Factors Associated With Adenomyosis and a Clinical Scoring System for the Diagnosis

April 1, 2021 updated by: Hakan Aytan, Mersin University
Adenomyosis is a relatively common benign disorder in which endometrial gland and stroma are located within the myometrium resulting angiogenesis of the spiral vessel, hypertrophy of the surrounding smooth muscles and enlargement of the uterus. So far the definitive diagnosis still requires histologic analysis of the hysterectomy specimens or hysteroscopic or laparoscopic biopsy. There is no specific laboratory tests and reliable clinical standards for the diagnosis. The preoperative diagnosis of adenomyosis, would prevent unnecessary therapies, loss of time and use of resources in vain. Therefore precise prediction of this disease without surgery gains importance. Developing a scoring system with clinical evaluation for this purpose will be very helpful in solving this problem. From this point, the investigators aimed to develop a scoring system that will predict presence of adenomyosis wİth high sensitivity using clinical evaluation methods such as history, physical examination, ultrasonography and laboratory tests. A prospective cohort study was conducted with 221 patients. In the study, the investigators have created a clinical scoring system for this purpose for the first time in the literature. In this scoring system, there are simple parameters that can be easily used by the clinician, have a low cost and are repeatable. The effect of each parameter on predicting adenomyosis is different, and the total effect can be calculated according to the answer to be given to all questions. In this simple scoring system, parity, menarche, VAS scores of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia, myometrial heterogeneity in ultrasonography and presence of tenderness during pelvic examination were found to be useful parameters in predicting the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A prospective cohort study was conducted in Mersin University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between 10.02.2017 and 10.08.2017 with 221 patients who had undergone hysterectomy for benign disorders. The patients who were admitted to the hospital with the hysterectomy indications for benign pathologies were visited before the operation and a detailed anamnesis was obtained. Physical and pelvic examinations with transvaginal ultrasound examinations were performed by the same investigator. Demographic characteristics, obstetric and gynecologic histories were noted. The amount of percieved pain was measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Observing myometrial cysts, enlarged uterus, heterogeneous myometrium and or focal nodular areas during transvaginal sonography was considered to suggest adenomyosis. The hysterectomy specimes were evaluated by department of pathology. The diagnosis of adenomyosis was based on the presence of glandular extension ≥2.5 mm below the endometrial myometrial interface.

In order to develop a scoring system a regression analysis was carried out to find the parameters that were associated with the presence of adenomyosis. Number of parities, dyspareunia and dysmenorrhea VAS scores, age of menarche, presence of uterine tenderness and detection of heterogenous myometrium and myometrial cysts during ultrasonography were found to be the significant parameters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

221

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mersin, Turkey
        • Mersin University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patients who were admitted to the hospital with the hysterectomy indications for benign pathologies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with postoperative diagnosis of gynecologic malignancies and who were pregnants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with adenomyosis
Hysterectomy (abdominal or vaginal or laparoscopic) Histopathological assessment Adenomyosis was diagnosed with histopathological assessment.
Hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic)
Other Names:
  • Histopathological evaluation
Active Comparator: Patients without adenomyosis
Hysterectomy (abdominal or vaginal or laparoscopic) Histopathological assessment Adenomyosis was excluded with histopathological assessment.
Hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic)
Other Names:
  • Histopathological evaluation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Severity of dysmenorrhea measured with Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Severity of dyspareunia measured with Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Detection of myometrial heterogeneity during transvaginal ultrasonographic examination
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Detection of myometrial cysts during transvaginal ultrasonographic examination
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Presence of uterine tenderness during pelvic examination
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: HAKAN AYTAN, Prof. MD, Mersin University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenomyosis

Clinical Trials on Hysterectomy

Subscribe