Ultra-Low Tidal Volume Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS Through ECMO (ULTIMATE)

April 1, 2021 updated by: Eddy Fan, University of Toronto

Ultra-Low Tidal Volume Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS Through ECMO (ULTIMATE) Pilot Randomized Trial

Primary Research Question for the Full ULTIMATE Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT): What is the effect of ultra-protective ventilation facilitated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) versus best current conventional ventilation (CV) on all-cause hospital mortality among patients with early moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)?

Secondary Research Questions: Among patients with early moderate-severe ARDS, what is the effect of ultra-protective ventilation versus CV on: (1) duration of mechanical ventilation; (2) duration of ICU and hospital stay; (3) organ dysfunction; (4) barotrauma; and (5) mortality at other time-points (ICU discharge, 28-day, 60-day)?

The ULTIMATE Pilot Study: Before embarking on a definitive multinational trial to address the questions listed above, the ULTIMATE Pilot Study has these 3 specific feasibility objectives:

  1. To assess adherence to our explicit mechanical ventilation protocols, with particular focus on delivered tidal volumes in both groups;
  2. To estimate the rate of patient recruitment and understand barriers to recruitment; and
  3. To measure and understand the reasons for crossovers or rescue by ECMO in the control group.

In addition, we will monitor safety issues, recording serious adverse events in both groups.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
        • University of Alberta Hospital
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sean Bagshaw, MD, MSc
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • London Health Sciences Centre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dave Nagpal, MD
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Karen Bosma, MD
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • University of Ottawa
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrew Seely, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bernard McDonald, MD
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laveena Munshi, MD, MSc
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Neill Adhikari, MD, MSc
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2N2
        • University Health Network - Toronto General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Shaf Keshavjee, MD, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marcelo Cypel, MD, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ewan Goligher, MD, PhD
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elizabeth Wilcox, MD, PhD
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Unity Health
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Laurent Brochard, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jan Friedrich, MD, PhD
    • Quebec
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Francois Lamotagne, MD, MSc
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • New York Presbyterian Hospital
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Brodie, MD
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • OHSU Hospital
        • Contact:
          • TBA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Terri Hough, MD, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Endotracheal mechanical ventilation for ≤ 5 days
  3. Early moderate-severe ARDS (Berlin Definition) - all of the following conditions for ≤ 48 hours i. PaO2/FiO2 ≤200 with PEEP > 5 cmH2O ii. bilateral opacities not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules iii. respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload iv. within one week of a known insult of new or worsening respiratory symptoms
  4. ARDS severity criterion - either 1 of:

    1. PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 150 mm Hg, on PEEP ≥ 10 cm H2O and FiO2 ≥ 0.5

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently receiving any form of ECMO (e.g., venovenous, venoarterial, or hybrid configuration)
  2. Chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure defined as PaCO2 > 60 mmHg in the outpatient setting
  3. Home mechanical ventilation (non-invasive ventilation or via tracheotomy), not CPAP
  4. Actual body weight exceeding 1 kg per centimeter of height
  5. Severe hypoxemia with PaO2/FiO2 < 80 mmHg
  6. Expected mechanical ventilation duration < 48 hours
  7. Treating team is in the process of moving to a palliative mode of care
  8. Moribund patient not expected to survive 24 hours despite ongoing life-sustaining therapies
  9. Confirmed diffuse alveolar hemorrhage from vasculitis
  10. Contraindications to limited anticoagulation (e.g., active GI bleeding, bleeding diathesis)
  11. Pregnancy - due to unknown effects of PaCO2 changes on placental blood flow

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Best conventional ventilation
Experimental: Ultra-protective ventilation with ECMO
Venovenous ECMO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients adhering to the study protocol
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Adherence to our explicit ventilation protocols will be adequate if more than 80% of patients have fewer than 10% of monitored values as major protocol violations
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Proportion of patients crossing over to VV ECMO
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
The number of protocol withdrawals or off-protocol treatment with VV ECMO will be acceptable if fewer than 10% of patients crossover or receive VV ECMO, when not allowed by the protocol
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Number of patients recruited for the study
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Patient accrual will be adequate if we recruit 72 patients from 12 sites over 1 year of enrolment
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilator-free days
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Duration of alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation
Up to 30 days
Length of stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
ICU and hospital length of stay in survivors and non-survivors
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Number of patients with non-pulmonary organ dysfunction
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Using standard definitions
Up to 30 days
Number of patients with barotrauma
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
New barotrauma
Up to 30 days
Mortality
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
At ICU discharge and 30-days
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: At 6 months post-randomization
Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) via telephone
At 6 months post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eddy Fan, MD, PhD, University Health Network, Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Niall Ferguson, MD, MSc, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ULTIMATE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ARDS

Clinical Trials on Venovenous ECMO

3
Subscribe