Breast Elasticity Imaging During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

May 28, 2025 updated by: Elisa Konofagou, Columbia University

Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Harmonic Motion Imaging in Women With Breast Cancer

For this study, the investigators propose investigation of a new imaging technique, Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI), and the evaluation of its potential role in prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The investigators hypothesize that changes in HMI parameters will predict response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in early-stage breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the standard of care for treatment of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and inflammatory breast cancer, and is recently being used in earlier stage breast cancer. The ideal outcome of NACT is pathological complete response (pCR), which itself has shown to be associated with improved disease-free survival. However, pCR is currently determined at the time of the surgery when the patient has received the whole cycle of the treatment. Early detection of non-responders to NACT could be used to halt ineffective treatment and start a new chemotherapeutic regimen in order to achieve better tumor response and overall survival. Current techniques to monitor response to NACT based on tumor size changes include mammography, physical examination, ultrasonography and MRI. Clinically assessing tumor size has been shown to be only moderately useful for chemotherapy response prediction in these patients because tumor shrinkage is a late marker of effective treatment. Metabolic activities and microstructure changes induced by NACT can be determined using functional imaging methods such as PET-CT, contrast enhanced MRI and diffuse optical spectroscopy. However, the application of these methods is limited due to high cost and intravenous injection of exogenous contrast agents. Limited studies have shown the potential of ultrasound elastography to be useful in predicting and monitoring response to NACT in breast cancer tumors based on tumor stiffness. Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI) is a novel ultrasound elastography technique that applies an oscillatory force locally and at different depths in the tissue, in order to determine the characteristics of the resulting localized harmonic motion using high precision tracking methods. Highly localized harmonic motion can be noninvasively generated by ultrasonic beams deep inside the tissue and estimated at high precision, by using RF signals and cross-correlation methods. In addition to not being burdened by the drawbacks encountered by existing techniques, due to the highly localized and harmonic nature of the response, the motion characteristics can be directly linked to the local tissue stiffness. In this study, the investigators propose to compare the changes in the measurements provided by HMI and pathological response rate, between baseline, during treatment and end of the treatment to assess whether HMI can early predict the tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NYP
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elisa Konofagou, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women age ≥18
  • Deemed eligible to receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy as per the treating physician, with the dose and schedule deemed appropriate by the treating physician.
  • Any stage invasive breast cancer provided the primary breast tumor size is ≥ 4 mm

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patient is pregnant or lactating
  • Presence of breast implants
  • History of laser or radiation therapy to the affected breast

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HMI Group
Women undergoing standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
Harmonic motion imaging (HMI) is a non-invasive ultrasound elasticity imaging technique that yields a quantitative relative measurement of tissue stiffness suitable for comparisons between individuals and over time. This technique induces dynamic tissue vibrations internally for tissue elasticity characterization. Participants will be asked to lie down on their back, hold still with shallow breathing while pictures/images are taken of the breast where the tumor is located using an ultrasound without any invasive procedures.
Other Names:
  • HMI technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the correlation between change in HMI measurements and pathologic response at completion of neoadjuvant therapy
Time Frame: Baseline and through neoadjuvant therapy completion (an average of 28 weeks)
  • Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be performed to investigate the overall differences in HMI measurements within the tumor and surrounding tissue between responders (pCR and RCB1) and non-responders (RCB2). This relative percent change in tumor stiffness is directly related to HMI measurements.
  • Pathologic response will be assessed by the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score, a continuous and categorical measure of pathologic response and an independent predictor of disease free survival. Pathologic response will be dichotomized, with response defined as a score of 0-1 (RCB<2), and no response defined as a score of 2-3 (RCB2).
Baseline and through neoadjuvant therapy completion (an average of 28 weeks)
Assessment of the correlation between change in HMI measurements and pathologic response during neoadjuvant systemic therapy
Time Frame: Baseline and during short-interval on treatment (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation)
  • Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be performed to investigate the overall differences in HMI measurements within the tumor and surrounding tissue between responders (pCR and RCB1) and non-responders (RCB2). This relative percent change in tumor stiffness is directly related to HMI measurements.
  • Pathologic response will be assessed by the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) score, a continuous and categorical measure of pathologic response and an independent predictor of disease free survival. Pathologic response will be dichotomized, with response defined as a score of 0-1 (RCB<2), and no response defined as a score of 2-3 (RCB2).
Baseline and during short-interval on treatment (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of correlation between percent change of tumor size on breast ultrasound and pathologic response at treatment completion
Time Frame: Baseline and through neoadjuvant therapy completion (an average of 28 weeks)
The investigator will use the statistic Z=(f1-f2)/se where fi= .5ln[(1+ri)/(1-ri)](Fisher transformation of ri), ri is the sample correlation coefficient of Ri and se is the standard error of f1-f2. The investigator will compare Z with standard normal distribution.
Baseline and through neoadjuvant therapy completion (an average of 28 weeks)
Assessment of correlation between percent change of tumor size on breast ultrasound during treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and during short-interval on treatment (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation)
The investigator will use the statistic Z=(f1-f2)/se where fi= .5ln[(1+ri)/(1-ri)](Fisher transformation of ri), ri is the sample correlation coefficient of Ri and se is the standard error of f1-f2. The investigator will compare Z with standard normal distribution.
Baseline and during short-interval on treatment (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of correlation between change in Ki-67 and change in HMI
Time Frame: Baseline and through neoadjuvant therapy completion (an average of 28 weeks)
This will be analyzed using Fisher transformation.
Baseline and through neoadjuvant therapy completion (an average of 28 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elisa Konofagou, PhD, Columbia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAT4412
  • R01CA228275 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No individual participant data (IPD) will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Harmonic motion imaging

Subscribe