction of the distal common bile duct e.g. adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head or periampullary tumor
  • Hyperbilirubinemia, total bilirubin level more than 10 mg/dL
  • Cholangitis, pruritis, coagulopathy, nausea and anorexia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with advanced disease
  • metastatic disease
  • Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ERCP group
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with plastic stent insertion
resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis
Other Names:
  • whipple operation
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: PTD group
ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic catheter insertion
resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis
Other Names:
  • whipple operation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of participants with operative difficulties as assessed by the operating surgeon
Time Frame: up to 6 hours at the time of surgery
measuring the difficulty of dissection, number of operative complications encountered
up to 6 hours at the time of surgery
number of participants with post operative complications
Time Frame: up to one month
detection of postoperative complications in the early postoperative period
up to one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of participants with postprocedural complications
Time Frame: up to one month after each procedure
detection of postprocedure complications
up to one month after each procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

to keep the confidentiality of each patient

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Jaundice

Clinical Trials on pancreaticoduodenectomy

3
Subscribe